10-Q: Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
Published on August 9, 2010
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010.
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ________ to ________.
Commission file number 001-33528
OPKO Health, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware | 75-2402409 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
4400 Biscayne Blvd.
Miami, FL 33137
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
Miami, FL 33137
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(305) 575-4100
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ YES o NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company (in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act):
YES o NO þ
As of
August 5, 2010, the registrant had 255,312,668 shares of common stock outstanding.
Table of Contents
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, as that term is
defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, or PSLRA, Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. Forward-looking statements include statements about our expectations, beliefs or
intentions regarding our product development efforts, business, financial condition, results of
operations, strategies or prospects. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that
these statements do not relate strictly to historical or current matters. Rather, forward-looking
statements relate to anticipated or expected events, activities, trends or results as of the date
they are made. Because forward-looking statements relate to matters that have not yet occurred,
these statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual
results to differ materially from any future results expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements. Many factors could cause our actual activities or results to differ materially from
the activities and results anticipated in forward-looking statements. These factors include those
described below and in Item 1A-Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009, and described from time to time in our reports filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Except as required by law, we do not undertake any obligation to update
forward-looking statements. We intend that all forward-looking statements be subject to the
safe-harbor provisions of the PSLRA. These forward-looking statements are only predictions and
reflect our views as of the date they are made with respect to future events and financial
performance.
Risks and uncertainties, the occurrence of which could adversely affect our business, include
the following:
| We have a history of operating losses and we do not expect to become profitable in the near future. | ||
| Our technologies are in an early stage of development and are unproven. | ||
| Our drug research and development activities may not result in commercially viable products. | ||
| The results of previous clinical trials may not be predictive of future results, and our current and planned clinical trials may not satisfy the requirements of the FDA or other non-U.S. regulatory authorities. | ||
| We will require substantial additional funding, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. | ||
| We expect to finance future cash needs primarily through public or private offerings, debt financings or strategic collaborations, which may dilute your stockholdings in the Company. | ||
| If our competitors develop and market products that are more effective, safer or less expensive than our future product candidates, our commercial opportunities will be negatively impacted. | ||
| The regulatory approval process is expensive, time consuming and uncertain and may prevent us or our collaboration partners from obtaining approvals for the commercialization of some or all of our product candidates. | ||
| Failure to recruit and enroll patients for clinical trials may cause the development of our product candidates to be delayed. | ||
| Even if we obtain regulatory approvals for our product candidates, the terms of approvals and ongoing regulation of our products may limit how we manufacture and market our product candidates, which could materially impair our ability to generate anticipated revenues. | ||
| We may not meet regulatory quality standards applicable to our manufacturing and quality processes. | ||
| Even if we receive regulatory approval to market our product candidates, the market may not be receptive to our products. | ||
| If we fail to attract and retain key management and scientific personnel, we may be unable to successfully develop or commercialize our product candidates. |
3
Table of Contents
| In the event that we successfully evolve from a company primarily involved in development to a company also involved in commercialization, we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth and expanding our operations successfully. | ||
| If we fail to acquire and develop other products or product candidates, at all or on commercially reasonable terms, we may be unable to diversify or grow our business. | ||
| We have no experience manufacturing our pharmaceutical product candidates other than at our Mexican facility and we therefore rely on third parties to manufacture and supply our pharmaceutical product candidates, and would need to meet various standards necessary to satisfy FDA regulations if and when we commence manufacturing. | ||
| We currently have no pharmaceutical marketing, sales or distribution organization other than in Chile and Mexico. If we are unable to develop our sales and marketing and distribution capability on our own or through collaborations with marketing partners, we will not be successful in commercializing our pharmaceutical product candidates. | ||
| Independent clinical investigators and contract research organizations that we engage to conduct our clinical trials may not be diligent, careful or timely. | ||
| The success of our business is dependent on the actions of our collaborative partners. | ||
| If we are unable to obtain and enforce patent protection for our products, our business could be materially harmed. | ||
| If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our proprietary information and know-how, the value of our technology and products could be adversely affected. | ||
| We will rely heavily on licenses from third parties. | ||
| We license patent rights to certain of our technology from third-party owners. If such owners do not properly maintain or enforce the patents underlying such licenses, our competitive position and business prospects will be harmed. | ||
| Our commercial success depends significantly on our ability to operate without infringing the patents and other proprietary rights of third parties. | ||
| Adverse results in material litigation matters or governmental inquiries could have a material adverse effect upon our business and financial condition. | ||
| Medicare prescription drug coverage legislation and future legislative or regulatory reform of the health care system may affect our ability to sell our products profitably. | ||
| Failure to obtain regulatory approval outside the United States will prevent us from marketing our product candidates abroad. | ||
| We may not have the funding available to pursue acquisitions. | ||
| Acquisitions may disrupt our business, distract our management and may not proceed as planned; and we may encounter difficulties in integrating acquired businesses. | ||
| Non-U.S. governments often impose strict price controls, which may adversely affect our future profitability. | ||
| Our business may become subject to legal, economic, political, regulatory and other risks associated with international operations. | ||
| The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly. |
4
Table of Contents
| Directors, executive officers, principal stockholders and affiliated entities own a significant percentage of our capital stock, and they may make decisions that you do not consider to be in your best interests or in the best interests of our stockholders. | ||
| Compliance with changing regulations concerning corporate governance and public disclosure may result in additional expenses. | ||
| If we are unable to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as they apply to us, or our internal controls over financial reporting are not effective, the reliability of our financial statements may be questioned and our common stock price may suffer. | ||
| We may be unable to maintain our listing on the NYSE Amex, which could cause our stock price to fall and decrease the liquidity of our common stock. | ||
| Future issuances of common stock and hedging activities may depress the trading price of our common stock. | ||
| Provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law could discourage an acquisition of us by a third party, even if the acquisition would be favorable to you. | ||
| We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. |
5
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to
the Company, OPKO, we, our, ours, and us refer to OPKO Health, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, including our wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Item 1. Financial Statements
OPKO Health, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
(in thousands except share data)
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 9,686 | $ | 42,658 | ||||
Marketable securities |
9,998 | | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
11,916 | 8,767 | ||||||
Inventory, net |
11,819 | 10,520 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
2,071 | 1,873 | ||||||
Total current assets |
45,490 | 63,818 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
2,509 | 593 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
10,631 | 12,722 | ||||||
Goodwill |
4,981 | 5,408 | ||||||
Investments |
3,972 | 4,447 | ||||||
Other assets |
432 | 442 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 68,015 | $ | 87,430 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 5,949 | $ | 4,784 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
4,823 | 3,918 | ||||||
Current portion of lines of credit |
6,110 | 4,321 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
16,882 | 13,023 | ||||||
Long-term interest payable to related party |
| 3,409 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
1,080 | 1,339 | ||||||
Line of credit with related party, net of unamortized discount of $0 and $68, respectively |
| 11,932 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
17,962 | 29,703 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Shareholders equity |
||||||||
Series A Preferred stock $0.01 par value, 4,000,000 shares authorized;
987,484 and 1,025,934 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation value of
$2,592 and $2,564) at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively |
10 | 10 | ||||||
Series C Preferred Stock $0.01 par value, 500,000 shares authorized;
No shares issued or outstanding |
| | ||||||
Series D Preferred stock $0.01 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized;
1,209,677 and 1,209,677 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation value of
$31,813 and $30,613) at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
12 | 12 | ||||||
Common Stock $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized;
255,279,878 and 253,762,552 shares issued and outstanding at
