10-K: Annual report pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d)
Published on March 31, 2006
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Form
10-K
(Mark
One)
|
|
R
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
|
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
or
|
|
£
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
|
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For
the transition period
from
to
|
Commission
file number: 000-26648
eXegenics
Inc.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
75-2402409
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
1250
Pittsford-Victor Rd
|
14534
|
Pittsford,
NY
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code:
(585)
218-4375
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of each class
|
Name
of each exchange on which registered
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common
Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share
(Title
of Class)
Indicate
by checkmark if the registrant is a well known seasoned issuer, as defined
in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o
No
x
Indicate
by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o
No
x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes x
No
o
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate
by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check
One).
Large
Accelerated Filer £
|
Accelerated
Filer £
|
Non-accelerated
Filer T
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange
Act Rule 12b-2). Yes o
No
x
The
aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting stock held by non-affiliates
of the registrant (without admitting that any person whose shares are not
included in such calculation is an affiliate) on June 30, 2005 was $4,827,613
based on the last sale price as reported by OTC Bulletin Board.
As
of
March 29, 2006 the registrant had 16,878,090 shares of common stock
outstanding.
1
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You can identify such forward-looking
statements by the words “expects”, “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “believes,”
“estimates,” “likely,” “goal,” “assume” and similar expressions. In the normal
course of business, eXegenics Inc. (“eXegenics” or the “Company”), in an effort
to help keep its stockholders and the public informed about the Company’s
operations may, from time to time, issue such forward-looking statements, either
orally or in writing. Generally, these statements relate to business plans
or
strategies, projected or anticipated benefits or other consequences of such
plans or strategies, or projections involving anticipated revenues, earnings
or
other aspects of operating results. eXegenics bases the forward-looking
statements on its current expectations, estimates and projections. eXegenics
cautions you that these statements are not guarantees of future performance
and
involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that eXegenics cannot predict.
In
addition, eXegenics has based many of these forward-looking statements on
assumptions about future events that may prove to be inaccurate. Therefore,
the
actual results of the future events described in such forward-looking statements
in this Annual Report, or elsewhere, could differ materially from those stated
in such forward-looking statements. Among the factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially are the risks and uncertainties discussed in this
Annual Report, including, without limitation, factors discussed in Item 1,
“Business” and Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations,” including the factors discussed under the
caption “Factors That May Affect Financial Condition and Future Results,”
beginning on Page 5.
2
PART
I
Item
1. Business
General
eXegenics
Inc.,
formerly known as Cytoclonal Pharmaceutics Inc. (the “Company”), was previously
involved in the research, creation, and development of drugs for the treatment
and/or prevention of cancer and infectious diseases. We have historically
operated as a drug discovery company, exploiting new enabling technologies
to
advance and shorten the new drug development cycle. We completed the termination
of all research activities. All scientific staff and administrative positions
were eliminated and all of our research and development activities were
terminated.
Our
Board
and management are focused on redeploying the remaining residual assets of
the
Company. The Board has established a committee to study strategic direction
and
identify potential business opportunities and the Company’s objective continues
to be to redeploy its assets and actively pursue new business opportunities.
On
June
29, 2005 the Company and David E. Riggs mutually agreed that Mr. Riggs would
relinquish his duties as President, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company. Chairman of the Board, John A. Paganelli, assumed the role
of
Interim Chief Executive Officer. On July 1, 2005 David Hostelley was named
Chief
Financial Officer of the Company.
Patents,
Licenses and Proprietary Rights
Prior
to
the termination of all of our research and development programs, our policy
was
to protect technology that we consider important in the development of our
business by, among other things, filing patent applications for such technology.
As we have terminated all drug discovery operations we have not incurred
expenses in maintaining any of our prior patents. Thus any of our patents may
be
subject to challenge and we may lose our rights to such.
License
Agreements
During
2004 and 2005 we did not receive any revenues from the Intellectual
Property Assignment Agreement with NLC Pharma, Inc. The Company did not earn
any
revenue under this agreement during 2005, nor does it anticipate receiving
any
revenues from this agreement in future years.
Competition
As
we
have terminated all research and development programs we do not anticipate
developing any potential products.
3
Insurance
We
have
indemnification agreements with our former directors, in addition to the rights
to indemnification afforded such individuals in our bylaws. The indemnification
agreements require us to maintain directors' and officers' liability insurance
covering at the then current levels of coverage for these individuals for a
period from the date of such agreements until six years after the last date
on
which the individual ceases to be a director, officer, employee, agent or
fiduciary of the Company. There can be no assurance that we will be able to
obtain, maintain or increase our insurance coverage in the future on acceptable
terms or that any claims against us will not exceed the amount of such
coverage.
Employees
On
June
29, 2005 the Company and David E. Riggs mutually agreed that Mr. Riggs would
relinquish his duties as President, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company. Chairman of the Board, John A. Paganelli, assumed the role
of
Interim Chief Executive Officer. On July 1, 2005 David Hostelley was named
Chief
Financial Officer of the Company.
We
engage
independent contractors and temporary employees to perform certain
administrative tasks. Although we believe that we have been successful to date
in attracting skilled, highly qualified personnel, competition for personnel
is
intense and we cannot assure that we will be able to attract and retain highly
qualified personnel. We do not expect any future employees to be governed by
any
collective bargaining agreement.
Factors
That May Affect Financial Condition and Future Results
We
completed the wind down of our drug discovery operations. We continue to be
focused on redeploying the remaining residual assets of the Company. The
following cautionary statements discuss important factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from the projected results contained in
the
forward-looking statements in this report.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At
December 31, 2005 we had cash, cash equivalents and investments of approximately
$8,901,000. Our future capital needs are uncertain. The Company may or may
not
need additional financing in the future to fund any potential transaction the
Company may enter into, a determination to be made when the Company implements
its new business strategy. We do not know whether additional financing will
be
available when needed, or that, if available, we will obtain financing on terms
favorable to our stockholders.
Our
Stock
The
market price of our stock may be negatively affected by market volatility.
The
following factors, in addition to other risk factors described in this section,
may have a significant impact on the market price of our
securities:
-
announcements we make concerning new business development
activities;
-
announcements we make concerning our use of cash to maintain our dormant
operations;
-
regulatory developments in the United States and foreign countries;
-
our
common stock being quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board;
-
current
and new litigation requiring further use of our cash; or
-
economic and other external factors or other disasters or crises.
4
Research
and Development Activities
As
we
have terminated all research and development activities we did not incur any
research and development expenses during fiscal 2005 and 2004 respectively.
Item
1A. Risk
Factors
The
risks
described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks that we do
not
yet know of or that we currently think are immaterial may also impair our
business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business,
operating results or financial condition could be materially harmed. Investors
should also refer to the other information set forth in this Form 10-K,
including the financial statements and the notes thereto.
We
May in the Future make Acquisitions, which Involve Numerous
Risks
Our
objective continues to be to redeploy our assets and actively pursue new
business opportunities. As such, we will be subject to numerous risks, including
the following:
|
•
|
|
The
benefits of any potential business opportunity not materializing
as
planned or not materializing within the time periods or to the extent
anticipated;
|
|
•
|
|
The
possibility that the Company will pay more than the value it derives
from
any potential business opportunity;
|
|
•
|
|
The
assumption of certain known and unknown liabilities of any potential
business opportunity;
|
|
•
|
|
Risks
of entering markets in which the Company has no or limited direct
prior
experience; and
|
Any
business opportunity we pursue will involve a high degree of business and
financial risk, which can result in substantial losses for us. There is
generally going to be no publicly available information about the companies
which we intend to pursue, and we rely significantly on the diligence of our
employees and agents to obtain information. If we are unable to identify all
material information about these companies, among other factors, we may fail
to
receive the value we had expected. In addition, these businesses may have short
operating histories, narrow product lines, small market shares and less
experienced management than their competition and may be more vulnerable to
customer preferences, market conditions, loss of key personnel, or economic
downturns. Depending upon the ultimate structure of any such transaction, we
may
be subject to the risk that such a company may make a business decision that
does not prove to be profitable for the Company.
Our
search for new business opportunities also may be affected by current and future
market conditions. In addition, significant changes in the capital markets
could
have an effect on the valuations of companies and on the potential for liquidity
events involving such companies.
5
The
Business Opportunity We Pursue Could Materially and Adversely Affect Our Results
of Operations and Our Stock Price.
Even
if
we locate a business opportunity, the closing of any such transaction will
be
subject to certain conditions, including us obtaining shareholder approval.
We
cannot provide assurance that the necessary approvals will be obtained, or
that
we will be able to successfully consummate such transaction.
If
we do
not successfully locate a suitable business opportunity:
|
•
|
|
the
market price of our common stock may decline;
|
|
•
|
|
we
will continue to incur costs, including legal, accounting, financial
advisory and other costs relating to us being a public company and
our
ongoing search for a suitable business opportunity; and
|
|
•
|
|
we
may experience a negative reaction if we do not locate a suitable
business
opportunity, or if the Board of Directors does recommend a proposal
to our
shareholders which is not approved, or if such transaction is approved
by
our shareholders and does not produce anticipated
results.
|
The
occurrence of any of these events individually or in combination could have
a
material adverse effect on our results of operations and our stock price.
Any
Business Opportunity We Pursue May Result in a Change of Control and Our Current
Management May not Have Any Power to Influence Us After the Closing of any
such
Transaction
Any
transaction that we engage may result in the owners and management of such
company having actual or effective operating control of us. The owners and
management of such company will have the right to appoint their own officers
and
directors, and our current management will have no ability to influence future
business decisions.
Currently,
There is No Agreement for Any Potential Transaction and No Minimum Guidelines
Have Been Established
The
Company has no current arrangement, agreement or understanding with respect
to
engaging in a transaction with any specific entity. We cannot guarantee that
the
Company will be successful in identifying and evaluating any suitable business
opportunities or in concluding a transaction. We have not selected any
particular industry or specific business within an industry as a potential
target company. The Company has not established any criteria, including a
specific length of operating history or a specified level of earnings, assets,
and/or net worth, which it will require a company to have achieved, or without
which the Company would not consider a transaction with such business entity.
Accordingly, the Company may enter into a transaction with a business entity
having no significant operating history, losses, limited or no potential for
immediate earnings, limited assets, negative net worth or other negative
characteristics. We cannot guarantee you that the Company will be able to
negotiate a transaction on terms favorable to the Company.
Any
Business Opportunity We Pursue Will Possibly Dilute the Value of the Company’s
Securities.
Any
transaction we pursue will involve the issuance of a significant number of
additional shares of the Company's common stock. Depending upon the value of
the
business, the per share value of the Company's common stock may increase or
decrease, perhaps significantly. Any transaction involving the issuance of
the
Company's common stock may result in shareholders of a target company obtaining
a controlling interest in the Company.
