SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                            Filed by a party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

OPKO HEALTH, INC.

4400 Biscayne Blvd.

Miami, FL 33137

NOTICE OF 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD JUNE 15, 2017

Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of OPKO Health, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), will be held at the Company’s headquarters at 4400 Biscayne Blvd., Miami, Florida, 33137, on Thursday, June 15, 2017 beginning at 10:00 a.m., local time, for the following purposes:

1. To elect as directors the eight nominees named in the attached proxy statement for a term of office expiring at the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified;

2. To take a non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers (“Say on Pay”);

3. To take a non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory vote on Say on Pay in future years (“Say on Frequency”); and

4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.

Holders of record of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, at the close of business on April 20, 2017, will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.

Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, it is important that you vote your shares. Regardless of the number of shares you own, please promptly vote your shares by telephone or internet or, if you have received printed copies of the proxy materials, by marking, signing and dating the proxy card and returning it to the Company in the postage paid envelope provided. Should you attend, you may, if you wish, withdraw your proxy and vote your shares in person.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Kate Inman

Secretary

Miami, Florida

April 28, 2017

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to Be Held on June 15, 2017

The Proxy Statement and 2016 Annual Report are available at www.opko.com.

OPKO HEALTH, INC.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD

THURSDAY, JUNE 15, 2017

This proxy statement is being made available to you by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of OPKO Health, Inc. (the “Company” or “we,” “us” or “our”) in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company that will be held at the Company’s headquarters at 4400 Biscayne Blvd., Miami, Florida 33137, on Thursday, June 15, 2017, beginning at 10:00 a.m., local time, and all adjournments thereof (the “Annual Meeting”), for the following purposes:

Our Board has fixed the close of business on April 20, 2017, as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof. As of that date, there were issued and outstanding 559,338,690 shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share. The holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each outstanding share on all matters submitted to our stockholders.

A nominee for director will be elected to the Board if the votes cast in favor of a nominee by the holders of shares of our common stock present or represented and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present exceed the votes cast against a nominee. In addition, the advisory vote on each of the Say on Pay proposal and the Say on Frequency proposal will be approved if the votes cast in favor of the proposal by the holders of shares of our common stock present or represented and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present exceed the votes cast against the proposal. Because your vote on the Say on Pay proposal is advisory, it will not be binding on the Board or the Company. However, the Compensation Committee of the Board will take into account the outcome of the Say on Pay vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements. Additionally, the Say on Frequency advisory vote is not binding on the Board or the Compensation Committee, and the Company may determine to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than may be indicated by this advisory vote of our stockholders. Any other matter that may be submitted to a vote of our stockholders at the Annual Meeting will be approved if the number of shares of common stock voted for the proposal exceed the votes cast against the proposal, unless such matter is one for which a greater vote is required by law or our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation or our Amended and Restated Bylaws.

The presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of a majority of our outstanding common stock constitutes a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Shares of our stock represented by proxies that reflect abstentions will be counted for the purpose of determining the existence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting, but will have no effect on the election of directors, the Say on Pay proposal, or the Say on Frequency proposal. Shares of stock represented by proxies that reflect “broker non-votes” (i.e., stock represented at the Annual Meeting by proxies held by brokers or nominees as to which (i) the brokers or nominees have not received instructions from the beneficial owners or persons entitled to vote and (ii) the brokers, or nominees, do not have the discretionary voting power on a particular matter) will not be counted for the purpose of determining the existence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting and will have no effect on matters for which brokers or banks do not have discretionary authority. A broker does not have the discretion to vote on the election of directors, the non-binding advisory vote on the Say on Pay proposal, or the non-binding advisory vote on the Say on Frequency proposal. Thus, a broker non-vote will have no effect on the election of directors, the non-binding advisory vote on the Say on Pay proposal, and the non-binding advisory vote on the Say on Frequency proposal.

2

Any stockholder giving a proxy will have the right to revoke it at any time prior to the time it is voted. A proxy may be revoked by: (i) written notice to us at or prior to the Annual Meeting at our offices, attention: Secretary; (ii) execution of a subsequent proxy; (iii) attendance and voting in person at the Annual Meeting; or (iv) re-voting by telephone or internet (only your latest telephone or internet vote will be counted). Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy. If your shares are held in the name of a broker or nominee, you must follow the instructions of your broker or nominee to revoke a previously given proxy. All shares of our stock represented by effective proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting or at any adjournment thereof. Unless otherwise specified in the proxy, shares of our stock represented by proxies will be voted: (i) FOR the election of the Board’s nominees for directors; (ii) FOR the approval of the Say on Pay proposal, (iii) for the selection of “one year” as the frequency with which stockholders are provided an advisory vote on Say on Pay, and (iv) in the discretion of the proxy holders with respect to such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

The Company has mailed this proxy statement and our Annual Report to Stockholders for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (“fiscal 2016”) to our record holders. If you hold shares of the Company by brokers or nominees, the Company has made these materials available to you on the internet or, upon your request, by delivery of printed versions of these materials. These materials were first sent or made available to stockholders on or around April 28, 2017.

Our executive offices are located at 4400 Biscayne Blvd., Miami, Florida 33137.

3

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table contains information regarding the beneficial ownership of our voting stock as of April 14, 2017, held by (i) each stockholder known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of any class of voting stock; (ii) our directors and nominees; (iii) our Named Executive Officers as defined in the paragraph preceding the Summary Compensation Table and our current executive officers; and (iv) all current directors and executive officers as a group. Except where noted, all holders listed below have sole voting power and investment power over the shares beneficially owned by them. Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed below is c/o OPKO Health, Inc., 4400 Biscayne Blvd., Miami, FL 33137.

4

5

PROPOSAL ONE:

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Pursuant to the authority granted to our Board under Article III of our Amended and Restated Bylaws, the Board has fixed the number of directors constituting the entire Board at eight. All eight directors are to be elected at the Annual Meeting, each to hold office until the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders or until his successor is duly elected and qualified. Each stockholder of record on April 20, 2017 is entitled to cast one vote for each share of our common stock either in favor of or against the election of each nominee, or to abstain from voting on any or all nominees. Although management does not anticipate that any nominee will be unable or unwilling to serve as a director, in the event of such an occurrence, proxies may be voted in the discretion of the persons named in the proxy for a substitute designated by the Board, unless the Board decides to reduce the number of directors constituting the Board. Each nominee shall be elected if the votes cast in favor of a nominee by the holders of shares of our common stock present or represented and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present exceed the votes cast against a nominee.

NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR

The following sets forth information provided by the nominees as of April 20, 2017. All of the nominees are currently serving as directors for the Company. All of the nominees have consented to serve if elected by our stockholders.

Phillip Frost, M.D. Dr. Frost has been the CEO and Chairman of the Company and has served on the Board since March 2007. Dr. Frost was named Chairman of the Board of Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc. (“Ladenburg Thalmann”) (NYSE MKT:LTS), an investment banking, asset management, and securities brokerage firm providing services through its principal operating subsidiary, Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc., in July 2006 and has been a director of Ladenburg Thalmann from 2001 until 2002 and again since 2004. Dr. Frost is Vice Chairman of Cogint, Inc. (NASDAQ MKT:COGT), an information solutions provider focused on the data-fusion market, and a director for each of Castle Brands (NYSE MKT:ROX), a developer and marketer of premium brand spirits, Cocrystal Pharma, Inc. (OTCBB:COCP), a publicly traded biotechnology company developing new treatments for viral diseases, and Sevion Therapeutics, Inc. (OTCBB:SVON), a clinical stage company which discovers and develops next-generation biologics for the treatment of cancer and immunological diseases. He serves as a member of the Board of Trustees of the University of Miami, the Skolkovo Foundation Scientific Advisory Council in Russia, the Shanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies in China, and The Florida Council of 100 and as a Trustee of each of the Miami Jewish Home for the Aged and the Mount Sinai Medical Center. Dr. Frost served as a director of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Limited, or Teva (NYSE:TEVA) from January 2006 until February 2015 and had served as Chairman of the Board of Teva from March 2010 until December 2014 and as Vice Chairman from January 2006 until March 2010. Dr. Frost previously served as a director for TransEnterix, Inc., SafeStitch Medical Inc. prior to its merger with TransEnterix, Inc. and PROLOR Biotech, Inc. prior to its acquisition by the Company in August 2013, as Governor and Co-Vice Chairman of the American Stock Exchange (now NYSE MKT), and as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Scripps Research Institute until November 2012. Dr. Frost had served as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of IVAX Corporation (“IVAX”) from 1987 until its acquisition by Teva in January 2006. Dr. Frost was Chairman of the Board of Directors of Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 1972 until the acquisition of Key Pharmaceuticals by Schering Plough Corporation in 1986.