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
2,553 | 2,538 | ||||||
Treasury stock - 45,154 shares at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
(61 | ) | (61 | ) | ||||
Additional paid-in capital |
397,898 | 393,144 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
(108 | ) | 1,313 | |||||
Accumulated deficit |
(350,251 | ) | (339,229 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders equity |
50,053 | 57,727 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 68,015 | $ | 87,430 | ||||
The
accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
6
Table of Contents
OPKO Health, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except share data)
For the three months ended June 30, | For the six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 7,455 | $ | 2,347 | $ | 15,377 | $ | 4,648 | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
4,850 | 1,764 | 10,378 | 3,325 | ||||||||||||
Gross margin |
2,605 | 583 | 4,999 | 1,323 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
5,644 | 2,926 | 9,887 | 6,183 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
1,575 | 2,498 | 2,903 | 8,157 | ||||||||||||
Other operating expenses, principally
amortization of intangible assets |
913 | 406 | 1,802 | 812 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
8,132 | 5,830 | 14,592 | 15,152 | ||||||||||||
Operating loss |
(5,527 | ) | (5,247 | ) | (9,593 | ) | (13,829 | ) | ||||||||
Other expense, net |
(390 | ) | (494 | ) | (730 | ) | (944 | ) | ||||||||
Loss before income taxes and investment
loss |
(5,917 | ) | (5,741 | ) | (10,323 | ) | (14,773 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
54 | (103 | ) | 101 | (138 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss before investment loss in investee |
(5,971 | ) | (5,638 | ) | (10,424 | ) | (14,635 | ) | ||||||||
Loss from investment in investee |
(244 | ) | (38 | ) | (475 | ) | (38 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss |
(6,215 | ) | (5,676 | ) | (10,899 | ) | (14,673 | ) | ||||||||
Preferred stock dividend |
(661 | ) | (58 | ) | (1,323 | ) | (116 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss attributable to common
shareholders |
$ | (6,876 | ) | $ | (5,734 | ) | $ | (12,222 | ) | $ | (14,789 | ) | ||||
Loss per common share, basic and diluted |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | ||||
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding, basic and diluted |
255,252,433 | 225,648,244 | 254,854,652 | 212,695,483 |
The
accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
7
Table of Contents
OPKO Health, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
(in thousands)
For the six months ended June 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (10,899 | ) | $ | (14,673 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,964 | 935 | ||||||
Accretion of debt discount related to notes payable |
136 | 32 | ||||||
Share based compensation |
2,742 | 1,767 | ||||||
Provision for (recovery of) bad debts |
119 | (133 | ) | |||||
(Reveral of) provision for inventory obsolescence |
(3 | ) | 52 | |||||
Loss from investment in investee |
475 | 38 | ||||||
Changes in: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(2,610 | ) | (1,027 | ) | ||||
Inventory |
(1,170 | ) | (1,140 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(516 | ) | 45 | |||||
Other assets |
105 | (129 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable |
1,331 | (20 | ) | |||||
Accrued expenses |
(2,947 | ) | (762 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(11,273 | ) | (15,015 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||
Acquisition of business, net of cash |
(1,447 | ) | | |||||
Investment in investee |
| (2,300 | ) | |||||
Purchase of short-term marketable securities |
(14,997 | ) | (4,997 | ) | ||||
Maturities of short-term marketable securities |
5,000 | | ||||||
Capital expenditures |
(510 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(11,954 | ) | (7,321 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Issuance of common stock for cash, to related parties |
| 25,000 | ||||||
Issuance of common stock for cash |
| 25,990 | ||||||
Repayment of line of credit with related party |
(12,000 | ) | | |||||
Borrowings under lines of credit |
3,500 | | ||||||
Repayments under lines of credit |
(1,271 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from bridge loan with related party |
| 3,000 | ||||||
Repayment of bridge loan with related party |
| (3,000 | ) | |||||
Insurance financing |
| 217 | ||||||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants |
26 | 621 | ||||||
Repayments of notes payable and capital lease obligations |
| (231 | ) | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(9,745 | ) | 51,597 | |||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(32,972 | ) | 29,261 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
42,658 | 6,678 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 9,686 | $ | 35,939 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION |
||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 4,241 | $ | 50 | ||||
Income taxes refunded, net |
$ | 68 | $ | | ||||
NON-CASH
INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Issuance of capital stock to acquire Pharmacos Exakta |
$ | 2,000 | $ | |
The
accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
8
Table of Contents
OPKO Health, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
NOTE 1 BUSINESS AND ORGANIZATION
We are a specialty healthcare company involved in the discovery, development, and
commercialization of pharmaceutical products, medical devices, vaccines, diagnostic technologies,
and imaging systems. Initially focused on the treatment and management of ophthalmic diseases, we
have since expanded into other areas of major unmet medical need. We are a Delaware corporation,
headquartered in Miami, Florida.
NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of presentation. The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all information and footnotes required by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary
to present fairly the Companys results of operations, financial position and cash flows have been
made. The results of operations and cash flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,
are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations and cash flows that may be reported for
the remainder of 2010 or for future periods. The interim condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Principles of consolidation. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of OPKO Health, Inc. and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Use of estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Comprehensive loss. Our comprehensive loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010
includes net loss for the three and six months and the cumulative translation adjustment, net, for
the translation results of our subsidiaries in Chile and Mexico. Comprehensive loss for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 is comprised entirely of our net loss.
Revenue recognition. Generally, we recognize revenue from product sales when goods are
shipped and title and risk of loss transfer to our customers. Certain of our instrumentation
products are sold directly to end-users and require that we deliver, install and train the staff at
the end-users facility. As a result, we do not recognize revenue until the product is delivered,
installed and training has occurred.
Derivative financial instruments. We record derivative financial instruments on our balance
sheet at their fair value and the changes in the fair value are recognized in income when they
occur, the only exception being derivatives that qualify as hedges. To qualify the derivative
instrument as a hedge, we are required to meet strict hedge effectiveness and contemporaneous
documentation requirements at the initiation of the hedge and assess the hedge effectiveness on an
ongoing basis over the life of the hedge. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, our forward
contracts for inventory purchases did not meet the documentation requirements to be designated as
hedges. Accordingly, we recognize all changes in fair values in income. Refer to Note 7.
9
Table of Contents
Product warranties. Product warranty expense is recorded concurrently with the recording of
revenue for product sales. The costs of warranties are accounted for as a component of cost of
sales. We estimate warranty costs based on our estimated historical experience and adjust for any
known product reliability issues.
Allowance for doubtful accounts. We analyze accounts receivable and historical bad debt
levels, customer credit worthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the
allowance for doubtful accounts using the specific identification method. Our reported net loss is
directly affected by our estimate of the collectability of accounts receivable. Estimated
allowances for sales returns are based upon our history of product returns. The amount of
allowance for doubtful accounts at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, was $0.6 million and
$0.4 million, respectively.
Segment reporting. Our chief operating decision-maker (CODM) is comprised of our executive
management with the oversight of our board of directors. Our CODM review our operating results and
operating plans and make resource allocation decisions on a company-wide or aggregate basis. We
currently manage our operations in two reportable segments, pharmaceutical and instrumentation
segments. The pharmaceutical segment consists of two operating segments, our (i) pharmaceutical
research and development segment which is focused on the research and development of pharmaceutical
products, diagnostic tests and vaccines, and (ii) the pharmaceutical operations we acquired in
Chile and Mexico through the acquisition of Pharma Genexx S.A. (Pharma Genexx) and Pharmacos
Exakta S.A. de C.V. (Pharmacos Exakta). The instrumentation segment consists of ophthalmic
instrumentation products and the activities related to the research, development, manufacture and
commercialization of those products. There are no inter-segment sales. We evaluate the
performance of each segment based on operating profit or loss. There is no inter-segment
allocation of interest expense and income taxes.
Equity-based compensation. We measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for
an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost is
recognized in the statement of operations over the period during which an employee is required to
provide service in exchange for the award. We record excess tax benefits, realized from the
exercise of stock options as a financing cash inflow rather than as a reduction of taxes paid in
cash flow from operations. Equity-based compensation arrangements to non-employees are recorded at
their fair value on the measurement date. The measurement of equity-based compensation is subject
to periodic adjustment as the underlying equity instruments vest. During the three months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, we recorded $1.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of equity-based
compensation expense. For the six month period ending June 30, 2010 and 2009, we recorded $2.7
million, and $1.8 million, respectively, of equity-based compensation expense.