6
Any
Transaction We Pursue May Result in Unfavorable Taxation to the Company
Federal
and state tax consequences will, in all likelihood, be major considerations
in
any business opportunity we may pursue. Currently, such transactions may be
structured so as to result in tax-free treatment to both companies, pursuant
to
various federal and state tax provisions. The Company intends to structure
any
transaction so as to minimize the federal and state tax consequences to the
Company. However, there can be no assurance that such business opportunity
will
meet the statutory requirements of a tax-free reorganization or that the parties
will obtain the intended tax-free treatment upon a transfer of stock or assets.
A non-qualifying reorganization could result in the imposition of both federal
and state taxes which may have an adverse effect on both parties to the
transaction and their shareholders.
Certain
of the Company’s Charter Provisions and Delaware Law May Prevent or Deter
Potential Business Opportunities
The
Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended and restated (the
“Certificate of Incorporation”), Bylaws (“Bylaws”) Shareholders Rights
Agreement, and certain provisions of Delaware law contain certain provisions
that may have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing us from
pursuing a potential business opportunity proposal that a stockholder might
consider favorable. The anti-takeover effect of these provisions may also have
an adverse effect on the public trading price of the Company’s common stock.
Section
404 and Other Recently Enacted Regulatory Changes Have Caused, and Will Continue
to Cause the Company to Incur Increased Costs and Operating Expenses and May
Make it More Difficult for the Company to Successfully Pursue New Business
Opportunities
The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and recently enacted rules of the SEC have caused
the
Company to incur significant increased costs as it implements and responds
to
new requirements. In particular, the rules governing the standards that must
be
met for management to assess its internal controls over financial reporting
under Section 404 are new and complex, and require significant
documentation, testing and possible remediation. This ongoing process of
reviewing, documenting and testing the Company’s internal controls over
financial reporting has resulted in, and will likely continue to result in,
a
significant strain on the Company’s management, information systems and
resources. Furthermore, achieving and maintaining compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley
and other new rules and regulations has required the Company to hire additional
personnel and has and will continue to require it to use additional outside
legal, accounting and advisory services.
Any
new
business opportunity pursued by the Company will also put a significant strain
on its management, information systems and resources, which will require
implementation of any changes necessary to maintain effective internal controls
over financial reporting.
Changes
in, or Interpretations of, Accounting Rules and Regulations Could Result in
Unfavorable Accounting Charges
The
Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These
principles are subject to interpretation by the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “SEC”) and various bodies formed to interpret and create
appropriate accounting policies. A change in these policies can have a
significant effect on the Company’s reported results and may even retroactively
affect previously reported transactions.
7
Our
Common Stock Price May be Volatile, Which Could Result in Substantial Losses
for
Stockholders
The
market price of shares of the Company’s common stock has been and is likely to
continue to be highly volatile and may be significantly affected by factors
such
as the following:
|
•
|
|
Actual
or anticipated fluctuations in its operating results;
|
|
•
|
|
Changes
in the economic and political conditions in the United States and
abroad;
|
|
•
|
|
Terrorist
attacks, war or the threat of terrorist attacks and war;
|
|
•
|
|
Developments
in ongoing litigation;
|
|
•
|
|
Failure
to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act;
|
|
•
|
|
Price
and volume fluctuations in the stock market;
|
Item
1B. Unresolved
Staff Comments
Not
applicable.
Item
2. Properties
Our
corporate offices are located at 1250 Pittsford-Victor Road, Building 200,
Suite 280, Pittsford, New York 14534. The Company leases this office space
from RFG Associates, an entity in which John A. Paganelli, chairman of the
Board
of Directors, and Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, is an equity
owner. Monthly rent is $625 and is cancelable by either party upon thirty (30)
days notice. We incurred rent expense and of approximately $10,000 in 2005
and
$20,000 in 2004, respectively.
Item
3. Legal
Proceedings
Labidi
Proceeding.
On
October 5, 2005, in the matter brought by Abdel Hakim Labidi (one of our former
employees) against the Company, a jury ruled in favor of Dr. Labidi determining
that the Company converted certain biological research materials owned by Dr.
Labidi, and the Company committed theft of biological materials owned by Dr.
Labidi. The jury awarded Dr. Labidi a total of $600,000. Dr. Labidi has moved
the Court to award attorney fees and interest on the jury’s award. We await a
decision from the Court on this motion. The Company is reviewing this matter
to
determine the validity of appealing the decision of the jury. The final amount
due by the Company to Dr. Labidi under such judgment is likely to be between
$250,000 and $750,000, however the Company has provided for a reserve of
$250,000 in the financial statements.
Weiss
Litigation.
On
April 12, 2005 the judge, in a ruling from the bench, dismissed the lawsuit
filed by The M& B Weiss Family Limited Partnership of 1996 with prejudice.
Item
4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
During
the fourth quarter of the fiscal year represented by this report, the Company
did not present any matters to be voted upon by its shareholders.
8
PART
II
Item
5. Market
for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Repurchases of Equity Securities
Common
Stock
Our
Common Stock is listed for trading on the Over the Counter Bulletin
Board.
The
following table shows the highest and lowest actual trades of our common stock,
on a per share basis, during each quarterly period within the two most recent
fiscal years, as reported by the National Association of Securities Dealers.
Such prices reflect inter-dealer quotations, without adjustment for any retail
markup, markdown or commission.
|
High
|
Low
|
|||||
2004:
|
|||||||
First
Quarter
|
$
|
1.09
|
$
|
0.68
|
|||
Second
Quarter
|
1.32
|
0.55
|
|||||
Third
Quarter
|
0.85
|
0.35
|
|||||
Fourth
Quarter
|
0.70
|
0.21
|
|||||
2005:
|
|||||||
First
Quarter
|
$
|
0.45
|
$
|
0.32
|
|||
Second
Quarter
|
0.47
|
0.35
|
|||||
Third
Quarter
|
0.44
|
0.36
|
|||||
Fourth
Quarter
|
0.46
|
0.39
|
On
March
29, 2006 the last sale price of our common stock was $0.41.
Stockholders
As
of
March 28, 2006, there were approximately 151 holders of record of our common
stock and, according to our estimates, approximately 2,997 beneficial owners
of
our common stock.
Dividends
We
have
not paid cash dividends to our common stockholders since our inception and
do
not plan to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We currently intend
to
retain earnings, if any.
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
During
the year ended December 31, 2005 we granted options to purchase an aggregate
of
80,000 shares of common stock to employees and directors with a weighted average
exercise price of $0.40 per share. All options issued during 2005 were granted
with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on
the
date of grant.
9
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
As
of December 31, 2005
Plan
Category
|
Number
of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options,
Warrants
and Rights (a)
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and
Rights
(b)
|
Number
of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column(a))
(c)
|
|||||||
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
|
905,000
|
$
|
3.37
|
3,345,000
|
||||||
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders (1)
|
290,000
|
$
|
0.75
|
N/A
|
(1)
Consists of the following warrants: Roan-Meyers dated August 13, 2002 to
purchase 125,000 shares of our common stock; Roan-Meyers warrants, dated August
13, 2002 to purchase 125,000 shares of our common; and Petkevich & Partners,
LLC warrants, to purchase 40,000 shares of our common stock.
We
have
authorized the issuance of equity securities under the compensation plans
described below without the approval of stockholders. No additional options,
warrants or rights are available for issuance under any of these plans, except
for additional shares which may become purchasable under warrants with
anti-dilution protection as noted below. We have either already registered
or
agreed to register for resale the common stock underlying all of these
plans.
Roan-Meyers
warrants, dated August 13, 2002: provided common stock purchase warrants in
connection with financial advisory services, to purchase 125,000 shares of
our
common stock at a purchase price of $1.00 per share, with an expiration date
of
August 13, 2007.
Roan-Meyers
warrants, dated August 13, 2002: provided common stock purchase warrants in
connection with financial advisory services to purchase 125,000 shares of our
common stock at a purchase price of $0.55 per share, with an expiration date
of
August 13, 2007.
Petkevich
& Partners, LLC warrants, dated March 5, 2003, provided common stock
purchase warrants in connection with financial advisory services to purchase
40,000 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $0.58 per share, with
an expiration date of March 5, 2008.
10
Item
6. Selected
Financial Data
The
selected financial data set forth below is derived from our audited financial
statements. Such information should be read in conjunction with Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and
with such financial statements and the notes thereto contained elsewhere in
this
report.
eXegenics
Inc.
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
2002
|
2001
|
|||||||||||
Statement
of Operations Data
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
13,000
|
$
|
562,000
|
$
|
1,333,000
|
||||||
Research
and development
|
—
|
—
|
154,000
|
3,948,000
|
4,843,000
|
|||||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
1,438,000
|
2,051,000
|
2,938,000
|
4,770,000
|
6,448,000
|
|||||||||||
Expenses
related to strategic redirection
|
—
|
—
|
653,000
|
864,000
|
560,000
|
|||||||||||
Merger,
tender offers and consent solicitation expenses
|
—
|
—
|
2,233,000
|
2,010,000
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(1,438,000
|
)
|
(2,051,000
|
)
|
(5,965,000
|
)
|
(11,030,000
|
)
|
(10,518,000
|
)
|
||||||
Gain
on disposition
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
4,000
|
274,000
|
|||||||||||
Gain
on sale of investments (net)
|
1,064,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Interest
income
|
190,000
|
127,000
|
174,000
|
686,000
|
1,383,000
|
|||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(2,000
|
)
|
(2,000
|
)
|
(2,000
|
)
|
(18,000
|
)
|
(6,000
|
)
|
||||||
Loss
before tax benefit and cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle
|
(186,000
|
)
|
(1,926,000
|
)
|
(5,793,000
|
)
|
(10,358,000
|
)
|
(8,867,000
|
)
|
||||||
Tax
benefit
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
82,000
|
|||||||||||
Net
Loss
|
(186,000
|
)
|
(1,926,000
|
)
|
(5,793,000
|
)
|
(10,358,000
|
)
|
(8,785,000
|
)
|
||||||
Preferred
Stock
|
||||||||||||||||
Dividend
|
(234,000
|
)
|
(223,000
|
)
|
(207,000
|
)
|
(169,000
|
)
|
(180,000
|
)
|
||||||
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
(420,000
|
)
|
$
|
(2,149,000
|
)
|
$
|
(6,000,000
|
)
|
$
|
(10,527,000
|
)
|
$
|
(8,785,000
|
)
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per common share
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
$
|
(0.57
|
)
|
|
December
31,
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
2002
|
2001
|
|||||||||||
Balance
Sheet Data
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
9,000,000
|
$
|
10,071,000
|
$
|
11,342,000
|
$
|
17,515,000
|
$
|
27,625,000
|
||||||
Working
capital
|
8,723,000
|
9,829,000
|
10,296,000
|
15,924,000
|
24,949,000
|
|||||||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
$
|
8,723,000
|
$
|
9,832,000
|
$
|
10,304,000
|
$
|
16,074,000
|
$
|
26,121,000
|
11
Item
7. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
In
this section, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations,” references to “we,” “us,” “our,” and “ours” refer to
eXegenics Inc.
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in
its
entirety by, the Financial Statements and the Notes thereto included in this
report. This discussion contains certain forward-looking statements that involve
substantial risks and uncertainties. When used in this report the words
“anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect” and similar expressions as they
relate to our management or us are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ
materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking
statements. Historical operating results are not necessarily indicative of
the
trends in operating results for any future period.