6

Dr. Frost has successfully founded several pharmaceutical companies and overseen the development and commercialization of a multitude of pharmaceutical products. This combined with his experience as a physician and chairman and/or chief executive officer of large pharmaceutical companies has given him insight into virtually every facet of the pharmaceutical business and drug development and commercialization process. He is a demonstrated leader with keen business understanding and is uniquely positioned to help guide our Company through its transition from a development stage company into a successful, multinational biopharmaceutical and diagnostics company.

Jane H. Hsiao, Ph.D., MBA. Dr. Hsiao has served as Vice-Chairman and Chief Technical Officer of the Company since May 2007 and as a director since February 2007. Dr. Hsiao has served as Chairman of the Board of Non-Invasive Monitoring Systems, Inc. (OTCBB:NIMU), a medical device company, since October 2008 and was named Interim Chief Executive Officer of Non-Invasive Monitoring Systems, Inc. in February 2012. Dr. Hsiao is also a director of each of TransEnterix, Inc. (OTCBB:TRXC), a medical device company, Neovasc, Inc. (TSXV:NVC), a company developing and marketing medical specialty vascular devices, and Cocrystal Pharma, Inc. (OTCBB: COCP). Dr. Hsiao previously served as a director for Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc. (OTCBB:SRNE), a development stage biopharmaceutical company, PROLOR Biotech, Inc. prior to its acquisition by the Company in August 2013, and as Chairman of the Board of SafeSitch Medical, Inc. prior to its merger with TransEnterix, Inc. Dr. Hsiao served as the Vice Chairman-Technical Affairs of IVAX from 1995 to January 2006. Dr. Hsiao served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of IVAX Animal Health, IVAX’s veterinary products subsidiary, from 1998 to 2006.

Dr. Hsiao’s background in pharmaceutical chemistry and strong technical expertise, as well as her senior management experience, allow her to play an integral role in overseeing our product development and regulatory affairs and in navigating the regulatory pathways for our products and product candidates. In addition, as a result of her role as director and/or chairman of other companies in the biotechnology and life sciences space, she also has a keen understanding and appreciation of the many regulatory and development issues confronting pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies.

Steven D. Rubin. Mr. Rubin has served as Executive Vice President – Administration since May 2007 and as a director of the Company since February 2007. Mr. Rubin currently serves on the board of directors of VBI Vaccines, Inc. (NASDAQ:VBIV), a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical which develops, produces and markets next generation of vaccines to address unmet needs in infectious disease and immuno-oncology, Cogint, Inc. (NASDAQ MKT: COGT), an information solutions provider focused on the data-fusion market, Kidville, Inc. (OTCBB:KVIL), which operates large, upscale facilities, catering to newborns through five-year-old children and their families and offers a wide range of developmental classes for newborns to five-year-olds, Non-Invasive Monitoring Systems, Inc. (OTCBB:NIMU), a medical device company, Cocrystal Pharma, Inc. (OTCBB: COCP), a publicly traded biotechnology company developing new treatments for viral diseases, Sevion Therapeutics, Inc. (OTCBB:SVON), a clinical stage company which discovers and develops next-generation biologics for the treatment of cancer and immunological diseases, Castle Brands, Inc. (NYSE MKT:ROX), a developer and marketer of premium brand spirits, Neovasc, Inc. (TSXV:NVC), a company developing and marketing medical specialty vascular devices, and ChromaDex Corp. (NASDAQ:CDXC), an innovator of proprietary health, wellness and nutritional ingredients that creates science-based solutions for dietary supplement, food and beverage, skin care, sports nutrition, and pharmaceutical products. Mr. Rubin previously served as a director of Dreams, Inc. (NYSE MKT: DRJ), a vertically integrated sports licensing and products company, Safestitch Medical, Inc. prior to its merger with TransEnterix, Inc., SciVac Therapeutics, Inc. prior to its merger with VBI Vaccines, Inc., Tiger X Medical, Inc. prior to its merger with BioCardia, Inc., and PROLOR Biotech, Inc., prior to its acquisition by the Company in August 2013. Mr. Rubin served as the Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of IVAX from August 2001 until September 2006.

Mr. Rubin brings extensive leadership, business, and legal experience, as well as tremendous knowledge of our business and the pharmaceutical industry generally, to the Board. He has advised pharmaceutical companies in several aspects of business, regulatory, transactional, and legal affairs for more than 25 years. His experience as a practicing lawyer, general counsel, management executive and board member to multiple public companies, including several pharmaceutical and life sciences companies, has given him broad understanding and expertise, particularly relating to strategic planning and acquisitions.

7

Richard M. Krasno, Ph.D. was appointed to the Company’s Board of Directors on February 9, 2017. Dr. Krasno served as the executive director of the William R. Kenan, Jr. Charitable Trust (the “Trust”) from 1999 to 2014 and, from 1999 to 2010, as president of the four affiliated William R. Kenan, Jr. Funds. Prior to joining the Trust, Dr. Krasno was the president of the Monterey Institute of International Studies in Monterey, California. From 2004 to 2012, Dr. Krasno also served as a director of the University of North Carolina Health Care System and served as chairman of the board of directors from 2009 to 2012. From 1981 to 1998, he served as president and chief executive officer of the Institute of International Education in New York. He also served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Education in Washington, D.C. from 1979 to 1980. Dr. Krasno currently serves as a director of Ladenburg Thalmann (NYSEMKT: LTS), Castle Brands, Inc. (NYSEMKT: ROX) and BioCardia, Inc. (OTCMKTS:BCDA). Dr. Krasno holds a Bachelor of Science from the University of Illinois and a Ph.D. from Stanford.

Dr. Krasno’s pertinent skills and experience, including his financial literacy and expertise, managerial experience and the knowledge he has attained through his service as a director of publicly-traded corporations will add valuable insight to our Board on a wide range of business and operational issues.

Richard A. Lerner, M.D. Dr. Lerner has served as a director of the Company since March 2007. Dr. Lerner served as President of The Scripps Research Institute, a private, non-profit biomedical research organization, from 1986 until 2011 and is currently serving as an institute professor. Dr. Lerner is a member of numerous scientific associations, including the National Academy of Science and the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Dr. Lerner serves as director of Sequenom, Inc. (NASDAQ:SQNM), a life sciences company. He is also a director for Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. (NASDAQ:ITCI) a biotechnology company. He previously served as a director of Kraft Foods, Inc. and Teva.

As a result of Dr. Lerner’s long tenure as president of a major biomedical research organization, he provides valuable business, scientific, leadership, and management expertise that helps drive strategic direction and expansion at OPKO. His experience and training as a physician and a scientist enables him to bring valuable advice to the Board, including a critical perspective on drug discovery and development and providing a fundamental understanding of the potential pathways contributing to disease.

John A. Paganelli. Mr. Paganelli has served as a director of the Company since December 2003. Mr. Paganelli served as the Company’s Interim Chief Executive Officer and secretary from June 29, 2005 through March 27, 2007, the Company’s Interim Chief Financial Officer from June 29, 2005 through July 1, 2005, and Chairman of our Board from December 2003 through March 27, 2007. Mr. Paganelli served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Transamerica Life Insurance Company of New York from 1992 to 1997. Since 1987, Mr. Paganelli has been a partner in RFG Associates, a financial planning organization. Mr. Paganelli is also the Managing Partner of Pharos Systems Partners, LLC, an investment company, and he is Chairman of the Board of Pharos Systems International, a software company. He was Vice President and Executive Vice President of PEG Capital Management, an investment advisory organization, from 1987 until 2000. From 1980 to January 2003, Mr. Paganelli was an officer and director-stockholder of Mike Barnard Chevrolet, Inc., an automobile dealership. Mr. Paganelli also serves as a director of Western New York Energy, LLC and is on the Board of Trustees of Paul Smith’s College.

With his significant experience in investment management and operations, Mr. Paganelli is able to add valuable expertise and insight to our Board on a wide range of operational and financial issues. As one of the longest tenured members of our Board, he also has substantial knowledge and familiarity regarding our historical operations.

Richard C. Pfenniger, Jr. Mr. Pfenniger is a private investor and has served as a director of the Company since January 2008. Mr. Pfenniger served as Interim CEO of Vein Clinics of America, Inc., a privately held company that specializes in the treatment of vein disease, from May 2014 to February 2015 and as Interim CEO of IntegraMed America, Inc., a privately held company that manages outpatient fertility medical centers, from January 2013 to June 2013. He served as Chief Executive Officer and President for Continucare Corporation (NYSE:CNU), a provider of primary care physician and practice management services, from October 2003 until October 2011, and served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Continucare Corporation from September 2002 until October 2011. Previously, Mr. Pfenniger served as the Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of Whitman Education Group, Inc. from 1997 through June 2003. Prior to joining Whitman, he served as the Chief Operating Officer of IVAX from 1994 to 1997, and, from 1989 to 1994, he served as the Senior Vice President-Legal Affairs and General

8

Counsel of IVAX Corporation. Mr. Pfenniger currently serves as a director of GP Strategies Corporation (NYSE:GPX), a corporate education and training company, TransEnterix, Inc. (OTCBB:TRXC), a medical device company, BioCardia, Inc. (OTCMKTS:BCDA), clinical-stage regenerative medicine company developing novel therapeutics for cardiovascular diseases, Wright Investors’ Services Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB:WISH), an investment management and financial advisory firm, IntegraMed America and Vein Clinics of America. He previously served as a director of Safestitch Medical, Inc. prior to its merger with TransEnterix, Inc.