Recent accounting pronouncements. In March 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or
FASB, issued updated guidance to amend and clarify how entities should evaluate credit derivatives
embedded in beneficial interests in securitized financial assets. The updated guidance eliminates
the scope exception for bifurcation of embedded credit derivatives in interests in securitized
financial assets, unless they are created solely by subordination of one financial instrument to
another. The update allows entities to elect the fair value option for any beneficial interest in
securitized financial assets upon adoption. This guidance is effective by the first day of the
first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. We have not
adopted this guidance early and are currently evaluating the potential effect of the adoption of
this amendment on our results of operation and financial condition.
In March 2010, the FASB reached a consensus to issue an amendment to the accounting for
revenue arrangements under which a vendor satisfies its performance obligations to a customer over
a period of time, when the deliverable or unit of accounting is not within the scope of other
authoritative literature and when the arrangement consideration is contingent upon the achievement
of a milestone. The amendment defines a milestone and clarifies whether an entity may recognize
consideration earned from the achievement of a milestone in the period in which the milestone is
achieved. This amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with
early adoption permitted. The amendment may be applied retrospectively to all arrangements or
prospectively for milestones achieved after the effective date. We have not adopted this guidance
early and adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material impact on our results of
operation or financial condition.
In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting for fair value measurements
and disclosures. This amendment details additional disclosures on fair value measurements,
requires a gross presentation of activities within a Level 3 rollforward and adds a new requirement
to the disclosure of transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 measurements. The new disclosures
are required of all entities that are required to provide disclosures about recurring and
nonrecurring fair value measurements. This amendment was effective as of January 1, 2010, with an
10
Table of Contents
exception for the gross presentation of Level 3 rollforward information, which is required for
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim reporting periods
within those years. The adoption of the remaining provisions of this amendment is not expected to
have a material impact on our financial statement disclosures.
In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting for multiple-deliverable
revenue arrangements. This amendment provides guidance on determining whether multiple
deliverables exist, how the arrangements should be separated and how the consideration paid should
be allocated. As a result of this amendment, entities may be able to separate multiple-deliverable
arrangements in more circumstances than under existing accounting guidance. This guidance amends
the requirement to establish the fair value of undelivered products and services based on objective
evidence and instead provides for separate revenue recognition based upon managements best
estimate of the selling price for an undelivered item when there is no other means to determine the
fair value of that undelivered item. The existing guidance previously required that the fair value
of the undelivered item reflect the price of the item either sold in a separate transaction between
unrelated third parties or the price charged for each item when the item is sold separately by the
vendor. If the fair value of all of the elements in the arrangement was not determinable, then
revenue was deferred until all of the items were delivered or fair value was determined. This
amendment will be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially
modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption and retrospective
application is also permitted. We have not adopted this guidance early and are currently
evaluating the potential effect of the adoption of this amendment on our results of operations and
financial condition.
NOTE 3 LOSS PER SHARE
Basic loss per share is computed by dividing our net loss by the weighted average number of
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing our net
loss by the weighted average number of shares outstanding and the impact of all dilutive potential
common shares, primarily stock options. The dilutive impact of stock options and warrants are
determined by applying the treasury stock method.
A total of 20,164,446 and 15,692,101 potential common shares have been excluded from the
calculation of net loss per share for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. A total of 19,617,796 and 15,238,119 potential
common shares have been excluded from the calculation of net loss per share for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. As of
June 30, 2010, the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock and Series D Preferred Stock could
convert their Preferred Shares into approximately 1,036,858 and 12,827,952 shares of our Common
Stock, respectively.
11
Table of Contents
NOTE 4 COMPOSITION OF CERTAIN FINANCIAL STATEMENT CAPTIONS
(in thousands) | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
$ | 12,557 | $ | 9,118 | ||||
Less allowance for doubtful accounts |
(641 | ) | (351 | ) | ||||
$ | 11,916 | $ | 8,767 | |||||
Inventories, net: |
||||||||
Raw materials (components) |
$ | 3,897 | $ | 3,764 | ||||
Work-in process |
1,003 | 1,365 | ||||||
Finished products |
7,129 | 5,632 | ||||||
Less provision for inventory reserve |
(210 | ) | (241 | ) | ||||
$ | 11,819 | $ | 10,520 | |||||
Intangible assets, net: |
||||||||
Customer relationships |
$ | 6,993 | $ | 7,259 | ||||
Technology |
4,597 | 4,597 | ||||||
Product registrations |
3,612 | 3,829 | ||||||
Tradename |
617 | 578 | ||||||
Covenants not to compete |
363 | 317 | ||||||
Other |
7 | 7 | ||||||
Less amortization |
(5,558 | ) | (3,865 | ) | ||||
$ | 10,631 | $ | 12,722 | |||||
The change in value of the intangible assets reflects the foreign currency fluctuation between the
Chilean peso and the US dollar at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
NOTE 5 ACQUISITION AND INVESTMENTS
On February 17, 2010, we acquired Pharmacos Exakta, a privately-owned Mexican company, engaged
in the manufacture, marketing and distribution of ophthalmic and other pharmaceutical products for
government and private markets since 1957. Pursuant to a purchase agreement we acquired all of the
outstanding stock of Pharmacos Exakta and real property owned by an affiliate of Pharmacos Exakta
for a total aggregate purchase price of $3.6 million, of which an aggregate of $1.6 million was
paid in cash and $2.0 million was paid in shares of our Common Stock, par value $.01. The number
of shares to be issued was determined by the average closing price of the Companys Common Stock as
reported on the NYSE Amex for the ten trading days ending on February 12, 2010. A total of
1,372,428 shares of OPKO Common Stock were issued in the transaction which were valued at $2.0
million due to trading restrictions. A portion of the proceeds will remain in escrow for a period
of time for working capital adjustments and to satisfy indemnification claims.
On October 1, 2009, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Pharma Genexx, a
privately-owned Chilean company engaged in the representation, importation, commercialization and
distribution of pharmaceutical products, over-the-counter products and medical devices for
government, private and institutional markets in Chile. Pursuant to a stock purchase agreement
with Pharma Genexx and its shareholders, Farmacias Ahumada S.A., FASA Chile S.A., and Laboratorios
Volta S.A., we acquired all of the outstanding stock of Pharma Genexx in exchange for $16 million
in cash. The transaction closed on October 7, 2009.
Effective September 21, 2009, we entered into an agreement pursuant to which we invested $2.5
million in cash in Cocrystal Discovery, Inc., a privately held biopharmaceutical company
(Cocrystal) in exchange for 1,701,723 shares of Cocrystals Convertible Series A Preferred Stock.
As of June 30, 2010, we own approximately 16% of Cocrystals outstanding stock.
We have determined that Cocrystal has insufficient resources to carry out its principal
activities without additional subordinated financial support. As such, Cocrystal meets the
definition of a variable interest entity (VIE). In order to determine the primary beneficiary of
the variable interest entity (VIE), we evaluated the related party group to identify who had the
most significant power to control Cocrystal. Members of The Frost Group, LLC (the Frost Group)
own approximately 4,422,967 shares, representing 42% of Cocrystals voting stock on an as converted basis,
including 4,152,386 held by the Frost Gamma Investments Trust (the Gamma Trust).