Our
Board
is focused on redeploying the remaining residual assets of the Company. The
Board and management have established a committee to study strategic direction
and identify potential business opportunities. The lawsuit filed by The M&B
Weiss Family Limited Partnership of 1996 was dismissed on April 12, 2005. The
Company faces potential liability of at least $600,000 (exclusive of interest
and legal fees, which have been requested by Dr. Labidi, but not yet determined
by the Court) in connection with the judgment rendered against the Company
in
the lawsuit filed by Dr. Labidi. On June 29, 2005 the Company and David E.
Riggs
mutually agreed that Mr. Riggs would relinquish his duties as President, Chief
Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Chairman of the Board
John
A. Paganelli, assumed the role of Interim Chief Executive Officer. On July
1,
2005 Dave Hostelley was named Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Our
objective in 2006 is to redeploy our assets and actively pursue new business
opportunities. After taking into account the interest earned on our investments
($25,000 to $30,000 per month) we expect to use between $40,000 and $55,000
per
month in 2006 in furtherance of these objectives. This calculation includes
$250,000 in the potential liability faced by the Company in the judgment
rendered against the Company in the suit filed by Dr. Labidi.
Our
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
are
based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The
preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues
and
expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an
on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to
investments, intangible assets, income taxes, contingencies and litigation.
We
base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions
that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results
may
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
12
Critical
Accounting Policies
We
believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant
judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements.
The
Company considers all non-restrictive, highly liquid short-term investments
purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. Investments consist of equity securities and are classified as
available for sale and reported at their fair values. The realized gains and
losses from these investments are reported in current earnings. Unrealized
gains
and losses from these securities are reported as a separate component of
stockholders’ equity and excluded from current earnings.
The
Company has elected to continue to account for its stock-based compensation
plans using the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting Principles
Board
Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB No. 25”) and
provide pro forma net income and pro forma earnings per share disclosures for
employee stock option grants as if the fair-value based method defined in
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, No. 123, “Accounting for Stock
Based Compensation” had been applied. Under the provisions of APB No. 25,
compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the
quoted market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of the grant over
the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock.
Revenue
from research support agreements is recognized ratably over the length of the
agreements. Revenue resulting from contracts or agreements with milestones
is
recognized when the milestone is achieved. Amounts received in advance of
services to be performed, or the achievement of milestones, are recorded as
deferred revenue. Payments to third parties in connection with nonrefundable
license fees are being recognized over the period of performance of related
research and development activities.
The
Company periodically evaluates the collectability of the subscription receivable
and adjusts an allowance sufficient to ensure that the net balance is equal
to
the value of the underlying collateral.
We
record
a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that
is
more likely than not to be realized. While we have considered future taxable
income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing
the
need for the valuation allowance, in the event we were to determine that we
would be able to realize deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its
net
recorded amount, an adjustment to the net deferred tax asset would increase
income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should we determine
that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax asset
in the future, an adjustment to the net deferred tax asset would be charged
to
income in the period such determination was made.
13
Results
of Operations
Fiscal
Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
2004
Revenues
We
recognized $0 from license, research and development revenues during fiscal
2005
and 2004. There was no license, research and development revenue as a result
of
the Company exiting the drug discovery business and termination of related
research and development activities. There were no operations in
2005.
Research
and Development Expenses
We
incurred research and development expenses of $0 during fiscal 2005 and fiscal
2004. This was a result of the Company exiting the drug discovery business
and
termination of related research and development activities.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General
and administrative expenses for fiscal 2005 were $1,438,000 compared to
$2,051,000 for fiscal 2004, a decrease of $613,000 or 42%. General and
administrative expenses decreased primarily as a result of the termination
of
drug discovery operations. Significant variances in fiscal 2005, compared to
fiscal 2004, were as follows: professional consulting fees declined by $60,000,
headcount related expenses, primarily salaries, travel and entertainment, health
insurance, employee relations and office expenses declined by $210,000, investor
and public relations expense declined by $44,000 and insurance, primarily
directors and officers liability insurance expense declined by $435,000, tax
expense, mainly franchise tax declined by $49,000, legal fees declined by
$61,000, leased equipment declined by $60,000, Board of Directors fees and
travel expenses declined by $110,000, audit fees declined by $35,000, an
increase of $250,000 for the reserve established in connection with the pending
lawsuit with Dr. Labidi, and an increase of $201,000 for the allowance recorded
against the subscriptions receivable.
Merger,
Tender Offers and Consent Solicitation Expenses
In
2005
and 2004, we recognized an aggregate of $0 in expenses related to merger, tender
offers and consent solicitation activities.
Expenses
Related to Strategic Redirection
As
a
result of our decision to redirect our business strategy, we incurred $0 and
$5,000 in costs associated with expenses from operations terminated in fiscal
2005 and 2004, respectively. Cash disbursements made during fiscal 2004 against
a previously established restructuring reserve included $90,000 for severance
payments, $87,000 for terminated operating lease obligations, and $16,000 for
equipment and facilities relocation. No expenses were recognized in 2005 or
2004
for the Company’s Strategic Redirection.
14
Interest
Income
Interest
income for fiscal 2005 was $190,000 as compared to $127,000 for fiscal 2004,
an
increase of $63,000 or 50%. The increase in interest income was due to higher
interest rates and increased investable balances resulting from the appreciation
in value and ultimate sale of Javelin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. common
stock.
Other
Income and Expenses
Other
Income and expenses was a profit of $1,062,000 during fiscal year 2005 and
$2,000 during fiscal year 2004. The increase was due to the appreciation and
sale, by the Company, of Javelin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. common
stock.
Net
Loss
We
incurred net losses of $186,000 during fiscal 2005 and $1,926,000 during fiscal
2004. The decrease in net loss of $1,740,000 or 90% is a result of the
aforementioned sale of investments. Net loss per common share for fiscal 2005
was $0.03 and for fiscal 2004 was $0.13.
Fiscal
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
2003
Revenues
We
recognized $0 from license, research and development revenues during fiscal
2004, compared to $13,000 for fiscal 2003, a decrease of $13,000 or 100%. The
decrease was a result of the Company exiting the drug discovery business and
termination of related research and development activities.
Research
and Development Expenses
We
incurred research and development expenses of $0 during fiscal 2004 and $154,000
during fiscal 2003, a year-to-year decrease of $154,000 or 100%. The decrease
was a result of the Company exiting the drug discovery business and termination
of related research and development activities. Significant contributions to
the
overall decrease were as follows: $92,000 decrease in research salaries and
payroll, $3,000 decrease in expenses for research consultants, $29,000 decline
in lease expenses, maintenance and depreciation, $382,000 decrease in research
services and materials, $16,000 decrease in travel and entertainment, health
insurance and other headcount related expenses and $14,000 decline in laboratory
supplies.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General
and administrative expenses for fiscal 2004 were $2,051,000 compared to
$2,938,000 for fiscal 2003, a decrease of $887,000 or 30%. General and
administrative expenses decreased primarily as a result of the termination
of
drug discovery operations. Significant variances in fiscal 2004, compared to
fiscal 2003, were as follows: professional consulting fees declined by $410,000,
headcount related expenses, primarily salaries, travel and entertainment, health
insurance, employee relations and office expenses declined by $85,000, investor
and public relations expense declined by $517,000 and insurance, primarily
directors and officers liability insurance expense increased by $125,000.
Merger,
Tender Offers and Consent Solicitation Expenses
In
2004,
we recognized an aggregate of $0 in expenses related to merger, tender offers
and consent solicitation activities. This compares to $2,233,000 in expenses
related to merger activities during 2003.
15
Expenses
Related to Strategic Redirection
As
a
result of our decision to redirect our business strategy, we incurred costs
of
$5,000 in expenses from operations terminated in fiscal 2004, Cash disbursements
made during fiscal 2004 against a previously established restructuring reserve
included $90,000 for severance payments, $87,000 for terminated operating lease
obligations, and $16,000 for equipment and facilities relocation. We recognized
$0 in expenses related to Strategic Redirection in 2004.
Interest
Income
Interest
income for fiscal 2004 was $127,000 as compared to $174,000 for fiscal 2003,
a
decrease of $47,000 or 27%. The decrease in interest income was due to lower
interest rates and declining investable balances as disbursements were
made.
Net
Loss
We
incurred net losses of $1,926,000 during fiscal 2004 and $5,793,000 during
fiscal 2003. The decrease in net loss of $3,867,000 or 67% is a result of the
aforementioned changes in our operations. Net loss per common share for fiscal
2004 was $0.13 and for fiscal 2003 was $0.38.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At
December 31, 2005 we had cash, cash equivalents and investments of approximately
$8,901,000. During 2005, we used approximately $1,000,000 to fund our operating
activities. Restricted cash was pledged as collateral in support of leases
of
laboratory equipment. In connection with the termination of our drug discovery
research programs, we repurchased equipment subject to a capital lease
agreement. In August 2005, in conjunction with the return of remaining lease
obligations, the lessor of this equipment released $175,000 of the held
collateral. In addition, in 2005 the Company received proceeds of approximately
$1,064,000 from the sale of Javelin Pharmaceuticals, Inc shares of common stock.
The
Company faces potential liability of at least $600,000 (exclusive of interest
and legal fees, which have been requested by Dr. Labidi, but not yet determined
by the Court) in 2006 in connection with the judgment rendered against the
Company in the lawsuit filed by Dr. Labidi. In connection with this potential
liability the Company has recorded a reserve for $250,000.
After
taking into account the interest earned on our investments ($25,000 to $30,000
per month) we expect to use between $40,000 and $55,000 per month in 2006 in
furtherance of these objectives. This calculation includes $250,000 in the
potential liability faced by the Company in the judgment rendered against the
Company in the suit filed by Dr. Labidi. Our future capital needs are uncertain.
The Company may or may not need additional financing in the future to fund
operations, a determination to be made when the Company adopts its new business
strategy. We do not know whether additional financing will be available when
needed, or that, if available, we will obtain financing on terms favorable
to
our stockholders.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncement
We
believe that the adoption of the following accounting standard will not have
a
material impact on our financial statements.
16
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-based Payment.” SFAS No.
123R is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation”,
and supersedes APB 25. Among other items, SFAS 123R eliminates the use of APB
25
and the intrinsic value method of accounting, and requires companies to
recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of
equity instruments, based on the grant date fair value of those awards, in
the
financial statements. The effective date of SFAS 123R is January 1, 2006, for
calendar year companies.
SFAS
123R
permits companies to adopt its requirements using either a “modified
prospective” method, or a “modified retrospective” method. Under the “modified
prospective” method, compensation cost recognized in the financial statements
beginning with the effective date, based on the requirements of SFAS 123R for
all share-based payments granted after that date, and based on the requirements
of SFAS 123 for all unvested awards granted prior to the effective date of
SFAS
123R. Under the “modified retrospective” method, the requirements are the same
as under the “modified prospective” method, but also permits entities to restate
financial statements of previous periods based on proforma disclosures made
in
accordance with SFAS 123.