As a result of Mr. Pfenniger’s multi-faceted experience as chief executive officer, chief operating officer and general counsel, he is able to provide valuable business, leadership, and management advice to the Board in many critical areas. In addition, Mr. Pfenniger’s knowledge of the pharmaceutical and healthcare business has given him insights on many aspects of our business and the markets in which we operate. Mr. Pfenniger also brings financial expertise to the Board, including through his service as Chairman of our Audit Committee.

Alice Lin-Tsing Yu, M.D., Ph.D. Dr. Yu was appointed to the Company’s Board in April 2009. Since mid-2013, Dr. Yu has served as Distinguished Chair Professor and Co-Director of The Institute of Stem Cell & Translational Cancer Research at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. From 2003 to May, 2013, Dr. Yu served as Distinguished Research Fellow and Associate Director at the Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, in Taiwan. She has also served as a Professor of Pediatrics for the University of California in San Diego since 1994. Previously, she was the Chief of Pediatric Hematology Oncology at the University of California in San Diego. Dr. Yu has also served in several government-appointed positions and is a member of numerous scientific committees and associations.

Dr. Yu is an accomplished physician, professor, and researcher who brings a unique perspective to our Board on a variety of healthcare related issues. As a pioneer in immunotherapy of neuroblastoma, Dr. Yu was instrumental in developing a monoclonal anti-GD2 (Dinutuximab) from IND thru early phase studies and phase III trial, facilitating its FDA approval on March 10, 2015. The insight and experience gained from her distinguished record of achievement at several highly respected academic medical institutions, as well as her experience as a practicing physician, will be valuable to our efforts to develop and commercialize our pipeline of diagnostic and therapeutic products.

OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

9

Identification of Executive Officers

Set forth below is the name and age as of April 20, 2017 of each of our current executive officers, together with certain biographical information for each of them (other than Phillip Frost, Jane H. Hsiao, and Steven Rubin, for whom age, title and biographical information is included above under “Nominees for Election of Directors”):

Adam Logal. Mr. Logal has served as OPKO’s Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since March 2014 and he served as OPKO’s Vice President of Finance, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer from July 2012 until March 2014 and as OPKO’s Director of Finance, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer from March 2007 until July 2012. He currently serves on the board of directors of VBI Vaccines, Inc. (NASDAQ:VBIV), a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical which develops, produces and markets next generation of vaccines to address unmet needs in infectious disease and immuno-oncology. From 2002 to 2007, Mr. Logal served in senior management of Nabi Biopharmaceuticals, a publicly traded, biopharmaceutical company engaged in the development and commercialization of proprietary products. Mr. Logal held various positions of increasing responsibility at Nabi Biopharmaceuticals, last serving as Senior Director of Accounting and Reporting.

Identification of Certain Other Officers

Set forth below is the name of certain other officers important to our organization and biographical information for each of them:

David Okrongly, PhD. Dr. Okrongly, age 58, joined OPKO Health in July 2013 as President of OPKO Diagnostics. Dr. Okrongly was with Bayer Diagnostics and Siemens Healthcare from 1997 to 2009, where he was the leader of the global R&D organization, launching industry-leading platforms in immunoassay, hematology, clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics and after the Siemens acquisition of Bayer Diagnostics in 2006, he was appointed Senior Vice President in charge of the Molecular Diagnostics Business Unit until 2009. Immediately prior to joining OPKO, Dr. Okrongly was COO at Exosome Diagnostics from 2011 to 2013 and President and CEO of Quanterix Corporation from 2009 to 2011. He has a Ph.D. in Chemistry from Columbia University and a Bachelor of Science degree with Honors in Chemistry from the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Charles W. Bishop, PhD. Dr. Bishop, age 65, has served as CEO of OPKO Renal since the acquisition of Cytochroma Inc. in March 2013. Dr. Bishop had served as President & CEO of Cytochroma since June 2006. Dr. Bishop co-founded Proventiv Therapeutics, LLC in September 2005 where he served as President. Proventiv and its lead drug, Rayaldee™, were acquired by Cytochroma in June 2006. During the period of September 1987 to June 2005, Dr. Bishop held various senior management positions at Bone Care International, Inc. (NASDAQ:BCII), a public specialty pharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing vitamin D hormone therapies. Dr. Bishop’s positions with Bone Care included President, CEO, Director, Executive Vice President of Research and Development, and Chief Scientific Officer. Bone Care was acquired for $720 million by Genzyme Corporation in July 2005. Prior to joining Bone Care, Dr. Bishop held various management positions in the Health Care Division of the Procter & Gamble Company. Dr. Bishop completed a four-year National Institutes of Health Postdoctoral Fellowship in vitamin D Biochemistry at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and received his PhD degree in Nutritional Biochemistry from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, after earning an undergraduate degree in Chemistry from the University of Virginia.

Gregory Stephen Henderson, M.D., PhD. Dr. Henderson, age 54, has served as the President of Bio-Reference Laboratories, Inc. since March 2016. Previously, Dr. Henderson served as Vice Chairman of Pathology Outreach and Laboratory Affairs Department of Pathology, Mt. Sinai Health Network from 2014 until joining the Company in March 2016. Prior to his position with Mt. Sinai, he was Founder and President of Pacific Pathology Partners, PLLC from 2012 through 2015 and President of PAKC Laboratories, Bremerton, WA from 2007 through 2014. He served as the Vice Chairman of Pathology at the Ochsner Health System in New Orleans during and after the Hurricane Katrina disaster from 2005 through 2007. He was a senior partner with Wilmington Pathology Associates and a founder of NextWave Diagnostic Laboratories in Wilmington, NC from 1998 through 2005. Dr. Henderson obtained his M.D and PhD degrees from Vanderbilt University School of Medicine as a Medical Scientist Training Program Fellow, and he obtained an undergraduate degree in Biochemistry from Tulane University. His anatomic pathology residency training was at Johns Hopkins Hospital and his laboratory medicine

10

residency training was at University of Utah/ARUP Laboratories. His fellowship training in breast, gynecologic, and oncologic pathology was also at Vanderbilt University.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) and trades under the symbol “OPK”. Prior to its transfer to the NASDAQ in June 2016, OPKO’s stock was listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Since August 2013, our common stock has been traded on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange. Pursuant to the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws and the Delaware General Corporation Law, our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board. Directors are kept informed of the Company’s business through discussions with management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and other senior officers, by reviewing materials provided to them and by participating in meetings of the Board and its committees.

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all employees, officers, and directors of the Company. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website: www.opko.com under Investor Relations. If the Company makes any substantive amendments to, or grants a waiver (including an implicit waiver) from, a provision of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, and that relates to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K, promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), we will disclose such amendment or waiver on our website.

Director Independence

In evaluating the independence of each of our directors and director nominees, the Board considers transactions and relationships between each director or nominee, or any member of his or her immediate family, and the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates. The Board also examines transactions and relationships between directors and director nominees or their known affiliates and members of the Company’s senior management and their known affiliates. The purpose of this review is to determine whether any such relationships or transactions are inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent under applicable laws and regulations and NASDAQ listing standards. In 2016, the Board affirmatively determined that a majority of our directors serving at that time, including Messrs. Robert Baron, Dmitry Kolosov, John A. Paganelli, and Richard C. Pfenniger, Jr., and Drs. Richard A. Lerner and Alice Lin-Tsing Yu, were “independent” directors within the meaning of the listing standards of NASDAQ and applicable law. In addition, the Board also determined that Dr. Richard Krasno was independent under applicable law and the listing standards of NASDAQ upon his appointment to the Board in February 2017 to fill the vacancy created by Mr. Baron’s resignation in January 2017. In making the independence determinations, the Board considered a number of factors and relationships, including without limitation (i) Dr. Frost’s service on the Board of Directors for Continucare Corporation until October 2011, an entity for which Mr. Pfenniger served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and President until October 2011; (ii) Dr. Frost’s membership on the Board of Trustees for the Scripps Research Institute (“TSRI”), a 501(c)(3) entity for which Dr. Lerner served as President until December 2011; (iii) Dr. Frost’s service as Chairman of the Board of Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc., an entity in which Dr. Frost beneficially owns more than ten percent (10%) and for which Dr. Krasno serves as a member of the Board of Directors; (iv) Drs. Frost’s and Krasno’s and Mr. Rubin’s service as members of the Board of Directors of Castle Brands, Inc., an entity in which Dr. Frost beneficially owns more than ten percent (10%); (v) Mr. Pfenniger’s and Dr Krasno’s service as members of the Board of Directors of Biocardia, Inc., formerly Tiger X Medical, Inc., an entity in which Dr. Frost beneficially owns more than ten percent (10%); (vi) Mr. Rubin’s previous service as Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer and as a member of the Board of Directors of Tiger X Medical, Inc. until its merger with Biocardia, Inc. in October 2016; (vii) Dmitry Kolosov’s stock option awards for exceptional Board service on November 4, 2013 (valued at $87,250) and March 18, 2015 (valued at $58,400); (viii) the Company’s investments in Zebra Biologics, Inc. (“Zebra”), an entity for which Dr. Lerner is the founder and currently serves as a director and scientific advisor; and (ix) Dr. Yu’s prior service as a Distinguished Research Fellow and Associate Director at the Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, a Taiwanese entity from which the Company licenses technology.