12
Table of Contents
The Frost Group members include a trust controlled by Dr. Frost, who is our Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, Dr. Jane H. Hsiao, who is the Vice
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Technical Officer, Steven D. Rubin who is Executive
Vice President Administration and a director of the Company and Rao Uppaluri who is our Chief
Financial Officer. Dr. Frost, Mr. Rubin, and Dr. Hsiao currently serve on the Board of Directors
of Cocrystal and represent 50% of its board. In addition, the Gamma Trust influenced the redesign
of Cocrystal and can significantly influence the success of Cocrystal through its board
representation and voting power. As such, we have determined that the Gamma Trust is the primary
beneficiary within the related party group. As a result of our determination that we are not the
primary beneficiary, we have accounted for our investment in Cocrystal under the equity method.
On June 10, 2009, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.
(Sorrento), a privately held company with a technology for generating fully human monoclonal
antibodies, pursuant to which we invested $2.3 million in Sorrento. We own approximately
53,113,732 shares of Sorrento common stock, or approximately 24% of Sorrentos total outstanding
common stock at June 30, 2010. The closing stock price for Sorrentos common stock, a thinly
traded stock, as quoted on the over-the-counter markets was $1.75 per share on June 30, 2010.
NOTE 6 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
We record fair value at an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As
such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that
market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. We utilize a three-tier fair value
hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level
1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs
other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and
Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore
requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
As of June 30, 2010, we held money market funds that qualify as cash equivalents and forward
contracts for inventory purchases that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring
basis. Refer to Note 7. As of June 30, 2010, we held money market funds that qualify as cash
equivalents as well as marketable securities which were comprised of treasury securities, maturing
August 12, 2010, that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The $10
million of treasury securities are recorded at amortized cost, which reflects their approximate
fair value. Our other assets and liabilities carrying value approximate their fair value due to
their short-term nature.
Upon the termination of an employee of Ophthalmics Technologies, Inc., or OTI, we became
obligated at the former employees sole option to acquire up to 10% of the shares issued to the
employee in connection with the acquisition of OTI at a price of $3.55 per share. In February
2009, this employee exercised his put option and we repurchased 27,154 shares of our Common Stock
at $3.55 per share for a total of $0.1 million. In addition, an existing employee of OTI has the
same provision within his employment arrangement with a potential obligation of approximately
$0.3 million. We have recorded approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million in accrued expenses as
of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, based on the estimated fair value of the
unexercised put option.
The OTI put options were valued at fair value utilizing the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation
method. During the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we recorded a reversal of expense of
$24 thousand and $0.1 million, respectively, reflecting our stock price fluctuations. During the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we recorded a reversal of expense of $40 thousand and $0.1
million, respectively, reflecting our stock price fluctuations.
Any future fluctuation in fair value related to these instruments that is judged to be
temporary, including any recoveries of previous write-downs, would be recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income or loss. If we determine that any future valuation adjustment was
other-than-temporary, we would record a charge to the consolidated statement of operations as
appropriate.
13
Table of Contents
Our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as
follows:
Fair value measurements as of June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted prices in | ||||||||||||||||
active markets for | Significant other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
identical assets | observable inputs | unobservable inputs | ||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Total | ||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Money market funds |
$ | 8,360 | $ | | $ | | $ | 8,360 | ||||||||
Treasury securities |
9,998 | | | 9,998 | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 18,358 | $ | | $ | | $ | 18,358 | ||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
OTI put option |
$ | | $ | 137 | $ | | $ | 137 | ||||||||
Forward contracts |
| 450 | | 450 | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | | $ | 587 | $ | | $ | 587 | ||||||||
NOTE 7 DERIVATIVE CONTRACTS
We enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to cover the risk of exposure to
exchange rate differences arising from inventory purchases on letters of credit. Under these
forward contracts, for any rate above or below the fixed rate, we receive or pay the difference
between the spot rate and the fixed rate for the given amount at the settlement date.
We record derivative financial instruments on our balance sheet at their fair value as an
accrued expense and the changes in the fair value are recognized in income in other expense net
when they occur, the only exception being derivatives that qualify as hedges. To qualify the
derivative instrument as a hedge, we are required to meet strict hedge effectiveness and
contemporaneous documentation requirements at the initiation of the hedge and assess the hedge
effectiveness on an ongoing basis over the life of the hedge. At June 30, 2010, the forward
contracts did not meet the documentation requirements to be designated as hedges. Accordingly, we
recognize all changes in fair values in income.
The outstanding contracts at June 30, 2010, have been recorded at fair value, and their
maturity details are as follows:
(in thousands) | Fair value at | Unrealized gain | ||||||||||
Days until maturity | Contract value | June 30, 2010 | (loss) | |||||||||
0 to 30 |
$ | 342 | $ | 315 | $ | (27 | ) | |||||
31 to 60 |
1,268 | 1,205 | (63 | ) | ||||||||
61 to 90 |
451 | 418 | (33 | ) | ||||||||
91 to 120 |
1,793 | 1,695 | (98 | ) | ||||||||
121 to 180 |
1,829 | 1,713 | (116 | ) | ||||||||
More than 180 |
2,197 | 2,084 | (113 | ) | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 7,880 | $ | 7,430 | $ | (450 | ) | |||||
NOTE 8 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
On July 20, 2010, we entered into a use agreement for approximately 1,100 square feet of space
in Jupiter, Florida to house our molecular diagnostics operations from The Scripps Research
Institute (Scripps). Dr. Frost is a member of the Board of Trustees of Scripps and Dr. Richard
Lerner, a member of our board of directors, is also the President of Scripps. Pursuant to the
terms of the use agreement, which is effective as of November 1, 2009, gross rent is approximately
$40 thousand per year for a two-year term which may be extended, upon mutual agreement, for one
additional year.
On June 1, 2010, the Company entered into a cooperative research and development agreement
with Academia Sinica in Taipei, Taiwan, for pre-clinical work for a compound against various forms
of cancer. Dr. Alice Yu, a member of our board of directors, is a Distinguished Research Fellow
and Associate Director at the Genomics
14
Table of Contents
Research Center, Academia Sinica. In connection with the agreement, we are required to pay
Academia Sinica approximately $0.2 million over the term of the agreement.
Effective March 5, 2010, the Frost Group assigned two license agreements with Academia Sinica
to the Companys subsidiary, OPKO Taiwan, Inc. The license agreements pertain to alpha-galactosyl
ceramide analogs and their use as immunotherapies and peptide ligands in the diagnosis and
treatment of cancer. In connection with the assignment of the two licenses, the Company agreed to
reimburse the Frost Group for the licensing fees previously paid by the Frost Group to Academia
Sinica in the amounts of $50 thousand and $75 thousand, respectively, as well as reimbursement of
certain expenses.
Effective September 21, 2009, we entered into an agreement pursuant to which the we invested
$2.5 million in Cocrystal in exchange for 1,701,723 shares of Cocrystals Convertible Series A
Preferred Stock. A group of Investors, led by the Frost Group (the Cocrystal Investors),
previously invested $5 million in Cocrystal, and agreed to invest an additional $5 million payable
in two equal installments in September 2009 and March 2010. As a result of an amendment to the
Cocrystal Investors agreements dated June 9, 2009, OPKO, rather than the Cocrystal Investors, made
the first installment investment ($2.5 million) on September 21, 2009. Refer to Note 5.
On July 20, 2009, the Company entered into a worldwide exclusive license agreement with
Academia Sinica in Taipei, Taiwan, for a new technology to develop protein vaccines against
influenza and other viral infections. Dr. Alice Yu, a member of
our Board of Directors, is a Distinguished Research Fellow and Associate Director at the Genomics Research Center, Academia
Sinica.
On June 16, 2009, we entered into an agreement to lease approximately 10,000 square feet of
space in Hialeah, Florida to house manufacturing and service operations for our ophthalmic
instrumentation business (the Hialeah Facility) from an entity controlled by Dr. Frost and Dr.