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
The
Company has no off balance sheet arrangements.
Item
7A. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our
exposure to financial market risk, including changes in interest rates, relates
primarily to our marketable security investments. We generally place our
marketable security investments in high credit quality instruments, primarily
U.S. government obligations and corporate obligations with contractual
maturities of less than one year. We do not believe that a 100 basis point
increase or decrease in interest rates would significantly impact our business.
We do not have any derivative instruments. We operate only in the United States
and all our transactions have been made in U.S. dollars. We do not have any
material exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Item
8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
The
response to this item is submitted in Item 15 of this report.
Item
9. Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
In
September 2005 the Company replaced its then current Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm BDO Seidman, LLP with Rotenberg & Co., LLP. There
were no disagreements with our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s
accounting and financial disclosure for the period covered by this Report.
Item
9A. Controls
and Procedures
(a)
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
|
An
evaluation was carried out by the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s "Disclosure Controls
and Procedures". The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that, given our limited operations, our Disclosure Controls and
Procedures were effective. As such term is used above, the Company’s Controls
and Procedures are controls and other procedures of the Company that are
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company
in
the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures include, without limitation, controls and
procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
the
Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company's
management, including its officers as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
17
(b) |
Internal
Control Over Financial
Reporting
|
There
are
no changes in our Internal Control Over Financial Reporting during the fourth
quarter of 2005.
Item
9B. Other
Information.
There
is
no information required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K during the
fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K but not reported.
PART
III
Item
10. Directors
and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Board
of Directors
Set
forth
below are the names of the persons currently serving as a director, their ages,
their offices in the Company, if any, their principal occupations or employment
for the past five years, the length of their tenure as directors and the names
of other public companies in which such persons hold directorships.
Name
|
Age
|
Position
with the Company
|
||
John
A. Paganelli
|
71
|
Director,
Chairman of the Board, Interim Chief Executive Officer
|
||
Robert
A. Baron
|
65
|
Director
|
||
Robert
Benou
|
71
|
Director
|
||
David
Lee Spencer, M.D.
|
61
|
Director
|
John
A. Paganelli
was
President and Chief Executive Officer of Transamerica Life Insurance Company
of
New York from 1992 to 1997. Since 1987, Mr. Paganelli has been a partner in
RFG
Associates, a financial planning organization. Mr. Paganelli is the Managing
Partner of Pharos Systems Partners, LLC, a company formed to raise capital
to
purchase the controlling interest in Pharos Systems International, a software
development company. Mr. Paganelli is Chairman of the Board of Pharos Systems
International. He was Vice President and Executive Vice President of PEG Capital
Management, an investment advisory organization, from 1987 until 2000. From
1980
to January 2003, Mr. Paganelli was an officer and director-shareholder of Mike
Barnard Chevrolet, Inc., an automobile dealership. Mr. Paganelli was on the
Board of Directors of Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc. from 1999 until 2005.
Mid Atlantic was listed on the New York Stock Exchange and through its wholly
owned subsidiaries is in the business of selling various forms of health
insurance. Mr. Paganelli is also on the Board of Directors of Mid Atlantic's
subsidiary, MAMSI Life and Healthy Insurance Company. Mr. Paganelli holds an
A.B. from Virginia Military Institute. In 2005 Mid Atlantic Medical Services,
Inc. was acquired by UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
Robert
A. Baron
was the
President of Cash City, Inc. since 1999. Cash City is a payday advance and
check
cashing business. Since November 2004 Mr. Baron has been a director of
Hemobiotech, Inc. From 1997 to 1999 Mr. Baron was the President of East Coast
Operations for CSS/TSC, Inc., a distributor of blank t-shirts and fleece and
accessories and a subsidiary of Tultex, Inc., a publicly held company. From
1986
to 1997, Mr. Baron was the chairman of T shirt City, Inc., a privately held
company. From 1993 to 1997, Mr. Baron was a member of the Board of Directors
of
Suburban Bank Corp. When Mr. Baron was on Suburban’s board, its common stock was
traded on Nasdaq. Mr. Baron has a B.S. in Business from Ohio State
University.
18
Robert
S. Benou
has been
a director of Conolog Corporation, a publicly held company that provides
engineering technical personnel placement and manufactures a line of digital
signal processing systems, since 1968 and served as its President from 1968
until May 2001 when he was elected Conolog’s Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer. Mr. Benou has also been a member of the Board of Directors of
Diversified Security Solutions, Inc., since June 2001. Diversified Security
Solutions, Inc. is a publicly held company that is a single-source/turn-key
provider of technology-based security solutions for medium and large companies
and government agencies. Mr. Benou is also a member of Diversified Security
Solutions' audit committee. Mr. Benou is a graduate of Victoria College and
holds a BS degree from Kingston College, England and a BSEE from Newark College
of Engineering, in addition to industrial management courses at Newark College
of Engineering.
David
Lee Spencer, M.D.
has been
an orthopedic surgeon since 1977. Dr. Spencer has been a Clinical Associate
in
orthopedic surgery at the University of Illinois since 1999. Dr. Spencer is
also
an attending surgeon at the University of Illinois Hospital Medical Center
and
Lutheran General Hospital. Dr. Spencer received his B.A. and M.D. degrees from
the University of Iowa.
Committees
of the Board of Directors and Meetings
Committee
Structure.
During
fiscal 2005, the Board of Directors had three permanent committees (Audit
Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee) and one ad hoc
committee (Business Opportunities Search Committee).
Meeting
Attendance.
During
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, there were seven meetings of our Board,
and the various committees met formally a total of four times. All directors
attended a majority of the Board and of committees of the Board on which he
served during fiscal 2005.
Audit
Committee.
Our
Audit Committee met four times during fiscal 2005. This committee consists
of
three members, Robert Benou, Robert Baron and Dr. David Spencer. Our Audit
Committee reviews the engagement of our independent accountants, reviews annual
financial statements, considers matters relating to accounting policy and
internal controls and reviews the scope of annual audits. Mr.
Benou,
Mr. Baron and Dr. Spencer
are “independent” as defined by current National Association of Securities
Dealers’ listing standards. The Board has determined that Robert Benou is
qualified as a financial expert serving on our Audit Committee.
Compensation
Committee.
Our
Compensation Committee held no meetings during fiscal 2005. Robert Baron served
as Chairman and Dr. David Spencer served as committee members. The Compensation
Committee reviews, approves and makes recommendations regarding our compensation
policies, practices and procedures to ensure that legal and fiduciary
responsibilities of the Board of Directors are carried out and that such
policies, practices and procedures contribute to our success.
Nominating
Committee.
During
fiscal year 2005 our Nominating Committee held no meetings. The committee’s
role, following consultation with all other members of the Board of Directors,
was to make recommendations to the full Board as to the size and composition
of
the Board and to make recommendations as to particular nominees. The Nominating
Committee has one sitting member at this time, Dr. David Spencer. Given there
was one member of the Nominating Committee the entire Board of Directors served
in the capacity of the Nominating Committee during 2005.
19
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.
None of
the members of our current Compensation Committee serve
as
a member of the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee of any entity
that
has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board of Directors
or Compensation Committee.
Code
of Ethics
We
have
adopted a code of ethics that applies to our directors and executive officer.
If
we make any substantive amendment to our code of ethics or grant any waiver
from
a provision of the code of ethics to our Chief Executive Officer or Chief
Financial Officer, including an implicit waiver, we intend to satisfy the
information disclosure requirements under Item 10 of Form 8-K regarding
such amendment or waiver. No such waivers or amendments were granted during
2005.
Compliance
with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
Section 16(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s officers and
directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of the Company’s common
stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Officers, directors, and greater than ten
percent shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company
with
copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. The following is a list of persons
who were, during the 2005 fiscal year, a director, officer, beneficial owner
of
more than ten percent of any class of equity securities of the registrant
registered pursuant to section
12
of the
Exchange Act (based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished
to the Company): John Paganelli, Robert Benou, Robert Baron, Dr. David Spencer,
David Hostelley (part of fiscal 2005) and David Riggs (part of fiscal 2005).
Based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company,
the Company believes all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to all
such persons were complied with during the fiscal year covered by this report
except that each of Messrs. Paganelli, Benou, Baron and Spencer filed four
late
reports.
Compensation
of Directors
The
Chairman of the Board receives a fee of $18,750 per quarter, due the day after
the commencement of each calendar quarter for his service. As of July 1, 2005
for assuming additional responsibilities for being the Chairman of the Business
Opportunities Search Committee, Robert Baron is to receive an additional $6,250
per quarter. For additional services provided by Robert Benou and Dr. David
Spencer, both directors are to receive an additional $1,250 per quarter. John
A.
Paganelli, Chairman of the Board, is to receive an additional $6,250 per quarter
for assuming additional responsibilities for serving as Interim Chief Executive
Officer for the Company.
Upon
joining the Board, directors are issued 25,000 shares of common stock. The
chairman of the Board receives an additional 25,000 shares at the time he
assumes this role. Members of the Board of Directors are granted an option
to
purchase 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on the first day of each
calendar quarter, with an exercise price equal to the closing trading price
of
the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. On March 22, 2005, the Board of
Directors approved the grant to each
of
Messrs. Paganelli and Baron 50,000 shares of Common Stock upon the closing
of a
transaction which results in a change of control, provided each such recipient
is a member of the Board at such time. For
the 12 months ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, stock options
totaling 80,000 and 90,000 shares of common stock were granted to directors
pursuant to the Board resolution for services provided by directors,
respectively.
20
Executive
Officer
On
June
29, 2005 the Company and David E. Riggs mutually agreed that Mr. Riggs would
relinquish his duties as President, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company. Chairman of the Board, John A. Paganelli, assumed the role
of
Interim Chief Executive Officer. On July 1, 2005 Dave Hostelley was named Chief
Financial Officer of the Company.
John
A. Paganelli, Interim Chief Executive Officer
See
discussion contained above.
Dr.
David F. Hostelley, Chief Financial Officer
Dr.
Hostelley is a CPA in the states of Ohio and New York. In 1984 he earned his
Ph.D. in management while a lecturer in the MBA Program of Baldwin-Wallace
College. He currently lectures in Accounting and Management for Myers
University, Cleveland, Ohio.
He
has
structured numerous acquisitions in the fields of printing, oil and gas
development, private schools, insurance agencies, hotels, manufacturing, debit
card issuance, health clubs and service entities. In his capacity of trainer
in
the field of Project Management, Dr. Hostelley has taught the executives of:
Ford Motor Company, Westinghouse, National Fuel Gas, General Electric,
Stromberg-Carlson, Doehler-Jarvis, Marvin Windows, Progressive Insurance, EDI
Engineering, Sun Exploration, Tennessee Valley Authority, SPX Corporation,
The
Venezuelan Oil Ministry, Ford Museum in Greenfield Village, and Trans Ohio
Savings and Loan. He has lectured in South Africa, Venezuela, Canada, and the
United States.