11

Board Leadership Structure

The Company is led by Dr. Frost, who has served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board since March 2007. Six of our current directors satisfy NASDAQ independence requirements. Our Board also includes two management directors other than Dr. Frost. The Company does not have a member of our Board who is formally identified as the lead independent director. However, independent directors head each of our Board’s three standing committees — the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and each of the committees is comprised solely of independent directors.

Although the Board does not have a formal policy on whether the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board should be separated, we believe that our current Board leadership structure is suitable for us. The Chief Executive Officer is the individual selected by the Board to manage our Company on a day to day basis, and his direct involvement in our business operations makes him best positioned to lead productive Board strategic planning sessions and determine the time allocated to each agenda item in discussions of our Company’s short- and long-term objectives.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

The Board’s role in the risk oversight process includes receiving regular reports from members of senior management on areas of material risk to the Company, including operational, financial, legal and regulatory, and strategic and reputational risks. In connection with its reviews of the operations of the Company’s business units and corporate functions, the Board considers and addresses the primary risks associated with those units and functions. Our full Board regularly engages in discussions of the most significant risks that the Company is facing and how these risks are being managed.

In addition, each of the Board’s committees, and particularly the Audit Committee, plays a role in overseeing risk management issues that fall within each committee’s areas of responsibility as described below under the heading “Standing Committees of the Board of Directors.” Senior management reports on at least a quarterly basis to the Audit Committee on the most significant risks facing the Company from a financial reporting perspective and highlights any new risks that may have arisen since the Audit Committee last met. The Audit Committee also meets regularly in executive sessions with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and reports any findings or issues to the full Board. In performing its functions, the Audit Committee and each standing committee of the Board has full access to management, as well as the ability to engage advisors. The Board receives regular reports from each of its standing committees regarding each committee’s particularized areas of focus.

Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors

Our Board met six times during fiscal 2016. In fiscal 2016, all incumbent directors attended 75% or more of the Board meetings and meetings of the committees on which they served, with the exception of Drs. Lerner and Yu and Mr. Paganelli.

Although we encourage each member of our Board to attend our annual meetings of stockholders, we do not have a formal policy requiring the members of our Board to attend. Nine members of our Board attended the annual meeting of stockholders during fiscal 2016.

Executive Sessions; Presiding Director

Our non-management directors meet separately from the Board on a regular basis. Our independent directors meet in executive session from time to time as needed, but not less than twice annually. Our non-management or independent directors, as applicable, may choose a presiding director by majority vote for each session. The presiding director is responsible for, among other things, presiding at the executive session for which he or she is chosen to serve and apprising the Chairman of the issues considered at such meetings.

Standing Committees of the Board of Directors

Our Board maintains several standing committees, including a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Governance Committee, and a separately designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. These committees

12

and their functions are described below. Our Board may also establish various other committees to assist it in its responsibilities. Our Board has adopted a written charter for each of its standing committees. The full text of each charter is available on our website at http://www.opko.com.

The following table shows the current members (indicated by an “X” or “Chair”) of each of our standing Board committees:

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee oversees our corporate accounting and financial reporting process. Our Audit Committee met nine times during fiscal 2016. The responsibilities of our Audit Committee are set forth in a written charter adopted by our Board of Directors and reviewed and reassessed from on an annual basis by the Audit Committee. Among other things, our Audit Committee:

13

Our Audit Committee is composed of Messrs. Pfenniger (Chairman) and Paganelli, and Dr. Krasno, who was appointed to the Board of Directors and Audit Committee in February 2017. Mr. Baron served on the Audit Committee until January 23, 2017, and Mr. Kolosov temporarily served on the Audit Committee from January 23, 2017, following Mr. Baron’s resignation, until the appointment of Dr. Krasno on February 9, 2017. Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Pfenniger, who is independent (as independence for audit committee members is defined in NASDAQ listing standards and applicable SEC rules), is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee reviews and approves, on behalf of the Board, (i) annual salaries, bonuses, and other compensation for our executive officers, and (ii) employee benefit plans for our employees and executive officers. Our Compensation Committee recommends to the Board for approval, (i) compensation for the Company’s directors, and (ii) incentive compensation plans, equity plans and deferred compensation plans. Our Compensation Committee also oversees our compensation policies and practices. Our Compensation Committee met nine times during fiscal 2016. Our Compensation Committee may from time to time establish a subcommittee to perform any action required to be performed by a committee of “non-employee directors” pursuant to Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act and “outside directors” pursuant to Rule 162(m) under the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

Our Compensation Committee also performs the following functions related to executive compensation:

The Compensation Committee relies heavily on the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer concerning compensation actions for our other executive officers and may engage compensation consultants if the Compensation Committee deems it appropriate. In deciding upon the appropriate level of compensation for our executive officers, the Compensation Committee also reviews our compensation programs relative to our strategic objectives and market practice and other changing business and market conditions. To date, neither the Compensation Committee nor management has engaged a compensation consultant in determining or recommending the amount or form of director or officer compensation.

Our Compensation Committee is composed of Drs. Lerner (Chairman) and Krasno. Mr. Baron served on the Compensation Committee until January 23, 2017, and Dr. Krasno was appointed to the Compensation Committee on February 9, 2017. Mr. Paganelli served on the Compensation Committee until March 30, 2017. We believe that the composition and functioning of our Compensation Committee complies with all applicable requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the NASDAQ, and the SEC’s rules and regulations, including those regarding the independence of our Compensation Committee members.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the individuals serving on the Compensation Committee during fiscal year 2016 were at any time during fiscal year 2016, an officer or employee of the Company and, other than Mr. Paganelli, none have served as a former officer of the Company.

14

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

Our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s responsibilities include the selection of potential candidates for our Board, making recommendations to our Board concerning the structure and membership of the other Board committees, and considering director candidates recommended by others, including our Chief Executive Officer, other Board members, third parties, and stockholders. Our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is composed of Dr. Lerner and Mr. Paganelli. Mr. Baron served on the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee until January 23, 2017, and Mr. Paganelli was appointed to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee on February 9, 2017. Our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee took action by written consent on two occasions during fiscal 2016. We believe that the composition of our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee complies with applicable requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the NASDAQ, and the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “SEC”) rules and regulations, including those regarding the independence of our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee members.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee identifies director nominees through a combination of referrals, including by existing members of the Board, management, third parties, stockholders, and direct solicitations, where warranted. Once a candidate has been identified, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the individual’s experience and background, and may discuss the proposed nominee with the source of the recommendation. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee usually believes it to be appropriate for committee members to interview the proposed nominee before making a final determination on whether to recommend the individual as a nominee to the entire Board to stand for election to the Board. The Committee does not plan to evaluate candidates identified by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee differently from those recommended by a stockholder or otherwise.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee recommended to the Board that it nominate each of the Drs. Frost, Hsiao, Krasno, Lerner and Yu and Messrs. Rubin, Paganelli, and Pfenniger for election at the 2017 Annual Meeting.

Director Selection Criteria

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the appropriate qualifications, skills, and experience expected of individual members and of the Board as a whole with the objective of having a Board with sound judgment and diverse backgrounds and experience to represent stockholder interests.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee believes that nominees for election to the Board should possess sufficient business or financial experience and a willingness to devote the time and effort necessary to discharge the responsibilities of a director. This experience can include, but is not limited to, service on other boards of directors or active involvement with other boards of directors, experience in the industries in which the Company conducts its business, audit and financial expertise, clinical experience, operational experience, or a scientific or medical background. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee does not believe that nominees for election to the Board should be selected through mechanical application of specified criteria. Rather, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee believes that the qualifications and strengths of individuals should be considered in their totality with a view to nominating persons for election to the Board whose backgrounds, integrity, and personal characteristics indicate that they will make a positive contribution to the Board.

While we do not have a formal diversity policy with respect to Board composition, the Board believes it is important for the Board to have diversity of knowledge base, professional experience and skills, and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee takes these qualities into account when considering director nominees for recommendation to the Board.

Dr. Krasno was recommended to the Board by the Company’s management in February 2017 and was appointed a Director of the Company by the Board to fill the vacancy from Mr. Baron’s resignation.