Jane Hsiao. Pursuant to the terms of a lease agreement, which is effective as of February 1, 2009,
gross rent is $0.1 million per year for a one-year lease which may be extended, at our option, for
one additional year. From April 2008 through January 2009, we leased 20,000 square feet at the
Hialeah Facility from a third party landlord pursuant to a lease agreement which contained an
option to purchase the facility. We initially elected to exercise the option to purchase the
Hialeah Facility in September 2008. Prior to closing, however, we assigned the right to purchase
the Hialeah Facility to an entity controlled by Drs. Frost and Hsiao and leased a smaller portion
of the facility as a result of several factors, including our inability to obtain outside financing
for the purchase, current business needs, the reduced operating costs for the smaller space and the
minimization of risk and expense of unutilized space.
In March 2009, we paid the $45 thousand filing fee to the Federal Trade Commission in
connection with filings made by us and Dr. Frost, under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust
Improvements Act of 1976 (HSR). The filings permitted Dr. Frost and his affiliates to acquire
additional shares of our Common Stock upon expiration of the HSR waiting period on March 23, 2009.
In November 2007, we entered into an office lease with Frost Real Estate Holdings, LLC, an
entity affiliated with Dr. Frost. The lease is for approximately 8,300 square feet of space in an
office building in Miami, Florida, where the Companys principal executive offices are located. We
had previously been leasing this space from Frost Real Estate Holdings on a month-to-month basis
while the parties were negotiating the lease. The lease provides for payments of approximately $18
thousand per month in the first year increasing annually to $24 thousand per month in the fifth
year, plus applicable sales tax. The rent is inclusive of operating expenses, property taxes and
parking. The rent for the first year was reduced to reflect a $30 thousand credit for the costs of
tenant improvements. From January 1, 2008 through October 1, 2008, we leased an additional 1,100
square feet of general office and laboratory space on a ground floor annex of our corporate office
building pursuant to an addendum to the Lease, which required us to pay annual rent of $19 thousand
per year for the annex space.
On September 19, 2007, we entered into an exclusive technology license agreement with Winston
Laboratories, Inc. (Winston) pursuant to which we acquired an exclusive license to the
proprietary rights of certain products in exchange for the payment of an initial licensing fee,
royalties, and payments on the occurrence of certain milestones.
On February 23, 2010, we provided Winston notice of termination of the license agreement, and
the agreement terminated on May 24, 2010. Previously, members of the Frost Group, LLC, or the
Frost Group, beneficially owned approximately 30% of Winston Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Dr.
Uppaluri, our Chief Financial Officer, served as a member of Winstons board. Effective May 19,
2010, the members of the Frost Group sold 100% of Winstons capital stock beneficially owned by
them (consisting of an aggregate of 18,399,271 outstanding shares of common stock and warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 8,958,975 shares of common stock) to an entity whose members include Dr.
Joel E. Bernstein, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Winston. As consideration for the
sale, the Frost Group members received an aggregate of $789,500 in cash and non-recourse promissory
notes in the aggregate principal amount of $10,263,500 (the Promissory Notes). Dr. Uppaluri
resigned from the Winston board effective May 19, 2010.
We have a $12.0 million line of credit with the Frost Group, a related party. On June 2, 2010
we repaid all amounts outstanding on the line of credit including $12 million in principal and $4.1
million in interest. We have the ability to redraw funds under the line of credit until its
expiration in January 2011. We are obligated to pay interest upon maturity, capitalized quarterly,
on outstanding borrowings under the line of credit at an 11% annual rate, which is due January 11,
2011. The line of credit is collateralized by all of our personal property except our intellectual
property.
We reimburse Dr. Frost for Company-related use by Dr. Frost and our other executives of an
airplane owned by a company that is beneficially owned by Dr. Frost. We reimburse Dr. Frost in an
amount equal to the cost of a first class airline ticket between the travel cities for each
executive, including Dr. Frost, traveling on the airplane for
15
Table of Contents
Company-related business. We do not reimburse Dr. Frost for personal use of the airplane by
Dr. Frost or any other executive; nor do we pay for any other fixed or variable operating costs of
the airplane. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we reimbursed Dr. Frost
approximately $7 thousand and $25 thousand, respectively, for Company-related travel by Dr. Frost
and other OPKO executives. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, we reimbursed Dr.
Frost approximately $13 thousand and $46 thousand, respectively, for Company-related travel by Dr.
Frost and other OPKO executives.
NOTE 9 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
On January 7, 2010, we received a letter from counsel to Nidek Co., Ltd. (Nidek) alleging
that Ophthalmic Technologies, Inc. (OTI) or OPKO breached its service obligations to Nidek under
the Service Agreement between OTI, Nidek and Newport Corporation, dated December 29, 2006, and the
Service Agreement by and between Nidek and OTI, dated the same date. We have had discussions with
Nidek regarding the matter, but it is too early to assess the likelihood of litigation in this
matter or the probability of a favorable or unfavorable outcome. We do not believe this matter
will have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition. We are also
assessing possible claims of indemnification against a supplier in connection with the matter.
On May 6, 2008, we completed the acquisition of Vidus Ocular, Inc., or Vidus. Pursuant to a
Securities Purchase Agreement with Vidus, each of its stockholders, and the holders of convertible
promissory notes issued by Vidus, we acquired all of the outstanding stock and convertible debt of
Vidus in exchange for (i) the issuance and delivery at closing of 658,080 shares of our common
stock (the Closing Shares); (ii) the issuance of 488,420 shares of our common stock to be held in
escrow pending the occurrence of certain development milestones (the Milestone Shares); and (iii)
the issuance of options to acquire 200,000 shares of our common stock. Additionally, in the event
that the stock price for our common stock at the time of receipt of approval or clearance by the
U.S. Food & Drug Administration of a pre-market notification 510(k) relating to the Aquashunt is
not at or above a specified price, we will be obligated to issue an additional 413,850 shares of
our common stock.
We have a potential obligation of approximately $0.3 million related to a put option held by
an employee. Refer to Note 6.
We expect to incur losses from operations for the foreseeable future. We expect to incur
substantial research and development expenses, including expenses related to the hiring of
personnel and additional clinical trials. We expect that selling, general and administrative
expenses will also increase as we expand our sales, marketing and administrative staff and add
infrastructure. We intend to finance additional research and development projects, clinical trials
and our future operations with a combination of private placements, payments from potential
strategic research and development, licensing and/or marketing arrangements, public offerings, debt
financing and revenues from future product sales, if any. There can be no assurance, however, that
additional capital will be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all.
We are a party to other litigation in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that
any such other litigation will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
or results of operations.
NOTE 10 SEGMENTS
We currently manage our operations in two reportable segments, pharmaceutical and
instrumentation segments. The pharmaceutical segment consists of two operating segments, our (i)
pharmaceutical research and development segment which is focused on the research and development of
pharmaceutical products, diagnostic tests and vaccines, and (ii) the pharmaceutical operations we
acquired in Chile and Mexico through the acquisition of Pharma Genexx and Pharmacos Exakta. The
instrumentation segment consists of ophthalmic instrumentation products and the activities related
to the research, development, manufacture and commercialization of those products. There are no
inter-segment sales. We evaluate the performance of each segment based on operating profit or
loss. There is no inter-segment allocation of interest expense and income taxes.