He
is now
serving as interim president and board member of the following companies:
Allied
Energy, Inc. (Symbol AGYP.PK); First American Railways, Inc. (Symbol FTRJ.PK);
and IDViews, Inc. (Symbol IDVW.PK). He
currently serves on the Executive Committee of the Cleveland Chapter of the
Muscular Dystrophy Association.
21
Item
11. Executive
Compensation
Summary
Compensation Table
The
following Summary Compensation Table sets forth summary information as to
compensation received by the named Executive Officers and each of our other
most
highly compensated executive officers who were employed by us at the end of
fiscal 2005 for services rendered to us in all capacities during the three
fiscal years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, and who earned in excess
of
$100,000
for
services rendered to us during fiscal 2005.
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual
compensation
|
Long-term
compensation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Awards
|
Payouts
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
and principal position
|
Year
|
Salary
|
Bonus
(1)
|
Other
annual compensation
|
Restricted
stock
award(s)
|
Securities
underlying
options/
SARs
|
LTIP
payouts
|
All
other
compensation
|
|||||||||||||||||
John
A. Paganelli, Interim CEO (2)
|
2005
|
$
|
12,500
|
—
|
$
|
75,000
|
—
|
20,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||||||
2004
|
$
|
75,000
|
—
|
$
|
75,000
|
—
|
20,000
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||||
2003
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dr.
David Hostelley, CFO (3)
|
2005
|
$
|
15,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||||
2004
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||||||
2003
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||||||
David
E. Riggs Former President, CEO, CFO and Secretary (4)
|
2005
|
$
|
244,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||||
2004
|
$
|
235,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
75,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||||||||
2003
|
$
|
190,561
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
225,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||||||||
Ronald
L. Goode, Ph.D. Former President, CEO (5)
|
2005
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||||||||
2004
|
$
|
95,751
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||||||||
2003
|
$
|
405,000
|
$
|
105,000
|
$
|
12,000
(6
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(1) |
Bonuses
paid in the year reported were earned and accrued in the previous
year.
|
(2) |
Mr.
Paganelli is Chairman of the Board of the Company. Mr. Paganelli
became
Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company on June 29, 2005.
Compensation stated in Table under Other Annual Compensation reflects
compensation earned by Mr. Paganelli as the Chairman of the Board
of
Directors of the Company.
|
(3) |
Mr.
Hostelley became Chief Financial Officer of the Company on July 1,
2005.
|
(4) |
Mr.
Riggs served as our President and Chief Executive Officer until June
29,
2005.
|
(5) |
Dr.
Goode served as our President and Chief Executive Officer until February
23, 2004.
|
(6) |
Other
annual compensation for Dr. Goode during fiscal 2003 consisted of
a
$12,000 car allowance.
|
22
Option
Grants in Our Last Fiscal Year
The
following table shows grants of stock options that we made during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2005 to each of our executive officers named in the
Summary Compensation Table, above.
Individual
Grants
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential
Realizable
Value
at Assumed
Annual
Rates of Stock
Price
Appreciation for
Option
Term (2)
|
|||||
Name
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Options
Granted
(#)
|
%
of Total
Options
Granted
to
Employees
in Fiscal Year
|
Exercise
or
Base
Price($/Share)
|
Expiration
Date
|
5%
|
|
10%
|
|||||||||||||
John
A. Paganelli
|
20,000
|
20
|
%
|
$
|
.40
|
Jan.
2015 thru Oct. 2015
|
$
|
13,031
|
$
|
20,750
|
(1)
|
The
options are non-qualified stock options, granted pursuant to the
Company’s
Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan. Options to purchase
20,000
shares of Common Stock, at an average exercise price of $0.40 per
share,
vest immediately on the grant date that ranges from January 1, 2005
through October 1, 2005. These options were granted to Mr. Paganelli
as a
member of the Board of Directors of the
Company.
|
(2)
|
In
accordance with the rules of the SEC, we show in these columns the
potential realizable value over the term of the option (the period
from
the grant date to the expiration date). We calculate this assuming
that
the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant appreciates
at the indicated annual rate, 5% and 10% compounded annually, for
the
entire term of the option and that the option is exercised and sold
on the
last day of its term for the appreciated stock price. These amounts
are
based on assumed rates of appreciation and do not represent an estimate
of
our future stock price. Actual gains, if any, on stock option exercises
will depend on the future performance of our common stock, the option
holder’s continued employment with us through the option exercise period,
and the date on which the option is
exercised.
|
Aggregated
Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option
Values
The
following table shows information regarding exercises of options to purchase
our
common stock by each former executive officer named in the Summary Compensation
Table during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
The
table
also shows the aggregate value of options held by each executive officer named
in the Summary Compensation Table as of December 31, 2005. The value of the
unexercised in-the-money options at fiscal year end is based on a value of
$0.41
per share, the closing price of our stock on the OTC Bulletin Board on
December 30, 2005 (the last trading day prior to the fiscal year end), less
the
per share exercise price.
Number
of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
at
Fiscal
Year-End
|
Value
of the Unexercised
In-The-Money
Options
at
Fiscal Year-End
|
||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Shares
Acquired
on Exercise
|
Value
Realized(1)
|
Exercisable
|
Unexercisable
|
Exercisable
|
Unexercisable
|
|||||||||||||
John
A. Paganelli
|
—
|
N/A
|
40,000
|
—
|
$
|
500
|
N/A
|
||||||||||||
David
E. Riggs
|
—
|
N/A
|
50,000
|
25,000
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
(1) |
Amounts
shown in this column do not necessarily represent actual value realized
from the sale of the shares acquired upon exercise of the option
because
in many cases the shares are not sold on exercise but continue to
be held
by the executive officer exercising the option. The amounts shown
represent the difference between the option exercise price and the
market
price on the date of exercise, which is the amount that would have
been
realized if the shares had been sold immediately upon exercise.
|
23
Employment
Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control
Arrangements
David
E.
Riggs entered into an employment agreement with us on March 10, 2003 to serve
as
our Vice President, Chief Business Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary until March 9, 2006, to be automatically renewed for additional
one-year periods, unless sooner terminated. The employment agreement provides
for the payment to Mr. Riggs of a base salary of $235,000 per year with an
annual bonus payment of up to 30% of Mr. Riggs’s base salary, at the discretion
of the Board of Directors. The employment agreement provides that in the event
Mr. Riggs’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by Mr. Riggs for
good reason, Mr. Riggs shall receive severance payments of equal monthly
installments at the then current base rate until either (i) the expiration
of 12
months following the date of termination, if such date is prior to March 10,
2004, (ii) the expiration of nine months following the date of termination,
if
such date is before March 10, 2005, (iii) the expiration of six months following
the date of termination, if such date is before March 9, 2006, or (iv) the
expiration of six months following the date of termination, if such date is
during a renewal period. The employment agreement contains a one-year
post-termination non-compete, non-solicitation and non-disclosure agreement.
On
or about March 2004 we amended Mr. Riggs employment agreement (the “Amendment”)
to reflect his title of President and Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to
the
Amendment Mr. Riggs was granted an option to purchase 75,000 shares of the
Company’s Common Stock. This Option granted vests in three equal installments:
The first immediately upon the grant date, the second on the first anniversary
of that date and the final upon the second anniversary of that date. Effective
June 30, 2005 the Company and David E. Riggs mutually agreed that Mr. Riggs
would relinquish his duties as President, Chief Executive and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, and the Company entered into a Separation Agreement
with
Mr. Riggs. Chairman of the Board, John A. Paganelli, assumed the role of Interim
Chief Executive Officer. On July 1, 2005 David Hostelley was named Chief
Financial Officer of the Company. The Company’s agreement with Mr. Hostelley
calls for him to receive $2,500 per month, and is terminable by either side
upon
30 days written notice.
PERFORMANCE
TABLE
The
following table compares the annual percentage change in our cumulative total
stockholder return on our common stock during a period commencing on December
31, 2001 and ending on December 31, 2005 (as measured by dividing (A) the sum
of
the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend
reinvestment, and the difference between our share price at the end and the
beginning of the measurement period; by (B) our share price at the beginning
of
the measurement period) with the cumulative total return of the Nasdaq Stock
Market our peer group (Nasdaq Biotech Index) during such period. We have not
paid any dividends on our common stock, and we do not include dividends in
the
representation of our performance. The stock price performance on the graph
below does not necessarily indicate future price performance.
COMPARE
5-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG
EXEGENICS
INC.
NASDAQ
MARKET INDEX AND SIC CODE INDEX
(PERFORMANCE
TABLE)
2001
|
2002
|
2003
|
2004
|
2005
|
||||||||||||
EXEGENICS
INC
|
$
|
100.00
|
$
|
10.51
|
$
|
27.03
|
$
|
10.21
|
$
|
12.31
|
||||||
NASDAQ
Market Index
|
$
|
100.00
|
$
|
68.47
|
$
|
102.72
|
$
|
111.54
|
$
|
113.07
|
||||||
Nasdaq
Biotech Index
|
$
|
100.00
|
$
|
54.67
|
$
|
79.68
|
$
|
84.57
|
$
|
86.96
|
24
Item
12.
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
The
table
below shows the number of shares of our common stock and series A preferred
stock beneficially owned as of March 28, 2006 by the following
persons:
• |
each
stockholder known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of the
outstanding shares of either the common stock or series A preferred
stock;
|
• |
each
current member of the Board of Directors;
|
• |
our
Interim Chief Executive Officer and our single highly compensated
executive officers who earned more than $100,000 during the fiscal
year
ended December 31, 2005 referred to below as our named executive
officer;
and,
|
• |
all
directors and named executive officer as a group.
|
To
our
knowledge and unless otherwise indicated, each person in the table has sole
voting power and investment power, or shares such power with his or her spouse,
with respect to all shares of capital stock listed as owned by such person.
The
Company is not aware of any arrangements which may at a subsequent date result
in a change of control of the Company.
The
number of shares beneficially owned by each stockholder is determined under
the
rules promulgated by the SEC. The information is not necessarily indicative
of
beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under these rules, beneficial
ownership includes any shares as to which the individual has sole or shared
voting power or investment power and any shares as to which the individual
has
the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days after March 21, 2006
through the exercise of any option, warrant or other right. The inclusion in
the
following table of those shares, however, does not constitute an admission
that
the named stockholder is a direct or indirect beneficial owner of those
shares.
Common
Stock
|
Series
A Preferred Stock
|
|||||||||||||||
Name
and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)
|
Number
|
Percent
of
Class (2)
|
Number
|
Percent
of
Class (3)
|
Percent
of all
Voting
Securities (4)
|
|||||||||||
Bruce
Meyers (5)
|
1,224,277
|
7.35
|
%
|
39,051
|
3.85
|
%
|
7.20
|
%
|
||||||||
J.