Stockholder Nominations

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee does not have a written policy with regard to consideration of director candidates recommended by stockholders. Nevertheless, it is the Corporate Governance

15

and Nominating Committee’s policy to consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. Stockholders who wish to recommend candidates for election to the Board must do so in writing. The recommendation should be sent to the Secretary of the Company, OPKO Health, Inc., 4400 Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida 33137, who will forward the recommendation to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The recommendation must set forth (i) the name and address as they appear on the Company’s books of the stockholder making the recommendation, the telephone number of such stockholder, and the name, address and telephone number of any beneficial owner, and the class and number of shares of capital stock of the Company owned of record by such stockholder and beneficially owned by such beneficial owner, (ii) the name of the candidate and all information relating to the candidate that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors under the SEC’s proxy rules, (iii) a description of all relationships between the candidate and the recommending stockholder and any agreements or understandings between the recommending stockholder and the candidate regarding the nomination, and (iv) a description of all relationships between the candidate and any of the Company’s competitors, customers, suppliers, labor unions (if any) and any other persons with special interests regarding the Company. The recommendation must be accompanied by the candidate’s written consent to being named in the Company’s proxy statement as a nominee for election to the Board and to serving as a director, if elected, and by a representation from the stockholder and beneficial owner, if any, that such stockholder and beneficial owner intend to appear in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and intend to continue to hold the reported shares through the date of the Company’s next annual meeting of stockholders. Stockholders must also comply with all requirements of the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws with respect to nomination of persons for election to the Board.

Communications with the Board

All interested parties may initiate in writing any communication with our Board, the presiding member of the non-management directors, or any individual director by sending the correspondence to OPKO Health, Inc., 4400 Biscayne Blvd., Miami, Florida 33137, Attention: Secretary. This centralized process assists our Board in reviewing and responding to communications in an appropriate manner. If an interested party would like the letter to be forwarded directly to one of the Chairmen of the three standing committees of the Board, he or she should so indicate. If no specific direction is indicated, the Secretary’s office will review the letter and forward it to the appropriate Board member(s).

Employee Communications with the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee has established procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting and auditing matters. These procedures are described in our OPKO Health, Inc. Policy on Reporting Unlawful Conduct and Prohibiting Retaliation Against Reporting Employees.

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

Frost Gamma Investments Trust (the “Gamma Trust”), a trust controlled by Dr. Phillip Frost, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Jane H. Hsiao, our Vice Chairman and Chief Technical Officer, and Steven D. Rubin, our Executive Vice President – Administration and a member of our Board, are each members of The Frost Group, LLC (the “Frost Group”), an entity which beneficially owns approximately 3.59% of our common stock as of April 14, 2017. Furthermore, the Gamma Trust beneficially owns approximately 32.35% of our common stock as of April 14, 2017. Jane Hsiao beneficially owns approximately 5.70% of our common stock as of April 14, 2017, and Mr. Rubin beneficially owns less than 5% of our common stock as of April 14, 2017.

Effective January 1, 2014, we entered into a five-year lease with Frost Real Estate Holdings, LLC (“Frost Holdings”), an entity which is controlled by Dr. Phillip Frost, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, which was amended on July 28, 2014, May 28, 2015, and January 1, 2017. The lease, as amended, is for approximately 29,000 square feet of space. The lease provides for payments of approximately $81 thousand per month increasing annually to $86 thousand per month in 2018 – 2019, plus applicable sales taxes. The rent is inclusive of operating expenses, property taxes and parking. The rent was reduced by $216 thousand for the cost of tenant improvements.

We hold investments in Cocrystal Pharma, Inc. (“COCP”)(8%), Zebra Biologics, Inc. (“Zebra”)(28%), Sevion Therapeutics, Inc. (“Sevion”)(3%), Neovasc, Inc. (4%), ChromaDex Corporation (2%), MabVax Therapeutics

16

Holdings, Inc. (“MabVax”)(4%), Non-Invasive Monitoring Systems, Inc. (1%), Biocardia, Inc. (“Biocardia”)(5%), and ARNO Therapeutics, Inc. (“ARNO”)( 5%). These investments were considered related party transactions as a result of our executive management’s ownership interests and/or board representation in these entities.

We reimburse Dr. Frost for Company-related use by Dr. Frost and our other executives of an airplane owned by a company that is beneficially owned by Dr. Frost, including out-of-pocket operating costs. We do not reimburse Dr. Frost for personal use of the airplane by Dr. Frost or any other executive. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we reimbursed Dr. Frost approximately $298 thousand and $595 thousand, respectively, for Company-related travel by Dr. Frost and other OPKO executives.

In January 2016, we invested an additional $250 thousand in ARNO for 714,285 shares of its common stock and in August 2016, we invested an additional $250 thousand in ARNO for 714,285 shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase 357,142 shares of its common stock.

Effective May 1, 2013, we entered into an agreement with Dr. Hsiao pursuant to which we have the right to utilize approximately 5,000 square feet of laboratory space in Taiwan, inclusive of any and all utility costs, taxes and building maintenance fees. In addition, Dr. Hsiao provides certain other services to us relating to government grant work in Taiwan, as well as the coordination of work flow between our U.S. and Taiwanese operations. The term of the agreement is for five years and obligates us to pay Dr. Hsiao approximately $60,000 annually. The agreement was terminated by mutual agreement of the parties effective February 1, 2017.

In August 2016, we invested an additional $1.0 million in MabVax for 207,900 shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase 415,800 shares of its common stock.

In September 2016, we invested an additional $2.0 million in COCP for 4,878,050 shares of its common stock. Drs. Frost and Hsiao and Mr. Rubin serve on the Board of Directors of COCP.

In October 2016, we entered into a consulting agreement to provide strategic advisory services to BioCardia. In connection with the consulting agreement, BioCardia granted us 5,027,726 common stock options. In December 2016, we purchased 19,230,769 shares of BioCardia from Dr. Frost for $2.5 million. We have also purchased shares of BioCardia in the open market. BioCardia is a related party as a result of our executive management’s ownership interest and board representation in BioCardia and its predecessor, Tiger X Medical, Inc. In October 2016, BioCardia completed its merger with Tiger X Medical, Inc., to which Tiger X Medical, Inc. was the surviving entity and the name of the issuer was changed to BioCardia. Dr. Krasno and Mr. Pfenniger serve on the Board of Directors of BioCardia.

In November 2016, we made a $150 thousand loan to Sevion and in February 2017, we made a $250 thousand loan to Sevion. The loans accrue interest at 6% per annum and have a term of six months and one year, respectively. Each loan is convertible into shares of Sevion common stock. No amounts have been paid.

In November 2016, we entered into a Pledge Agreement with the Museum of Science, Inc. and the Museum of Science Endowment Fund, Inc. pursuant to which we will contribute an aggregate of $1.0 million over a four-year period for constructing, equipping and the general operation of the Frost Science Museum. Dr. Frost and Mr. Pfenniger serve on the Board of Trustees of the Frost Science Museum and Mr. Pfenniger is the Vice Chairman of the Board of Trustees.

Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Bio-Reference, purchases and uses certain products acquired from InCellDx, Inc., a company in which we hold a 27% minority interest and which Mr. Rubin serves on the Board of Directors.

Our Policies Regarding Related Party Transactions

We have adopted a written statement of policy with respect to related party transactions, which is administered by our Audit Committee. Under our related party transaction policy, a “Related Party Transaction” is any transaction, arrangement, or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements, or relationships) in which the Company or any of our subsidiaries was, is or will be a participant and the amount exceeds $100,000 and in which any Related Person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. A “Related Person” is any of our executive officers, directors or director nominees, any stockholder beneficially owning in excess of 5% of our stock or securities exchangeable for our stock, any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons, and

17

any firm, corporation, or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed, is a partner or principal or in a similar position, or in which such person has a 5% or greater beneficial ownership interest in such entity.

It is the Company’s policy to enter into or ratify Related Party Transactions only when the Audit Committee determines that the Related Party Transaction in question is in, or is not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company. In making this determination, the Audit Committee may take into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the Related Party Transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the Related Person’s interest in the transaction. Pursuant to the Company’s policy, the Audit Committee has granted standing pre-approval to certain types of Related Party Transactions that are considered to be in, or consistent with, the best interests of the Company.

Pursuant to our related party transaction policy, a Related Party Transaction may only be consummated if:

If advance approval of a Related Party Transaction is not feasible, then that Related Party Transaction will be considered and, if our Audit Committee determines it to be appropriate, ratified, at its next regularly scheduled meeting. If we decide to proceed with a Related Party Transaction without advance approval, then the terms of such Related Party Transaction must permit termination by us without further material obligation in the event our Audit Committee ratification is not forthcoming at our Audit Committee’s next regularly scheduled meeting.

Transactions with Related Persons, though not classified as Related Party Transactions by our related party transaction policy and thus not subject to its review and approval requirements, may still need to be disclosed if required by the applicable securities laws, rules, and regulations.