16
Table of Contents
Information regarding our operations and assets for the two segments and the unallocated
corporate operations as well as geographic information are as follows:
For the three months ended June 30, | For the six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Revenue |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical |
$ | 5,273 | $ | | $ | 10,585 | $ | | ||||||||
Instrumentation |
2,182 | 2,347 | 4,792 | 4,648 | ||||||||||||
$ | 7,455 | $ | 2,347 | $ | 15,377 | $ | 4,648 | |||||||||
Operating loss |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical |
$ | (1,415 | ) | $ | (1,578 | ) | $ | (2,059 | ) | $ | (6,648 | ) | ||||
Instrumentation |
(998 | ) | (1,310 | ) | (1,934 | ) | (1,989 | ) | ||||||||
Corporate |
(3,114 | ) | (2,359 | ) | (5,600 | ) | (5,192 | ) | ||||||||
$ | (5,527 | ) | $ | (5,247 | ) | $ | (9,593 | ) | $ | (13,829 | ) | |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical |
$ | 529 | $ | 8 | $ | 1,043 | $ | 13 | ||||||||
Instrumentation |
444 | 445 | 888 | 891 | ||||||||||||
Corporate |
20 | 16 | 33 | 31 | ||||||||||||
$ | 993 | $ | 469 | $ | 1,964 | $ | 935 | |||||||||
Revenue |
||||||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 172 | $ | 22 | $ | 369 | $ | 241 | ||||||||
Chile |
4,257 | | 9,194 | | ||||||||||||
Mexico |
1,138 | | 1,391 | | ||||||||||||
All others |
1,888 | 2,325 | 4,423 | 4,407 | ||||||||||||
$ | 7,455 | $ | 2,347 | $ | 15,377 | $ | 4,648 | |||||||||
As of | ||||||||
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Pharmaceutical |
$ | 33,581 | $ | 28,813 | ||||
Instrumentation |
11,113 | 12,262 | ||||||
Corporate |
23,321 | 46,355 | ||||||
$ | 68,015 | $ | 87,430 | |||||
During the three months ended June 30, 2010, our two largest customers represented
approximately 15% and 13% of our total revenue, respectively. During the three months ended June
30, 2009, our four largest customers represented approximately 19%, 16%, 15%, and 13%,
respectively, of our revenue. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, our two largest customers
represented approximately 15% and 13% of our total revenue, respectively. During the six months
ended June 30, 2009, our three largest customers represented approximately 19%, 16%, and 15%,
respectively, of our revenue. As of June 30, 2010, two customers represented approximately 28% and
16% of our accounts receivable balance, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, two customers
represented 32% and 19%, respectively, of our accounts receivable balance.
NOTE 11 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
We have reviewed all subsequent events and transactions that occurred after the date of our
June 30, 2010 consolidated balance sheet date, through the time of filing this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q on August 9, 2010.
17
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
OVERVIEW
You should read this discussion together with the condensed consolidated financial statements,
related Notes, and other financial information included elsewhere in this report and in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Form 10-K). The following
discussion contains assumptions, estimates and other forward-looking statements that involve a
number of risks and uncertainties, including those discussed under Risk Factors, in Part II, Item
1A of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. These risks could cause our actual
results to differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
We are a specialty healthcare company involved in the discovery, development and
commercialization of pharmaceutical products, medical devices, vaccines, diagnostic technologies
and imaging systems. Initially focused on the treatment and management of ophthalmic diseases, we
have since expanded into other areas of major unmet medical need. To date, we have devoted a
significant portion of our efforts towards research and development. As of June 30, 2010, we had
an accumulated deficit of $350.3 million. Since we do not generate revenue from any of our
pharmaceutical product candidates and have only generated limited revenue from our pharmaceutical
operations in Chile and Mexico and our instrumentation business, we expect to continue to generate
significant losses in connection with the research and development activities relating to our
product candidates and other technologies. Such research and development activities are budgeted
to expand over time and will require further resources if we are to be successful. As a result, we
believe that our operating losses are likely to be substantial over the next several years. We
will need to obtain additional funds to further develop our research and development programs, and
there can be no assurance that additional capital will be available to us on acceptable terms, or
at all.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
Revenue.
Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2010, was $7.5 million, compared to $2.3
million for the comparable 2009 period. The increase in revenue during the three months ended June
30, 2010 is primarily due to revenue from our Pharma Genexx and Pharmacos Exakta pharmaceutical
businesses in Chile and Mexico, respectively. We acquired Pharma Genexx in October 2009 and
Pharmacos Exakta in February 2010, and as a result, the 2009 period reflects revenue only from our
instrumentation business. Revenue from our instrumentation business decreased slightly from the
2009 period, primarily as a result of decreased pricing for our OCT/SLO product in international
markets.
Gross margin. Gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2010, was $2.6 million
compared to $0.6 million for the comparable period of 2009. Gross margin for the three months
ended June 30, 2010, increased from the 2009 period primarily as a result of the gross margin
generated by our pharmaceutical business in Chile.
Selling, general and administrative expense. Selling, general and administrative expense for
the three months ended June 30, 2010, was $5.6 million compared to $2.9 million of expense for the
comparable period of 2009. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses primarily
reflects the increase in selling expenses related to our pharmaceutical business as a result of our
acquisitions of Pharma Genexx and Pharmacos Exakta, partially offset by decreased professional
fees. Selling, general and administrative expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, primarily include personnel expenses, including equity-based compensation expense of $1.2
million and $0.8 million, respectively, and professional fees.
Research and development expense. Research and development expense during the three months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, was $1.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively. The decrease for
the three months ended June 30, 2010, primarily reflects the inclusion during the 2009 period of
the estimated shutdown costs of the Phase III clinical trial, including the cost of analyzing the
data collected and performing statistical analysis. Partially offsetting the decrease in research
and development expense was increased activity related to our rolapitant and diagnostic testing
development programs. Research and development expenses during the three months ended June 30,
2010, includes equity-based compensation expense of $0.3 million, compared to $0.4 million for the
2009 period.
Other operating expenses. Other operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010,
as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009, increased by $0.5 million primarily as a
result of the amortization of the intangible assets recorded as part of the acquisition of Pharma
Genexx and also include amortization of intangible
18
Table of Contents
assets recorded as part of the acquisitions of OTI and Pharmacos Exakta. The 2009 period only
include the amortization expense of the intangible assets acquired from OTI.
Other income and expenses. Other expense was $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30,
2010 compared to $0.5 million for the comparable 2009 period. Other income and expenses primarily
consists of income earned from interest on our cash and cash equivalents and interest expense
reflects the interest incurred on our lines of credit. On June 2, 2010 we repaid all amounts
outstanding on The Frost Group, LLC, (the Frost Group) line of credit including $12 million in
principal and $4.1 million in interest. We have the ability to redraw funds under the line of
credit until its expiration in January 2011. The Frost Group members include a trust controlled by
Dr. Frost, who is the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors, Dr.
Jane H. Hsiao, who is the Vice Chairman of the board of directors and Chief Technical Officer,
Steven D. Rubin who is Executive Vice President Administration and a director of the Company and
Rao Uppaluri who is the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.
Income
taxes. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, our income tax provision reflects the income tax payable in Chile, partially
offset by our refundable Canadian provincial tax credit. This credit relates to research and
development expenses incurred at our OTI locations. The income tax
benefit for the three months ended June 30, 2009 reflect only
the refundable Canadian provincial tax credit.
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
Revenue. Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2010, was $15.4 million, compared to $4.6
million for the comparable 2009 period. The increase in revenue during the first six months of
2010 is primarily due to revenue from our Pharma Genexx and Pharmacos Exakta pharmaceutical
businesses in Chile and Mexico. We acquired Pharma Genexx in October 2009 and Pharmacos Exakta in
February 2010, and as a result, the 2009 period reflects revenue only from our instrumentation
business.
Gross margin. Gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2010, was $5.0 million compared
to $1.3 million for the comparable period of 2009. Gross margin for the six months ended June 30,
2010, increased from the 2009 period primarily as a result of the gross margin generated by our
Pharma Genexx pharmaceutical business in Chile.
Selling, general and administrative expense. Selling, general and administrative expense for
the six months ended June 30, 2010, was $9.9 million compared to $6.2 million of expense for the
comparable period of 2009. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses primarily
reflects the increase in selling expenses related to our pharmaceutical business as a result of our
acquisitions of Pharma Genexx and Pharmacos Exakta, partially offset by decreased professional
fees. Selling, general and administrative expenses during the first six months of 2010 and 2009,
primarily include personnel expenses, including equity-based compensation expense of $2.2 million
and $1.5 million, respectively, and professional fees.