Morton Davis and Rosalind Davidowitz (6) .
|
1,553,900
|
9.49
|
%
|
—
|
—
|
8.99
|
%
|
|||||||||
John
A. Paganelli (7).
|
95,000
|
*
|
—
|
—
|
*
|
|||||||||||
Robert
A. Baron (8)
|
114,800
|
*
|
—
|
—
|
*
|
|||||||||||
Robert
Benou (9)
|
70,000
|
*
|
—
|
—
|
*
|
|||||||||||
David
Lee Spencer, M.D (10).
|
844,100
|
5.14
|
%
|
—
|
—
|
4.88
|
%
|
|||||||||
David
E. Riggs (11)
|
82,200
|
*
|
—
|
—
|
*
|
|||||||||||
David
Hostelley
|
—
|
*
|
||||||||||||||
Directors
and executive officers as a group
(5 persons) (12)
|
1,131,100
|
6.84
|
%
|
—
|
—
|
6.54
|
%
|
* |
Less
than One Percent.
|
(1)
|
Except
as otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner is c/o
eXegenics
Inc., 1250 Pittsford-Victor Road, Pittsford, New York
14534.
|
(2)
|
Calculated
on the basis of 16,367,090 shares of common stock issued and outstanding
as of March 28, 2006 except that shares of common stock underlying
options
and warrants exercisable within 60 days of the date hereof are deemed
to
be outstanding for purposes of calculating the beneficial ownership
of
securities of the holder of such options or warrants. This calculation
excludes shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of series
A
preferred stock.
|
25
(3) | Calculated on the basis of 1,015,028 shares of series A preferred stock outstanding as of March 28, 2006. |
(4)
|
Calculated
on the basis of an aggregate of 16,367,090 shares of common stock
and
1,015,028 shares of series A preferred stock issued and outstanding
as of
March 28, 2006, except that shares of common stock underlying options
and
warrants exercisable within 60 days of the date hereof are deemed
to be
outstanding for purposes of calculating beneficial ownership of securities
of the holder of such options or warrants.
|
(5)
|
Mr.
Meyers' address is c/o Meyers Associates, L.P., 45 Broadway, New
York, New
York 10006. The amount shown for Mr. Meyers includes: 859,645 shares
owned
by Mr. Meyers; 4,740 shares owned by the Bruce Meyers Keogh; 33,800
shares
of the Company's common stock owned by the Joseph Rita and Bruce
Meyers
Foundation for Life Inc. (Mr. Meyers is the Chairman of the Board
of the
Joseph Rita and Bruce Meyers Foundation for Life), 39,051 shares
of the
Company's common stock issuable upon the conversion of 39,051 shares
of
preferred stock owned by Bruce Meyers; and the following securities
owned
by Meyers Associates, L.P. of which Mr. Meyers, is an executive
officer,
the sole shareholder and director of the general partner of Meyers
Associates, L.P.; 76,092 shares of common stock, and 250,000 shares
of
common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently exercisable
five-year
warrants issued in 2002 to Meyers Associates, L.P. A portion of
the shares
beneficially owned by Mr. Meyers were obtained for services provided
by
Meyers Associates, L.P. a registered broker dealer. The services
provided
by Meyers Associates, L.P. included acting as financial advisor,
placement
agent and/or underwriter to the Company. Beneficial ownership information
taken from Schedule 14A file number 03896368 filed September 15,
2003.
|
(6) | Beneficial ownership information and the information under this footnote taken from Schedule 13G filed February 7, 2006. As of December 31, 2005 Mr. Davis may be deemed beneficially own: (i) 248,000 shares of common stock owned by D.H. Blair Investment Banking Corp. ("Blair Investment"), and (ii) 1,305,900 shares owned by Rosalind Davidowitz (Mr. Davis’ wife). Mr. Davis' business address is 44 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005. Ms. Davidowitz's address is 7 Sutton Place South, Lawrence, New York 11559. As of December 31, 2005 Rosalind Davidowitz may be deemed to beneficially own 1,305,900 shares of common stock owned directly by Rosalind Davidowitz, and 248,000 shares of common stock owned by Blair Investment. Mr. Davis has sole power to vote or to direct the vote, to dispose or to direct the disposition of those shares owned by Blair Investment. Ms. Davidowitz has sole power to vote or to direct the disposition of those shares owned directly by her. Each of Ms. Davidowitz and Mr. Davis do not deem the filing of the aforementioned Schedule 13G as an admission by each of beneficial ownership of the securities owned by the other. |
(7) | Ownership consists of 50,000 shares of common stock and options to purchase 45,000 shares of common stock currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the date hereof. |
(8)
|
Ownership
consists of 69,800 shares of common stock and options to purchase
45,000
shares of common stock currently exercisable or exercisable within
60 days
of the date hereof.
|
(9)
|
Ownership
consists of 25,000 shares of common stock and options to purchase
45,000
shares of common stock currently exercisable or exercisable within
60 days
of the date hereof.
|
(10)
|
Ownership
consists of 799,100 shares of common stock and options to purchase
45,000
shares of common stock currently exercisable or exercisable within
60 days
of the date hereof.
|
(11)
|
Ownership
consists of 7,200 shares of common stock and options to purchase
75,000
shares of common stock currently exercisable or exercisable within
60 days
of the date hereof. Does not include options to purchase 25,000
shares of
common stock not exercisable within 60 days of the date
hereof.
|
(12) | Ownership consists of 951,100 shares of common stock and options to purchase an aggregate of 180,000 shares of common stock, which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the date hereof. |
Item
13. Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
Since
the
beginning of fiscal 2005, the Company is not a party to any transaction or
series of transactions in an amount exceeding $60,000 in which any Director
or
Executive Officer of the Company has a direct or indirect interest.
Since
the
beginning of fiscal 2005 none of the Company’s Directors or Executive Officers
is indebted to the Company in an amount in excess of $60,000.
There
is
no disclosable business relationship with any Director under Item 404(b) of
Regulation S-K
26
Item
14. Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
The
following represents fees for professional audit services rendered by Rotenberg
& Company, LLP for the audit of our annual financial statements for the
years ended December 31, 2005 and BDO Seidman, LLP for the period ending
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 (BDO Seidman, LLP and Rotenberg &
Company, LLP are collectively “our principal accountants”).
Audit
Fees
Our
principal accountants billed us an aggregate of $29,000 and $62,000 in fees
and
expenses for professional services rendered in connection with the audits of
our
financial statements for the calendar years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, and reviews of the financial statements included in our quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q during such calendar years.
Audit
Related Fees
Our
principal accountants billed us an aggregate of $23,000 and $31,000 for
assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance
of
the audit of our financial statements and not included above, for the calendar
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Tax
Fees
Our
principal accountants billed us an aggregate of $15,000 and $20,000 in fees
and
expenses for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning during calendar years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
All
Other Fees
Our
principal accountants did not bill us any additional fees that are not disclosed
under audit fees, audit related fees or tax fees in each of the last two
calendar years.
Audit
Committee Pre-Approval Process, Policies and Procedures
On
January 6, 2006, the Audit Committee of the Board and full Board approved the
appointment of Rotenberg & Company, LLP as replacement auditors to BDO
Seidman, LLP. Our principal accountants have performed their audit procedures
in
accordance with pre-approved policies and procedures established by our Audit
Committee. Our principal auditors have informed our Audit Committee of the
scope and nature of each service provided. With respect to the provisions
of services other than audit, review, or attest services, our principal
accountants brought such services to the attention of our Audit Committee,
or
one or more members of our Audit Committee for the members of our Board of
Directors to whom authority to grant such approval had been delegated by the
Audit Committee, prior to commencing such services. Such services
primarily consisted of due diligence and tax related services.
PART
IV
Item
15. Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules.
(a)(1)
Report of Rotenberg & Company, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
Report
of
BDO Seidman, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
27
Balance
Sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004
Statements
of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
Statements
of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003
Statements
of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
Notes
to
Financial Statements
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
All
schedules have been omitted because the required information is included in
the
financial statements or notes thereto or because they are not
required.
28
(3) Exhibits
3.1
|
—
|
Certificate
of Incorporation, as amended(l)
|
3.2
|
—
|
By-laws(l)
|
3.3
|
—
|
Certificate
of Correction to the Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate
of
Incorporation of eXegenics
Inc. filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on July 14, 2003
(10)
|
4.1
|
—
|
Specimen
certificates representing Class C Warrants, Class D Warrants and
Common
Stock(l)
|
4.3
|
—
|
Form
of Unit Purchase Option in connection with eXegenics
Inc.’s Initial Public Offering(l)
|
4.4
|
—
|
Warrant
Certificate issued to the Washington State University Research
Foundation(4)
|
4.5
|
—
|
Stockholders
Rights Agreement, dated June 9, 2003, between eXegenics
Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, which includes as
Exhibit A the Form of Certificate of Designations of Series B Junior
Participating Preferred Stock, as Exhibit B the Form of Rights Certificate
and as Exhibit C the Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred
Stock(11)
|
4.6
|
—
|
Amendment
to Stockholders Rights Agreement entered into as of July 16, 2003,
by and
between eXegenics
Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent
(10)
|
4.7
|
—
|
Form
of Warrant Agreement between eXegenics
Inc. and Gruntal & Co., LLC (15)
|
4.8
|
—
|
Form
of Warrant Agreement between eXegenics
Inc. and Roan Meyers Associates LP (15)
|
4.9
|
—
|
Form
of Warrant Agreement between eXegenics
Inc. and Petkevich & Partners, LLC (15)
|
10.1
|
—
|
Employment
Agreement dated March 1, 1992 between eXegenics
Inc. and Arthur P. Bollon, Ph.D., as amended(1)
|
10.2
|
—
|
1992
Stock Option Plan, as amended(l)
|
10.3
|
—
|
Form
of Stock Option Agreement(l)
|
10.4
|
—
|
Lease
Agreement dated October 1, 1991 between eXegenics
Inc. and J.K. and Susie Wadley Research Institute and Blood Bank,
as
amended(l)
|
10.5
|
—
|
Security
Agreement dated October 10, 1991 between eXegenics
Inc. and Wadley(l)
|
10.6
|
—
|
License
Agreement dated June 10, 1993 between eXegenics
Inc. and Research & Development Institute, Inc. (“RDI”), as amended,
relating to the Paclitaxel Fermentation Production
System(l)
|
10.7
|
—
|
Research
and Development Agreement effective June 10, 1993 between eXegenics
Inc. and RDI, as amended(l)
|
10.8
|
—
|
License
Agreement dated February 22, 1995 between eXegenics
Inc. and RDI, as amended, relating to FTS-2(l)
|
10.9
|
—
|
Agreement
effective June 30, 1992 between eXegenics
Inc. and University of Texas at Dallas (“UTD”), as
amended(l)
|
10.10
|
—
|
Extension
Agreement with RDI dated June 5, 1995(l)
|
10.11
|
—
|
Third
Amendment to Lease Agreement dated April 30, 1995(l)
|
10.12
|
—
|
September
25, 1995 RDI Extension(l)
|
10.13
|
—
|
October
25, 1995 RDI Extension(1)
|
10.14
|
—
|
Amendment
to License Agreement dated June 10, 1993, as amended, and Research
and
Development Agreement effective June 10, 1993, as amended, both agreements
between eXegenics
Inc. and RDI(2)
|
29
10.15
|
—
|
License
Agreement No. W960206 effective February 27, 1996 between eXegenics
Inc. and The Regents of the University of California(2)
|
10.16
|
—
|
License
Agreement No. W960207 effective February 27, 1996 between eXegenics
Inc. and The Regents of the University of California(2)
|
10.17
|
—
|
License
Agreement with the Washington State University, dated July 2,
1996(3)*
|
10.18
|
—
|
Amendment
to Agreement, effective June 30, 1992, as amended, between eXegenics
Inc. and the University of Texas at Dallas(3)
|
10.19
|
—
|
1996
Stock Option Plan and Amendment No. 1 thereto(7)
|
10.20
|
—
|
Patent
License Agreement, dated August 4, 1998, between The Regents of the
University of California and eXegenics
Inc. for Peptide Anti-estrogen for Breast Cancer
Therapy(5)*
|
10.21
|
—
|
Master
License Agreement, dated as of June 12, 1998, between eXegenics
Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company(6)*
|
10.22
|
—
|
Sublicense
Agreement, dated May 27, 1998, between eXegenics
Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb under The Research & Development
Institute, Inc. License Agreement, as amended, dated June 10,
1998(6)*
|
10.23
|
—
|
Sublicense
Agreement, dated May 19, 1998, between eXegenics
Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company under the Washington State
University Research Foundation License Agreement, dated June 8,
1996(6)*
|
10.24
|
—
|
Amended
and Restated License Agreement, dated June 3, 1998, between the Washington
State University Research Foundation and eXegenics
Inc.(6)*
|
10.25
|
—
|
Amendment,
dated May 27, 1998, to the License Agreement, dated June 10, 1993,
between
The Research and Development Institute, Inc. and eXegenics
Inc.(6)*
|
10.26
|
—
|
Amended
and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan(7)
|
10.27
|
—
|
Employment
Agreement dated March 21, 2001, between eXegenics
Inc. and Ronald L. Goode, Ph.D.(8)
|
10.28
|
—
|
Employment
Agreement dated March 13, 2003, between eXegenics
Inc. and David E. Riggs(13)
|
10.29
|
—
|
Termination
Agreement dated November 25, 2002 between eXegenics
Inc., Innovative Drug Delivery Systems, Inc., and IDDS Merger
Corp(9)
|
10.30
|
—
|
Amendment,
dated September 9, 2003, to Employment Agreement dated March 20,
2001,
between eXegenics
Inc. and Ronald L. Goode, Ph.D(12)
|
10.31
|
—
|
Amendment,
dated October 16, 2003, to Employment Agreement dated March 20, 2001,
between eXegenics
Inc. and Ronald L. Goode, Ph.D(12)
|
10.32
|
—
|
Form
of Indemnification Agreement by and among eXegenics
and certain of its current and former directors and officers
(10).