All transactions listed above were approved in accordance with the Company’s related party transaction policy.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Each non-employee director is currently entitled to receive an annual retainer of $20,000, payable in quarterly installments, an option to acquire 40,000 shares of the Company’s common stock upon initial appointment to the Board and an option to acquire 20,000 shares each year thereafter on the date of the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. The chairman of each committee of the Board will also receive an additional annual retainer of $5,000, payable in quarterly installments. The members of the Compensation Committee also receive an additional annual retainer of $5,000, payable in quarterly installments and members of the Audit Committee receive an additional annual retainer of $10,000, payable in quarterly installments. The chairman of the Audit Committee is entitled to receive an option to acquire 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock each year on the date of the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders.

Prior to July 1, 2016, each non-employee director was entitled to receive an annual retainer of $10,000, payable in quarterly installments, an option to acquire 40,000 shares of the Company’s common stock upon initial appointment to the Board and an option to acquire 20,000 shares each year thereafter on the date of the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. The chairman of each committee of the Board received an additional annual retainer of $5,000, payable in quarterly installments, and the members of the Audit Committee, excluding the Chairman, received an additional annual retainer of $2,500, payable in quarterly installments.

18

The following table sets forth information with respect to compensation of non-employee directors of the Company earned for fiscal year 2016.

Fiscal 2016 Director Compensation

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and holders of ten percent (10%) or more of our common stock (collectively, “Reporting Persons”) to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and any other equity securities. Based on a review of the copies of the reports furnished to us, the Reporting Persons complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements, except for three late Form 4 reports filed by Jane Hsiao on March 15, 2016 to report purchases of the Company’s common stock on March 8, 2016, March 9, 2016 and March 10, 2016.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Our compensation philosophy is to attract and retain talented and dedicated executives who will work to achieve our desired business direction, strategy, and performance. The primary goals of our compensation program for our Named Executive Officers (as defined in the Summary Compensation Table) are (i) to attract, motivate, and retain talented executives with the skill sets and expertise we need to meet our scientific and business objectives; (ii) to be competitive in the marketplace; (iii) to tie annual and long-term cash and equity incentives to the achievement of specified performance objectives that will result in increased stockholder value; and (iv) to be cost-effective. To achieve these goals, we have formed a compensation committee that reviews and approves the executive

19

compensation packages for our executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers. These packages are generally based on a mix of salary, discretionary bonus, and equity awards. Although we have not adopted any formal guidelines for allocating total compensation between equity compensation and cash compensation, we maintain compensation plans that tie a substantial portion of our executives’ overall compensation to the achievement of corporate goals and success of the Company.

Benchmarking of Cash and Equity Compensation

Our Compensation Committee typically reviews executive compensation levels on an annual basis to ensure they remain competitive in our industry. Data for this review is prepared and provided to the Compensation Committee by our management and human resources department, with input from our Chief Executive Officer, as well as other members of senior management. This data details relevant market rates for executive base salaries, annual cash incentive, long-term incentive, and total compensation for companies of similar size or stage of development within our industry or companies who perform similar services or have similar product offerings and market opportunities. In connection with executive compensation changes implemented in 2016, among other considerations, the Compensation Committee reviewed an internally generated report prepared by management and human resources surveying compensation practices of approximately thirteen biotech, pharmaceutical, and laboratory companies ranging from relatively small companies in terms of revenue and size of operations to large multi-national companies with substantial revenue. While the internally generated report did not yield a comprehensive group of true peer companies due, in part, to the Company’s unique and multi-faceted business which includes pharmaceuticals, biologics, diagnostics, and clinical and genetic laboratory testing services, we believe the report provided the Compensation Committee useful comparative pay information. Utilizing the compiled information, the Compensation Committee in fiscal year 2016 reviewed the various components of our executive compensation to determine the base salary, annual cash incentive, long term incentive, and equity compensation. We may retain the services of third-party executive compensation specialists from time to time in connection with the establishment of cash and equity compensation and related policies, although we have not previously done so.

Elements of Compensation

We evaluate individual executive performance with a goal of setting compensation at levels the Board and the Compensation Committee believe are comparable with executives in other companies of similar size and stage of development or companies which have similar product and service offerings or market opportunities. At the same time, our Board and Compensation Committee take into account our relative performance and our own strategic goals. The primary elements of our compensation plans are base salary, equity compensation, and discretionary annual bonus, each of which is described in greater detail below.

Base Salary. We try to establish and maintain competitive annual base salaries for our Named Executive Officers by utilizing available resources, which include surveys as discussed above. While base salaries are not primarily performance-based, we believe it is important to provide adequate, fixed compensation to executives working in a highly volatile and competitive industry such as ours. We provide fixed salary compensation to our Named Executive Officers based on their responsibilities and individual experience, taking into account competitive market compensation paid by other companies for similar positions within the pharmaceutical, diagnostics and laboratory industries. In general, we historically targeted Named Executive Officer compensation and base salary to fall within the median range for equivalent or similar positions of executives at peer group companies. After considering the significant expansion of the Company’s business, revenues and operations since 2015, including the acquisition of Bio-Reference Laboratories, the nation’s third largest reference laboratory with more than 5,000 employees and $1 billion in revenues, the Compensation Committee approved increases in April 2016 for the base salaries for our Named Executive Officers. In determining to increase base salaries, the Committee also considered management’s significant experience in the industry and that the Company does not maintain a cash bonus or incentive plan.

Discretionary Annual Bonus. In addition to base salaries, our Compensation Committee has the authority to award discretionary annual bonuses to our Named Executive Officers based on corporate and individual performance. Incentives, as a percent of salary, increase with executive rank so that, as rank increases, a greater portion of total annual cash compensation is based on annual corporate and individual performance. Furthermore, as an executive’s rank increases, a greater percentage of that executive’s cash bonus is based on corporate performance, rather than individual performance. Because we historically generated little revenue, the

20

Compensation Committee has not awarded any cash bonuses to Named Executive Officers other than in 2015. In 2016, the Company did not award any cash incentive bonuses to any Named Executive Officer.

Equity Compensation. We believe that equity compensation should be a primary component of our executive compensation program because it aligns the interests of our executive officers with the long term performance of the Company. Stock options are a critical element of our long-term incentive strategy. The primary purpose of stock options is to provide Named Executive Officers and other employees with a personal and financial interest in our success through stock ownership, thereby aligning the interests of such persons with those of our stockholders. This broad-based program is a vital element of our goal to empower and motivate outstanding long-term contributions by our Named Executive Officers and other employees. The Compensation Committee believes that the value of stock options will reflect our performance over the long-term. Under our employee stock option program, options are granted at fair market value at the date of grant, and options granted under the program become exercisable only after a vesting period, which is subject to continued employment. Consequently, employees benefit from stock options only if the market value of our common stock increases over time. With respect to these stock options, we recognize compensation expense based on FASB ASC Topic 718.

The Compensation Committee typically grants stock options to our Named Executive Officers under the OPKO Health, Inc. 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2016 Equity Incentive Plan”) and previously the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. As with base salaries and discretionary cash bonuses, there is no set formula or performance criteria, which determines the amount of the equity award for our Named Executive Officers or our other employees. Nor does the Compensation Committee assign any relative weight to any specific factors or criteria it considers when granting stock options. Rather, the Committee exercises its judgment and discretion by considering all factors it deems relevant at the time of such grants, including the internally generated peer group survey previously discussed and the Company’s performance during the most recent fiscal year. For the Named Executive Officers, other than the Chief Executive Officer, the decisions by the Compensation Committee regarding grants of stock options are made based almost entirely upon the recommendation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and includes his subjective determination based on his assessment of the executive officer’s current position with the Company, the executive officer’s past and expected future performance and the other factors discussed in the determination of base salaries.

As discussed above, our Compensation Committee also considered compensation practices at the peer group companies, but recognized that the actual positioning of compensation for individual executives may range above or below the median average based on job content, experience and responsibilities of the roles compared to similar positions in the market. In determining grants of stock options made in April 2016, the Compensation Committee relied primarily on the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer for the Named Executive Officers other than the Chief Executive Officer. In determining the stock option award for the Chief Executive Officer in 2016, the Compensation Committee relied heavily on the Company’s accomplishments and growth, including the successful acquisitions of Bio-Reference Laboratories and EirGen Pharma, Ltd., significant growth in the Company’s revenue and employee base and size of its operations, the increasing complexity in the Company business and the many contributions the Chief Executive Officer made to the Company’s success. In determining stock option awards for the Named Executive Officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Committee also considered that the Company has no regular cash bonus or incentive program.

With limited exceptions, we have not granted employees restricted stock or restricted stock awards pursuant to our equity benefit plans. However, our Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may in the future elect to make such grants to our employees and our Named Executive Officers if it deems it advisable.