Research and development expense. Research and development expense during the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, was $2.9 million and $8.2 million, respectively. The decrease for
the six months ended June 30, 2010, primarily reflects the inclusion during the 2009 period of the
cost of the Phase III clinical trial for bevasiranib until March 6, 2009, when the trial was shut
down. The 2009 period includes the estimated shutdown costs of the trial, including transitioning
patients from the trial onto the standard of care therapy. The shutdown costs include the cost of
analyzing the data collected and performing statistical analysis. Partially offsetting this
decrease was increased activity related to our rolapitant and diagnostic testing development
programs. The six months ended June 30, 2010, includes equity-based compensation expense of $0.5
million, compared to $0.2 million for the 2009 period.
Other operating expenses. Other operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010, as
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009, increased by $1.0 million primarily as a result of
the amortization of the intangible assets recorded as part of the acquisition of Pharma Genexx and
also include amortization of intangible assets recorded as part of the acquisitions of OTI and
Pharmacos Exakta. The 2009 period only includes amortization of the intangible assets acquired
from OTI.
Other income and expenses. Other expense was $0.7 million for the first six months of 2010
compared to $0.9 million for the comparable 2009 period. Other income primarily consists of
interest earned on our cash and cash equivalents and interest expense primarily reflects the
interest incurred on our line of credit with the Frost Group. On June 2, 2010, we repaid all
amounts outstanding on the Frost Group line of credit including $12 million in principal and $4.1
million in interest. We have the ability to redraw funds under the line of credit until its
expiration in January 2011.
19
Table of Contents
Income
taxes. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, our income tax provision reflects the income tax payable in Chile, partially
offset by our refundable Canadian provincial tax credit. This credit relates to research and
development expenses incurred at our OTI locations. The income tax
benefit for the six months ended June 30, 2009, reflect only the
refundable Canadian provincial tax credit.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At June 30, 2010, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of approximately
$19.7 million. Cash used in operations during 2010 primarily reflects expenses related to selling,
general and administrative activities related to our corporate and instrumentation operations, as
well as our Chilean operations. Since our inception, we have not generated sufficient income and
our primary source of cash has been from the private placement of stock and through credit
facilities available to us.
In connection with our acquisition of Pharma Genexx, we entered into line of credit agreements
in the aggregate amount of $16.6 million with seven financial institutions in Chile, of which,
$10.4 million is unused. These lines of credit are used primarily as a source of working capital
for inventory purchases.
We currently have an unutilized $12.0 million line of credit with the Frost Group, a related
party. On June 2, 2010, we repaid all amounts outstanding on the line of credit including $12
million in principal and $4.1 million in interest. We are obligated to pay interest upon maturity,
capitalized quarterly, on outstanding borrowings under the line of credit at an 11% annual rate,
which is due January 11, 2011. The line of credit is collateralized by all of our personal
property except our intellectual property.
We expect to incur losses from operations for the foreseeable future. We expect to incur
substantial research and development expenses, including expenses related to the hiring of
personnel and additional clinical trials. We expect that selling, general and administrative
expenses will also increase as we expand our sales, marketing and administrative staff and add
infrastructure.
We believe the cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities on hand and available to us at
June 30, 2010 will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for operations and debt
service for the next 12 months. We based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong
or are subject to change, and we may be required to use our available cash resources sooner than we
currently expect. If we acquire additional products or companies, accelerate our product
development programs or initiate additional clinical trials, we will need additional funds. Our
future cash requirements will depend on a number of factors, including possible acquisitions, the
continued progress of our research and development of product candidates, the timing and outcome of
clinical trials and regulatory approvals, the costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting,
maintaining, defending and enforcing patent claims, and other intellectual property rights, the
status of competitive products, the availability of financing and our success in developing markets
for our product candidates. If we are not able to secure additional funding when needed, we may
have to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of our clinical trials or research and
development programs.
We intend to finance additional research and development projects, clinical trials and our
future operations with a combination of private placements, payments from potential strategic
research and development, licensing and/or marketing arrangements, public offerings, debt financing
and revenues from future product sales, if any. There can be no assurance, however, that
additional capital will be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Accounting Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Equity-based compensation. We recognize equity based compensation as an expense in our
financial statements and that cost is measured at the fair value of the award and expensed over
their vesting period. Equity-based compensation arrangements to non-employees are recorded at
their fair value on the measurement date. We estimate the grant-date fair value of our stock
option grants using a valuation model known as the Black-Scholes-Merton formula or the
Black-Scholes Model and allocate the resulting compensation expense over the corresponding
requisite service period associated with each grant. The Black-Scholes Model requires the use of
several variables to estimate the grant-date fair value of stock options including expected term,
expected volatility, expected dividends and risk-free interest rate. We perform significant
analyses to calculate and select the
20
Table of Contents
appropriate variable assumptions used in the Black-Scholes Model. We also perform significant
analyses to estimate forfeitures of equity-based awards. We are required to adjust our forfeiture
estimates on at least an annual basis based on the number of share-based awards that ultimately
vest. The selection of assumptions and estimated forfeiture rates is subject to significant
judgment and future changes to our assumptions and estimates may have a material impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Goodwill and intangible assets. The allocation of the purchase price for acquisitions
requires extensive use of accounting estimates and judgments to allocate the purchase price to the
identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired, including in-process research and development
and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values. Additionally, we must determine
whether an acquired entity is considered to be a business or a set of net assets, because a portion
of the purchase price can only be allocated to goodwill in a business combination.
Appraisals inherently require significant estimates and assumptions, including but not limited
to, determining the timing and estimated costs to complete the in-process research and development
projects, projecting regulatory approvals, estimating future cash flows and developing appropriate
discount rates. We believe the estimated fair values assigned to the Pharma Genexx and Pharmacos
Exakta assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on reasonable assumptions. However, the
fair value estimates for the purchase price allocation may change during the allowable allocation
period, which is up to one year from the acquisition date, if additional information becomes
available that would require changes to our estimates.
Allowance for doubtful accounts and revenue recognition. Generally, we recognize revenue from
product sales when goods are shipped and title and risk of loss transfer to our customers. Certain
of our products are sold directly to end-users and require that we deliver, install and train the
staff at the end-users facility. As a result, we do not recognize revenue until the product is
delivered, installed and training has occurred. Return policies in certain international markets
for our medical device products provide for stringent guidelines in accordance with the terms of
contractual agreements with customers. Our estimates for sales returns are based upon the
historical patterns of products returned matched against the sales from which they originated, and
managements evaluation of specific factors that may increase the risk of product returns. We
analyze accounts receivable and historical bad debt levels, customer credit worthiness and current
economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts using the
specific identification method. Our reported net loss is directly affected by managements
estimate of the collectability of accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts
recognized in our consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $0.6
million and $0.4 million, respectively.
Recent accounting pronouncements: In March 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or
FASB, issued updated guidance to amend and clarify how entities should evaluate credit derivatives
embedded in beneficial interests in securitized financial assets. The updated guidance eliminates
the scope exception for bifurcation of embedded credit derivatives in interests in securitized
financial assets, unless they are created solely by subordination of one financial instrument to
another. The update allows entities to elect the fair value option for any beneficial interest in
securitized financial assets upon adoption. This guidance is effective by the first day of the
first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. We have not
adopted this guidance early and are currently evaluating the potential effect of the adoption of
this amendment on our results of operation and financial condition.
In March 2010, the FASB reached a consensus to issue an amendment to the accounting for
revenue arrangements under which a vendor satisfies its performance obligations to a customer over
a period of time, when the deliverable or unit of accounting is not within the scope of other
authoritative literature, and when the arrangement consideration is contingent upon the achievement
of a milestone. The amendment defines a milestone and clarifies whether an entity may recognize
consideration earned from the achievement of a milestone in the period in which the milestone is
achieved. This amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with
early adoption permitted. The amendment may be applied retrospectively to all arrangements or
prospectively for milestones achieved after the effective date. We have not adopted this guidance
early and adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material impact on our results of
operation or financial condition.