|
10.33
|
—
|
Promissory
Note and Pledge Agreement between eXegenics
Inc.
and Ronald L. Goode, Ph.D. (14).
|
10.34
|
—
|
Amendment,
dated March 30, 2004, to Employment Agreement dated March 13,
2003, between eXegenics
Inc.
and David E. Riggs (14).
|
10.35
|
—
|
Termination
Letter dated April 10, 2003 by and between eXegenics
Inc. and Dorit Arad (14).
|
10.36
|
—
|
Termination
Letter Agreement dated April 30, 2003 by and between eXegenics
Inc. and Joan Gillett (14).
|
10.37
|
—
|
Separation
from Employment Letter Agreement dated January 10, 2003 by and
between eXegenics
Inc. and Arthur P. Bollon (14).
|
10.38
|
Sublease
Agreement between
eXegenics
Inc. and RFG Associates dated as of January 1, 2004
(16).
|
|
10.39
|
Intellectual
Property Assignment Agreement between
eXegenics
Inc. and NLC Pharma, Inc. (17)
|
|
10.40
|
Separation
Agreement between
eXegenics
Inc. and David Riggs dated July 26, 2005 (18).
|
|
10.41
|
Agreement
between
eXegenics
Inc. and David Hostelley dated July 20, 2005 (18).
|
|
23.1
|
—
|
Consent
of BDO Seidman, LLP
|
31.1
|
—
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2
|
—
|
Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
—
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
32.2
|
—
|
Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
* |
Confidential
portions omitted and filed separately with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
|
30
(1) |
Previously
filed as an exhibit to eXegenics
Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 33-91802) and are
incorporated by reference herein.
|
(2) |
Previously
filed as an exhibit to eXegenics
Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1995
and are incorporated by reference
herein.
|
(3) |
Previously
filed as an exhibit to eXegenics
Inc.’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form SB-2 (File No. 33-91802)
and
are incorporated by reference
herein.
|
(4) |
Previously
filed as an exhibit to eXegenics
Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-13409) and is
incorporated by reference herein.
|
(5) |
Previously
filed as an exhibit to the Post-Effective Amendment to eXegenics
Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 on Form S-3 (File No.
333-13409) and is incorporated by reference
herein.
|
(6) |
Previously
filed as an exhibit to eXegenics
Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26078) and is incorporated
by reference herein.
|
(7) |
Previously
filed as an appendix to eXegenics
Inc.’s Schedule 14-A (File No. 000-26078) and is incorporated by reference
herein.
|
(8) |
Previously
filed as an exhibit to eXegenics
Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-26078) for the year ended
December 31, 2000 and is incorporated by reference
herein.
|
(9) |
Previously
filed as an exhibit to eXegenics
Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26078) and is incorporated
by reference herein.
|
(10) |
Previously
filed as an exhibit to eXegenics
Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
(File No. 000-26078), filed August 14,
2003.
|
(11) |
Previously
filed as an exhibit to eXegenics
Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26078), filed June 9,
2003.
|
(12) |
Previously
filed as an exhibit to eXegenics
Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 (File No. 000-26078), filed November 14,
2003.
|
(13) |
Previously
filed as an exhibit to eXegenics
Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-26078) for the year ended
December 31, 2002.
|
(14) |
Previously
filed as an exhibit to eXegenics
Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-26078) for the year ended
December 31, 2003.
|
(15) |
Previously
filed as an exhibit to eXegenics
Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
(File No. 000-26078), filed May 14,
2004.
|
(16) |
Previously
filed as an exhibit to eXegenics
Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004
(File No. 000-26078), filed August 16,
2004
|
(17) |
Previously
filed as an exhibit to eXegenics
Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26078), filed September
10, 2004.
|
(18) |
Previously
filed as an exhibit to eXegenics
Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005
(File No. 000-26078), filed August 15,
2005
|
(c) Refer
to
(a) 3 above.
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
EXEGENICS INC. | ||
|
|
|
Date: March 31, 2006 | By: | /s/ JOHN A. PAGANELLI |
Name: John A. Paganelli |
||
Title: Chairman
of the Board
Interim
Chief Executive
Officer
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has
been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities indicated below and on the dates indicated.
|
Signatures
|
Title
|
Date
|
||
By:
|
/s/
JOHN A. PAGANELLI
|
Director,
Chairman of the Board
|
March
31, 2006
|
||
John
A. Paganelli
|
Interim
Chief Executive Officer
|
||||
By:
|
/s/
DAVID HOSTELLEY
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
March
31, 2006
|
||
David
Hostelley
|
|||||
By:
|
/s/
ROBERT A. BARON
|
Director
|
March
31, 2006
|
||
Robert
A. Baron
|
|||||
By:
|
/s/
ROBERT S. BENOU
|
Director
|
March
31, 2006
|
||
Robert
S. Benou
|
|||||
By:
|
/s/
DAVID LEE SPENCER
|
Director
|
March
31, 2006
|
||
David
Lee Spencer
|
32
CONTENTS
Financial
Statements
|
Page
|
Report
of Rotenberg & Company, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
F-1
|
Report
of BDO Seidman, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
F-2
|
Balance
sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004
|
F-3
|
Statements
of operations for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003
|
F-4
|
Statements
of changes in stockholders’ equity for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003
|
F-5
|
Statements
of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003
|
F-6
|
Notes
to financial statements
|
F-7
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To
the
Board of Directors
and
Stockholders
eXegenics
Inc.
We
have
audited the accompanying balance sheet of eXegenics Inc. as of December 31,
2005, and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders'
equity,
and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that
we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining,
on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of eXegenics Inc. as of December
31,
2005 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then
ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United
States of America.
/s/ Rotenberg & Co., LLP | |||
|
|||
Rotenberg
&
Co., LLP
Rochester,
New York
February
27, 2006
|
F-1
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board
of
Directors and Stockholders
eXegenics
Inc.
We
have
audited the accompanying balance sheets of eXegenics
Inc.
(the Company) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements
of
operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that
we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement.
The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit
of
its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration
of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate
in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining,
on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In
our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of eXegenics
Inc. as
of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its
cash
flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
BDO
Seidman, LLP
Dallas,
Texas
February
18, 2005 except for Notes K and
N
which
are as of April 12, 2005
F-2
eXegenics
Inc.
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
|||||||
December
31,
|
|||||||
2005
|
2004
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
8,901,000
|
$
|
8,734,000
|
|||
Restricted
cash
|
—
|
175,000
|
|||||
Marketable
securities available for sale
|
—
|
1,124,000
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
99,000
|
35,000
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
9,000,000
|
10,068,000
|
|||||
Equipment,
net
|
—
|
3,000
|
|||||
$
|
9,000,000
|
$
|
10,071,000
|
||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$
|
277,000
|
$
|
239,000
|
|||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock — $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; 952,839 and 935,332
shares of Series A convertible
preferred
issued and outstanding (liquidation value $2,382,000 and
$2,338,000)
|
10,000
|
9,000
|
|||||
Common
stock — $.01 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 16,945,026 and
16,869,031 shares issued
|
169,000
|
169,000
|
|||||
Additional
paid in capital
|
68,384,000
|
68,385,000
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
—
|
1,124,000
|
|||||
Subscriptions
receivable, net of reserve
|
(101,000
|
)
|
(302,000
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(56,402,000
|
)
|
(56,216,000
|
)
|
|||
Treasury
stock, 611,200 and 611,200 shares of common stock, at cost
|
(3,337,000
|
)
|
(3,337,000
|
)
|
|||
8,723,000
|
9,832,000
|
||||||
$
|
9,000,000
|
$
|
10,071,000
|
See
notes
to financial statements
F-3
eXegenics
Inc.
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
|||||||
Revenue:
|
||||||||||
License
and research fees
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
13,000
|
||||
Operating
expenses:
|
||||||||||
Research
and development
|
—
|
—
|
154,000
|
|||||||
General
and administrative
|
1,438,000
|
2,051,000
|
2,938,000
|
|||||||
Expenses
related to strategic redirection
|
—
|
—
|
653,000
|
|||||||
Merger,
tender offers and consent solicitation expenses
|
—
|
—
|
2,233,000
|
|||||||
1,438,000
|
2,051,000
|
5,978,000
|
||||||||
Other
(income) expenses:
|
||||||||||
Gain
on sale of investments, net
|
(1,064,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Interest
income
|
(190,000
|
)
|
(127,000
|
)
|
(174,000
|
)
|
||||
Interest
expense
|
2,000
|
2,000
|
2,000
|
|||||||
(1,252,000
|
)
|
(125,000
|
)
|
(172,000
|
)
|
|||||
Loss
before provision (benefit) for taxes
|
(186,000
|
)
|
(1,926,000
|
)
|
(5,793,000
|
)
|
||||
Provision
(benefit) for taxes
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
Net
Loss
|
(186,000
|
)
|
(1,926,000
|
)
|
(5,793,000
|
)
|
||||
Preferred
stock dividend
|
(234,000
|
)
|
(223,000
|
)
|
(207,000
|
)
|
||||
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
(420,000
|
)
|
$
|
(2,149,000
|
)
|
$
|
(6,000,000
|
)
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per common share:
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding — basic and
diluted
|
16,271,000
|
16,050,000
|
15,690,000
|
See
notes
to financial statements
F-4
eXegenics
Inc.