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

We conducted our first advisory vote on executive compensation at our 2011 Annual Meeting and then again at our 2014 Annual Meeting. While this vote is not binding on the Company, our Board, or our Compensation Committee, we believe that it is important for our stockholders to have an opportunity to vote on this proposal as a means to express their views regarding our executive compensation philosophy, our compensation policies and programs, and our decisions regarding executive compensation, all as disclosed in our proxy statement. Our Board of Directors and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and, to the extent there is any significant vote against the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the proxy statement, we will consider our stockholders’ concerns and the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are

21

necessary to address those concerns. Previously, the Company sought an advisory vote on executive compensation from its stockholders every three years. In response to recommendations from stockholder advisory groups and evolving good corporate governance practices, the Company now plans to seek the advisory vote from stockholders on an annual basis. In addition to our advisory vote on executive compensation, we are committed to ongoing engagement with our stockholders on executive compensation and corporate governance issues. These engagement efforts take place throughout the year through meetings, telephone calls and correspondence involving our senior management, directors and representatives of our stockholders.

At the 2014 Annual Meeting, more than 95% of the votes cast on the advisory vote on the executive compensation proposal were in favor of our named executive officer compensation as disclosed in the proxy statement, and as a result our named executive officer compensation was approved. Our Board and Compensation Committee reviewed these final vote results. Given the significant level of support, no changes to our executive compensation policies and decisions were necessary at that time based on the vote results. As noted above, we have determined that our stockholders should vote on a Say on Pay proposal every year. Therefore, we are holding a vote on Say on Pay this year, and the Company plans that the next Say on Pay vote after the 2017 Annual Meeting will be in 2018.

Employment Agreements. We have not entered into an employment agreement with any of our current executive officers.

Severance and Change-in-Control Benefits. Except as set forth below, none of our current executive officers are entitled to severance or change of control benefits; provided, however, that the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan provide for certain accelerated vesting upon change in control events. Adam Logal, our Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, is entitled to receive four months of paid salary and continued benefits if he is terminated without cause or he resigns for good reason.

401(k) Profit Sharing Plan. We have adopted a tax-qualified 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) covering all qualified employees. The effective date of the 401(k) Plan is January 2008. Participants may elect a salary reduction of at least 1% as a contribution to the 401(k) Plan, up to the statutorily prescribed annual limit for tax-deferred contributions ($18,000 for employees under age 50 and an additional $6,000 for employees 50 and above in 2015). In 2008, the Company adopted the Roth contribution for employee elections. The 401(k) Plan permits employer matching of up to 4% of a participant’s salary up to the statutory limits. In 2010, we elected a safe harbor contribution at 4% of annual compensation. All of our safe harbor contributions are immediately vested.

Until January 1, 2017, Bio-Reference Laboratories, Inc. maintained two additional 401(k) retirement plans. Both plans had the same contribution limits as the Company’s plan. The first plan had a $1,000 full-vested match and covered the majority of Bio-Reference employees. The second plan covered the employees at GeneDx and was a safe harbor plan with an employer match of up to 5%. The employer contributions were vested over 6 years. Effective January 1, 2017, all OPKO and Bio-Reference employees are covered under the OPKO 401(k) Plan described above.

Other Compensation. All of our Named Executive Officers have standard benefits that are offered to all full-time, exempt employees. These standard benefits include health, dental and life insurance, and short and long term disability. We intend to continue to maintain the current benefits and perquisites for our Named Executive Officers; however, our Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may in the future revise, amend, or add to the benefits and perquisites of any Named Executive Officer if it deems it advisable.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code

Section 162(m) of the Code generally does not allow a deduction for annual compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid to our executive officers. This limitation on deductibility does not apply to certain compensation, including “performance based” compensation under a plan approved by our stockholders. Generally, we intend for equity grants under our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan to qualify for the “performance-based” exceptions from the Section 162(m) limitations. Our policy is generally to preserve the federal income tax deductibility of compensation and to qualify eligible compensation for the performance-based exception in order for compensation not to be subject to the limitation on deductibility imposed by Section 162(m) of the Code whenever practical to do so. We may, however, approve compensation that may not be deductible, including if we determine that the compensation is in our best interests as well as the best interests of our stockholders.

22

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee of our Board has submitted the following report for inclusion in this proxy statement.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement with management. Based on its review and discussions with management with respect to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement on Schedule 14A for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Compensation Committee report above shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.

23

Summary Compensation Table for 2014-2016

The following table sets forth information regarding compensation earned in or with respect to fiscal years 2016, 2015, and 2014 by:

We refer to these officers collectively as our Named Executive Officers.

24

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table presents information concerning grants of plan-based awards to each of the Named Executive Officers during the year ended December 31, 2016. The exercise price per share of each option granted to our Named Executive Officers during 2016 was equal to the fair market value of our common stock, as determined by our Compensation Committee on the date of the grant.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End for 2016

The following table sets forth information with respect to equity awards outstanding as of December 31, 2016.

25

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table summarizes for each Named Executive Officer the number of shares the Named Executive Officer acquired on the exercise of stock options and the number of shares the Named Executive Officer acquired on the vesting of stock awards in fiscal 2016.

26

Fiscal Year-End Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table sets forth aggregated information concerning our equity compensation plans outstanding at December 31, 2016.

Pension Benefits

None of our Named Executive Officers is covered by a pension plan or other similar benefit plan that provides for payments or other benefits at, following, or in connection with retirement.

Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

None of our Named Executive Officers is covered by a nonqualified defined contribution or other nonqualified deferred compensation plan.

Employment Agreements and Change in Control Arrangements

We have not entered into employment agreements with any of our executive officers. Except for Mr. Logal who is entitled to receive four months of paid salary and continued benefits if he is terminated without cause or he resigns for good reason, none of our Named Executive Officers are entitled to severance or change of control benefits; provided, however, that both the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan provide for accelerated vesting of all awards under the plan upon a Change in Control, as defined below. Pursuant to both the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan, if there is a Change in Control of the Company, the vesting date of each outstanding equity award under the plan shall be accelerated so that each such award shall, immediately prior to the effective date of the Change in Control, become fully vested with respect to the total number of shares of common stock subject to such award. Upon the consummation of any Change in Control, all outstanding awards under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan, shall to the extent not previously exercised, either be assumed by any successor corporation or parent thereof or be replaced with a comparable award with respect to shares of common stock of such successor corporation or parent thereof. Under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan, a “Change in Control” means the occurrence of any of the following events:

(a) any Person, as such term is used for purposes of Section 13(d) or 14(d) of the Exchange Act, or any successor section thereto, (other than (i) the Company, (ii) any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company, (iii) any subsidiaries of the Company, (iv) any company owned, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company, or (v) the Frost Group or any of its affiliates) becomes, either alone or together with such Person’s affiliates and associates, the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 50% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then-outstanding securities;

(b) during any period of twenty-four months, individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board, and any new directors whose election by the Board or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof;

27

(c) the effective date or date of consummation of any transaction or series of transactions (other than a transaction to which only the Company and one or more of its subsidiaries are parties) under which the Company is merged or consolidated with any other company, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) 50% or more of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation; or

(d) the stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the Company or an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.

If we had experienced a Change in Control on December 31, 2016, the value of the acceleration of stock options held by each of Drs. Frost and Hsiao and Messrs. Rubin and Logal would be approximately $3.4 million, $3.1 million, $3.1 million, and $1.8 million, respectively.

Compensation Policies and Practices as Related to Risk Management

The Compensation Committee and management do not believe that the Company maintains compensation policies or practices that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. Our employees’ base salaries are fixed in amount and thus we do not believe that they encourage excessive risk-taking. A significant proportion of the compensation provided to our employees is in the form of long-term equity-based incentives that we believe are important to help further align our employees’ interests with those of our stockholders. We do not believe that these equity-based incentives encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking because their ultimate value is tied to our stock price.

PROPOSAL TWO:

NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (“SAY ON PAY”)

Background of the Proposal

The Dodd-Frank Act requires all public companies, beginning with their stockholder meetings on or after January 21, 2011, to hold a separate non-binding advisory stockholder vote to approve the compensation of executive officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the executive compensation tables and any related information in each such company’s proxy statement (commonly known as a “Say on Pay” proposal). Pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we are holding a separate non-binding advisory vote on Say on Pay at the Annual Meeting.

Say on Pay Proposal

As discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement, our executive compensation program is primarily structured to (i) attract, motivate, and retain talented executives with the skill sets and expertise we need to meet our scientific and business objectives; (ii) be competitive in the marketplace; (iii) tie annual and long-term cash and equity incentives to the achievement of specified performance objectives that will result in increased stockholder value; and (iv) be cost-effective. The three primary elements of compensation used to support the above goals are base salary, discretionary annual bonus and equity awards. Although we have not adopted any formal guidelines for allocating total compensation between equity compensation and cash compensation, we maintain compensation plans that tie a substantial portion of our executives’ overall compensation to the achievement of corporate goals and success of the Company. The Board believes that our compensation program for our executive officers is appropriately based upon our performance and the individual performance and level of responsibility of the executive officers. We urge you to read the “Executive Compensation” section of this proxy statement for details on the Company’s executive compensation programs.