In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting for fair value measurements
and disclosures. This amendment details additional disclosures on fair value measurements,
requires a gross presentation of activities within a Level 3 rollforward, and adds a new
requirement to the disclosure of transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 measurements. The new
disclosures are required of all entities that are required to provide disclosures about recurring
and nonrecurring fair value measurements. This amendment was effective as of January 1, 2010, with
an
21
Table of Contents
exception for the gross presentation of Level 3 rollforward information, which is required for
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim reporting periods
within those years. The adoption of the remaining provisions of this amendment is not expected to
have a material impact on our financial statement disclosures.
In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting for multiple-deliverable
revenue arrangements. This amendment provides guidance on determining whether multiple
deliverables exist, how the arrangements should be separated and how the consideration paid should
be allocated. As a result of this amendment, entities may be able to separate multiple-deliverable
arrangements in more circumstances than under existing accounting guidance. This guidance amends
the requirement to establish the fair value of undelivered products and services based on objective
evidence and instead provides for separate revenue recognition based upon managements best
estimate of the selling price for an undelivered item when there is no other means to determine the
fair value of that undelivered item. The existing guidance previously required that the fair value
of the undelivered item reflect the price of the item either sold in a separate transaction between
unrelated third parties or the price charged for each item when the item is sold separately by the
vendor. If the fair value of all of the elements in the arrangement was not determinable, then
revenue was deferred until all of the items were delivered or fair value was determined. This
amendment will be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially
modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption and retrospective
application is also permitted. We have not adopted this guidance early and are currently
evaluating the potential effect of the adoption of this amendment on our results of operations and
financial condition.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
In the normal course of doing business, we are exposed to the risks associated with foreign
currency exchange rates and changes in interest rates.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk Although we do not speculate in the foreign exchange
market, we may from time to time manage exposures that arise in the normal course of business
related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates by entering into offsetting positions
through the use of foreign exchange forward contracts. Certain firmly committed transactions are
hedged with foreign exchange forward contracts. As exchange rates change, gains and losses on the
exposed transactions are partially offset by gains and losses related to the hedging contracts.
Both the exposed transactions and the hedging contracts are translated at current spot rates, with
gains and losses included in earnings.
Our derivative activities, which consist of foreign exchange forward contracts, are initiated
to hedge forecasted cash flows that are exposed to foreign currency risk. The foreign exchange
forward contracts generally require us to exchange local currencies for foreign currencies based on
pre-established exchange rates at the contracts maturity dates. As exchange rates change, gains
and losses on these contracts are generated based on the change in the exchange rates that are
recognized in the consolidated statement of operations at maturity, and offset the impact of the
change in exchange rates on the foreign currency cash flows that are hedged. If the counterparties
to the exchange contracts do not fulfill their obligations to deliver the contracted currencies, we
could be at risk for currency related fluctuations. We enter into these contracts with
counterparties that we believe to be creditworthy and do not enter into any leveraged derivative
transactions. We had $7.9 million in foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding at June 30,
2010, primarily to hedge Chilean-based operating cash flows against US dollars. If Chilean Pesos
were to strengthen in relation to the US dollar, our hedged foreign currency cash-flows expense
would be offset by a loss on the derivative contracts, with a net effect of zero.
We do not engage in trading market risk sensitive instruments or purchasing hedging
instruments or other than trading instruments that are likely to expose us to significant market
risk, whether interest rate, foreign currency exchange, commodity price or equity price risk.
Interest Rate Risk Our exposure to market risk relates to our cash and investments and to
our borrowings. We maintain an investment portfolio of money market funds and treasury securities.
The securities in our investment portfolio are not leveraged, and are, due to their very
short-term nature, subject to minimal interest rate risk. We currently do not hedge interest rate
exposure. Because of the short-term maturities of our investments, we do not believe that a change
in market interest rates would have a significant negative impact on the value of our investment
portfolio except for reduced income in a low interest rate environment. At June 30, 2010, we had
cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $19.7 million. The weighted average interest
rate related to our cash and cash equivalents for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was 0%. As
of June 30, 2010, the principal value of our credit lines was $6.1 million, and have a weighted
average interest rate of 8% for the 6 months then ended.
22
Table of Contents
The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at the same
time maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. To achieve this objective, we invest
our excess cash in debt instruments of the U.S. Government and its agencies, bank obligations,
repurchase agreements and high-quality corporate issuers and money market funds that invest in such
debt instruments, and, by policy, restrict our exposure to any single corporate issuer by imposing
concentration limits. To minimize the exposure due to adverse shifts in interest rates, we
maintain investments at an average maturity of generally less than one month.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Companys management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), has evaluated the
effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 13a-15(e) as of June 30, 2010. Based on that evaluation,
management has concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to
ensure that information the Company is required to disclose in reports that it files or submits
under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO
and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
Changes to the Companys Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In connection with our acquisitions of Pharmacos Exakta and Pharma Genexx, we began
implementing a new accounting system, as well as standards and procedures, upgrading and
establishing controls over accounting systems and adding employees who are trained and experienced
in the preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP to ensure that we have in
place appropriate internal control over financial reporting at Pharma Genexx and Pharmacos Exakta.
Other than as set forth above with respect to Pharma Genexx and Pharmacos Exakta, there have been
no changes to the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Companys second fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are a party to litigation in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that
any such litigation will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
or results of operations.
23
Table of Contents
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors as previously disclosed in the Item
1A of the Company Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
Exhibit 2.1(1)
|
Merger Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of March 27, 2007, by and among Acuity Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Froptix Corporation, eXegenics, Inc., e-Acquisition Company I-A, LLC, and e-Acquisition Company II-B, LLC. | |
Exhibit 2.2(4)+
|
Securities Purchase Agreement dated May 2, 2008, among Vidus Ocular, Inc., OPKO Instrumentation, LLC, OPKO Health, Inc., and the individual sellers and noteholders named therein. | |
Exhibit 2.3(5)
|
Purchase Agreement, dated February 17, 2010, among Ignacio Levy García and José de Jesús Levy García, Inmobiliaria Chapalita, S.A. de C.V., Pharmacos Exakta, S.A. de C.V., OPKO Health, Inc., OPKO Health Mexicana S. de R.L. de C.V., and OPKO Manufacturing Facilities S. de R.L. de C.V. | |
Exhibit 3.1(2)
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. | |
Exhibit 3.2(3)
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws. | |
Exhibit 4.1(1)
|
Form of Common Stock Warrant. | |
Exhibit 31.1
|
Certification by Phillip Frost, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010. | |
Exhibit 31.2
|
Certification by Rao Uppaluri, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010. | |
Exhibit 32.1
|
Certification by Phillip Frost, Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010. | |
Exhibit 32.2
|
Certification by Rao Uppaluri, Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010. |
24
Table of Contents
+ | Certain confidential material contained in the document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. | |
(1) | Filed with the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(2) | Filed with the Companys Current Report on Form 8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 11, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(3) | Filed with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(4) | Filed with the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 2008 for the Companys three-month period ended June 30, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(5) | Filed with the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10, 2010 for the Companys three-month period ended March 31, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference. |
25
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 9, 2010 |
OPKO Health, Inc. |
|||
/s/ Adam Logal | ||||
Adam Logal | ||||
Executive Director of Finance, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer |
26
Table of Contents
Exhibit Index
Exhibit Number | Description | |
Exhibit 31.1
|
Certification by Phillip Frost, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010. | |
Exhibit 31.2
|
Certification by Rao Uppaluri, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010. | |
Exhibit 32.1
|
Certification by Phillip Frost, Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010. | |
Exhibit 32.2
|
Certification by Rao Uppaluri, Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010. |
27