28

The Say on Pay proposal is set forth in the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to OPKO Health, Inc.’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion is hereby APPROVED.”

Because your vote on this proposal is advisory, it will not be binding on the Board, the Compensation Committee or the Company. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE SAY ON PAY PROPOSAL.

PROPOSAL THREE:

NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF THE ADVISORY VOTE

ON SAY ON PAY IN FUTURE YEARS (“SAY ON FREQUENCY”)

Background of the Proposal

The Dodd-Frank Act also requires all public companies to hold a separate non-binding advisory stockholder vote with respect to the frequency of the vote on the Say on Pay proposal no less than every six years. Companies must give stockholders the choice of whether to cast an advisory vote on the Say on Pay proposal every year, every two years, or every three years (commonly known as “Say on Frequency”). Stockholders may also abstain from making a choice. We last sought an advisory vote on Say on Frequency in 2011. Pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we are holding a separate non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of Say on Pay in future years at the Annual Meeting.

Say on Frequency Proposal

Previously, the Company sought an advisory vote on executive compensation from its stockholders every three years. In response to recommendations from stockholder advisory groups and evolving good corporate governance practices, the Company now recommends that the advisory vote from stockholders on Say on Pay should be done on an annual basis. The Board believes that an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers should be conducted every year so that stockholders may annually express their views on the Company’s executive compensation program. The Board believes that holding this advisory vote annually will provide the Company with timely and appropriate feedback on compensation decisions for its named executive officers. While this vote is not binding on the Company, our Board or our Compensation Committee, we believe that it is important for our stockholders to have an opportunity to vote on this proposal as a means to express their views on an annual basis regarding our executive compensation philosophy, our compensation policies and programs, and our decisions regarding executive compensation, all as disclosed in our proxy statement.

Although the Board recommends that the Say on Pay proposal be voted on every year, our stockholders will be able to specify one of four choices for the frequency of the vote on the Say on Pay proposal as follows: (i) one year, (ii) two years, (iii) three years, or (iv) abstain. This is an advisory vote and will not be binding on the Board, the Compensation Committee, or the Company, and the Board may determine that it is in the best interests of our stockholders and the Company to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than may be indicated by this advisory vote of our stockholders. Nevertheless, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome this advisory vote when considering how frequently to seek an advisory vote on Say on Pay in future years.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE SELECTION OF “ONE YEAR” AS THE FREQUENCY WITH WHICH STOCKHOLDERS ARE PROVIDED AN ADVISORY VOTE ON SAY ON PAY.

29

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”) has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since 2007. The Audit Committee currently plans to engage Ernst & Young as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements for fiscal 2017 and to express an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. We expect that a representative of Ernst & Young will attend the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The following table presents fees for professional audit services provided by Ernst & Young for the audits of our annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting for fiscal 2016 and 2015:

Audit Fees include fees for services rendered for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, the audit of internal control over financial reporting, the review of financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, statutory audits required domestically and internationally, assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC and consents and other services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit-Related Fees would principally include fees incurred for due diligence in connection with potential transactions and accounting consultations. There were no audit-related fees incurred in 2016 or 2015.

Tax Fees would include fees for services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. There were no tax fees incurred with Ernst & Young in 2016 and 2015.

All Other Fees would include fees for all other services rendered to us that do not constitute Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, or Tax Fees. There were no other fees incurred with Ernst & Young in 2016 and 2015.

Audit Committee Policy for Pre-approval of Independent Auditor Services

The Audit Committee of the Board is required to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditor’s independence. The Audit Committee has established a policy regarding pre-approval of permissible audit, audit-related, and other services provided by the independent auditors, which services are periodically reviewed and revised by the Audit Committee. Unless a type of service has received general pre-approval under the policy, the service will require specific approval by the Audit Committee. The policy also includes pre-approved fee levels for specified services and any proposed service exceeding the established fee level must be specifically approved by the Audit Committee. All audit and permitted non-audit services and all fees associated with such services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm in fiscal 2016 and 2015 were approved by the Audit Committee consistent with the policy described above.

30

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The following Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or incorporated by reference in any other filing by us under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The members of the Audit Committee of the Board are Messrs. Pfenniger, and Paganelli and Dr. Krasno. The primary purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in its general oversight of the Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes. The Audit Committee’s functions are more fully described in its charter adopted by the Board, which is available on the Company’s website at www.opko.com. The Audit Committee reviews and reassesses the adequacy of its charter on an annual basis. The Board annually reviews the NASDAQ listing standards’ definition of independence for Audit Committee members and has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent under that standard.

Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation, and integrity of the Company’s financial statements, accounting and financial reporting principles, and internal controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards, applicable laws, and regulations.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, is responsible for performing an independent annual audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on both the conformity of those financial statements with United States generally accepted accounting principles and on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee’s policy is that all services rendered by the Company’s independent auditor are either specifically approved or pre-approved and are monitored both as to spending level and work content to maintain the appropriate objectivity and independence of the independent auditor. The Audit Committee’s policy provides that the Audit Committee has the ultimate authority to approve all audit engagement fees and terms and that the Audit Committee shall review, evaluate, and approve the engagement proposal of the independent auditor.

In conjunction with its activities during fiscal year 2016, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed our interim results, audited financial statements, and the annual integrated audit of our financial statements and internal control over financial reporting with management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm with and without management present. The members of the Audit Committee discussed the quarterly review procedures and annual audit procedures performed by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with the quarterly unaudited and annual audited financial statements and discussed and agreed upon procedures related to the audit of internal control over financial reporting with management of the Company and its independent registered public accounting firm. The members of the Audit Committee also discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended. In addition, the Audit Committee received from the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the written disclosures and the letter required by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence. Based on the foregoing reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the fiscal 2016 annual audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2016.

31

OTHER INFORMATION

Deadlines for Stockholder Proposals and Nominations for the 2018 Annual Meeting

Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, our stockholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy and for consideration at the next annual meeting by submitting their proposals to us in a timely manner. Any stockholder of the Company who wishes to present a proposal for inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy for action at the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders (the “2018 Annual Meeting”) must comply with our Amended and Restated Bylaws and the rules and regulations of the SEC, each as then in effect. Such proposals must be mailed to us at our offices at 4400 Biscayne Blvd., Miami, Florida 33137, Attention: Secretary. Under the rules of the SEC, any stockholder proposal intended to be presented at the 2018 Annual Meeting must be received no later than December 29, 2017 in order to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy relating to such meeting. Under our Amended and Restated Bylaws, a stockholder must follow certain procedures to nominate persons for election as directors or to introduce an item of business at an annual meeting of stockholders. In order to be timely, we must receive notice of your intention to introduce a nomination or propose an item of business at our 2018 Annual Meeting between March 17, 2018 and April 16, 2018.

If a stockholder notifies us of an intent to present a proposal at the 2018 Annual Meeting at any time after April 16, 2018 (and for any reason the proposal is voted on at that meeting), it will be considered untimely and our proxy holders will have the right to exercise discretionary voting authority with respect to the proposal, if presented at the meeting, without including information regarding the proposal in our proxy materials.

Expenses of Solicitation

We will bear the cost of this proxy solicitation. In addition to the use of the mails, some of our regular employees, without additional remuneration, may solicit proxies personally or by telephone or facsimile. We will reimburse brokers, dealers, banks, and other custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses in forwarding solicitation materials to beneficial owners of our common stock.

Other Business

As of the date of this proxy statement, the Board knows of no business to be presented at the Annual Meeting other than as set forth in this proxy statement. If other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, or any of its adjournments, the persons named as proxies will vote on such matters in their discretion.

Householding

The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (e.g., brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”), addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies.

This year, a number of brokers with account holders who are stockholders of our company will be “householding” our proxy materials and Notice. A single proxy statement or Notice may be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once a stockholder has received notification from its broker that it will be “householding” communications to such stockholder’s address, “householding” will continue until such stockholder is notified otherwise or until such stockholder notifies its broker or us that it no longer wishes to participate in “householding.” If, at any time, a stockholder no longer wishes to participate in “householding” and would prefer to receive a separate copy of the 2017 proxy statement and 2016 annual report, or of the Notice, and/or wishes to receive separate copies of these documents in the future, or if, at any time, stockholders who share an address and receive separate copies of the 2017 proxy statement and 2016 annual report, who would like to receive a single copy of these documents, or of the Notice, in the future, such stockholder or stockholders may (1) notify its broker or (2) direct its written or oral request to: OPKO Health, Inc., Corporate Secretary, 4400 Biscayne Blvd., Miami, Florida 33137, (305) 575-4100.

32

Upon written or oral request of a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the 2017 proxy statement and 2016 annual report or Notice was delivered, we will deliver promptly separate copies of these documents.

33

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF

OPKO HEALTH, INC.

JUNE 15, 2017