STATEMENTS
OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
Accumulated
Other
|
Treasury
Stock
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible
Preferred
Stock
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid
in
|
Subscriptions
|
Reserve
on
|
Accumulated
|
Comprehensive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Receivable
|
Subscp.
Rec
|
Deficit
|
Income
(Loss)
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
— January 1, 2003
|
828,023
|
$
|
8,000
|
16,184,486
|
$
|
162,000
|
67,272,000
|
(301,000
|
)
|
—
|
(48,497,000
|
)
|
—
|
511,200
|
($2,570,000
|
)
|
16,074,000
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock converted to common stock
|
(20,293
|
)
|
—
|
20,293
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
dividend (stock)
|
82,834
|
1,000
|
—
|
—
|
(1,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest on Subscription Receivable
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(1,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
—
|
—
|
10,000
|
—
|
4,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
4,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares previously recorded as issuance from Treasury Stock
|
—
|
—
|
100,000
|
1,000
|
766,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
100,000
|
(767,000
|
)
|
—
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value
assigned to warrants and options issued for professional services
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
20,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
20,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss for the year
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(5,793,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(5,793,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
— December 31, 2003
|
890,564
|
9,000
|
16,314,779
|
163,000
|
68,061,000
|
(302,000
|
)
|
—
|
(54,290,000
|
)
|
—
|
611,200
|
(3,337,000
|
)
|
10,304,000
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock converted to common stock
|
(44,252
|
)
|
(500
|
)
|
44,252
|
500
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
dividend (stock)
|
89,020
|
500
|
—
|
—
|
(500
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
—
|
—
|
360,000
|
4,000
|
188,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
192,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation
related to grant of stock and options to board members
|
—
|
—
|
150,000
|
1,500
|
132,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
133,500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value
assigned to warrants and options issued for professional services
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
4,500
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
4,500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
Income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Loss for the year
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(1,926,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(1,926,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain on available for sale securities
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1,124,000
|
—
|
—
|
1,124,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(802,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
— December 31, 2004
|
935,332
|
$
|
9,000
|
16,869,031
|
$
|
169,000
|
$
|
68,385,000
|
($302,000
|
)
|
—
|
($56,216,000
|
)
|
$
|
1,124,000
|
611,200
|
($3,337,000
|
)
|
$
|
9,832,000
|
|||||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock converted to common stock
|
(75,995
|
)
|
—
|
75,995
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
dividend (stock)
|
93,502
|
1,000
|
—
|
—
|
(1,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued
Interest on subscription receivable
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(14,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(14,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Reserve
on stock subscriptions receivable
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
215,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
215,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
Income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Loss for the year
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(186,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(186,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Realized
gain on available for sale securities
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(1,124,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
(1,124,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
— December 31, 2005
|
952,839
|
$
|
10,000
|
16,945,026
|
$
|
169,000
|
$
|
68,384,000
|
($316,000
|
)
|
$
|
215,000
|
($56,402,000
|
)
|
—
|
611,200
|
($3,337,000
|
)
|
$
|
8,723,000
|
See
notes
to financial statements
F-5
eXegenics
Inc.
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
Year
Ended December
31,
|
|||||||||
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(186,000
|
)
|
$
|
(1,926,000
|
)
|
$
|
(5,793,000
|
)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
3,000
|
5,000
|
55,000
|
|||||||
Non-cash
expenses relating to strategic redirection
|
—
|
—
|
171,000
|
|||||||
Value
assigned to warrants, options and compensatory stock
|
—
|
138,000
|
20,000
|
|||||||
Interest
accrual on subscriptions receivable
|
(14,000
|
)
|
(2,000
|
)
|
(1,000
|
)
|
||||
Reserve
for subscriptions receivable
|
215,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
Gain
on Sale of Investments, net
|
(1,064,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Changes
in:
|
||||||||||
Release
of cash restricted for operating lease obligations
|
175,000
|
425,000
|
—
|
|||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
(64,000
|
)
|
569,000
|
(87,000
|
)
|
|||||
Payment
of operating lease obligations
|
—
|
(87,000
|
)
|
—
|
||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
38,000
|
(712,000
|
)
|
(201,000
|
)
|
|||||
Net
provided by (cash used) in operating activities
|
(897,000
|
)
|
(1,590,000
|
)
|
(5,836,000
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||
Net
sales of equipment
|
—
|
—
|
28,000
|
|||||||
Sales
of investment securities
|
1,064,000
|
—
|
10,000,000
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
1,064,000
|
—
|
10,028,000
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of common stock through exercise of options and
warrants
|
—
|
192,000
|
4,000
|
|||||||
Payment
of capital lease obligations
|
—
|
—
|
(202,000
|
)
|
||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
—
|
192,000
|
(198,000
|
)
|
||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
167,000
|
(1,398,000
|
)
|
3,994,000
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
8,734,000
|
10,132,000
|
6,138,000
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$
|
8,901,000
|
$
|
8,734,000
|
$
|
10,132,000
|
||||
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$
|
2,000
|
$
|
2,000
|
$
|
9,000
|
||||
Cash
paid for Income Taxes
|
$
|
36,000
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Noncash
investing activities:
|
||||||||||
Investment
in Intrac, Inc.
|
—
|
1,124,000
|
—
|
F-6
eXegenics
Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
A — The Company
eXegenics
Inc.,
formerly known as Cytoclonal Pharmaceutics Inc. (“eXegenics”
or
the
“Company”), was previously involved in the research, creation, and development
of drugs for the treatment and/or prevention of cancer and infectious diseases.
During 2004, the Company completed the termination all research activities.
All
scientific staff and administrative positions were eliminated and all of
the
Company’s research activities were terminated. Our objective continues to be to
redeploy our assets and actively pursue new business opportunities.
Note
B — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Cash
equivalents, restricted cash
The
Company considers all non-restrictive, highly liquid short-term investments
purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. Cash equivalents, which amount to $8,901,000 and $8,734,000
at
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, consist principally of interest
bearing cash deposits. Restricted cash, amounted to $0 at December 31, 2005,
and
$175,000 at December 31, 2004, consisted of certificates of deposits that
are
used as collateral for equipment leases.
The
Company maintains cash and cash equivalents at several financial institutions
which periodically may exceed federally insured amounts. The Company has
not
experienced any loss in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any
significant risk on cash and cash equivalents.
Marketable
Securities
The
Company accounts for marketable securities in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 115 “Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities” (“SFAS 115”). SFAS 115 establishes the accounting
and reporting requirements for all debt securities and for investments in
equity
securities that have readily determinable fair values. All marketable securities
must be classified as one of the following: held-to-maturity,
available-for-sale, or trading. The Company classifies its marketable securities
as available-for sale and, as such, carries the investments at fair value,
with
unrealized holding gains and losses reported in stockholders’ equity as a
separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income. The cost of
securities sold is determined based on the specific identification method.
Realized gains and losses, and declines in value judged to be other than
temporary, are included in investment income.
In
2001,
the Company entered into a planned merger agreement that was subsequently
terminated as a part of a negotiated settlement, it received a convertible
subordinated promissory note in the amount of $500,000. In September 2003,
this
note was converted to 339,736 shares of Innovative Drug Delivery System (“IDDS”)
series C preferred stock and as of December 31, 2003, the Company had placed
a
full valuation allowance on the value of these securities. In late December
2004, the Company was informed that Intrac, Inc. acquired IDDS and all of
the
Company’s shares in IDDS were to be converted to 345,991 shares of Intrac, Inc.
common stock. As of December 31, 2004 the fair value of the Company’s investment
in these securities was equal to approximately $1,124,000 and a corresponding
unrealized gain is included as a component of other comprehensive
income.
During
2005, the Company sold all of its marketable securities, realizing a gain
on
sale of approximately $1,064,000. These securities consisted of equity
securities (common stock) in Javelin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (formally known
as
Intrac, Inc.) and were classified as available for sale and reported at their
fair values. Realized gains and losses from the sale of investments are reported
in current earnings. Unrealized gains and losses from these securities are
reported as a separate component of stockholders equity and excluded from
current earnings. As of December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the fair
value
of the Company’s investments was equal to approximately $0 and $1,124,000 with
corresponding unrealized gains in 2004 included as a component of other
comprehensive income.
Equipment
Equipment
is stated at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method
over
the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from 3 to 5 years.
Repairs
and maintenance that do not increase the economic useful life of the asset
are
charged to expense as incurred.
The
Company reviews its capital assets for impairment whenever events or changes
in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. In
performing the review, the Company uses the undiscounted cash flow method.
F-7
Revenue
recognition
Revenue
from research support agreements is recognized ratably over the length of
the
agreements. Revenue resulting from contracts or agreements with milestones
is
recognized when the milestone is achieved. Amounts received in advance of
services to be performed or the achievement of milestones are recorded as
deferred revenue.
Research
and development
Research
and development costs are charged to expense as incurred.
Loss
per common share
Basic
and
diluted loss per common share is based on the net loss increased by dividends
on
preferred stock divided by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the year. No effect has been given to outstanding options,
warrants or convertible preferred stock in the diluted computation, as their
effects would be anti-dilutive. The number of potentially dilutive securities
excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share was approximately
2,148,000, 2,325,000 and 3,739,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2004
and 2003, respectively.
Stock-based
compensation
The
Company accounts for stock- based compensation according to Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and the related interpretations under Financial
Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Interpretation No. 44, "Accounting for
Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation." The Company adopted the
required disclosure provisions under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 148 and continues to use the intrinsic value method of accounting for
stock-based compensation.
Comprehensive
Income
SFAS
No.
130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income," establishes standards for the reporting
and display of comprehensive income and its components within the financial
statements. Other comprehensive income is comprised of charges to stockholders'
equity, other than contributions from or distributions to stockholders, excluded
from the determination of net income. The Company's other
comprehensive
income is comprised of unrealized gains on available for sale marketable
securities.
Income
Taxes
The
Company has applied the provisions of SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income
Taxes," which requires the recognition of deferred income tax assets and
liabilities for the consequences of temporary differences between amounts
reported for financial reporting and income tax purposes, including net
operating loss carryforwards. SFAS No. 109 requires recognition of a future
tax
benefit of net operating loss carryforwards and certain other temporary
differences to the extent that realization of such benefit is more likely
than
not; otherwise, a valuation allowance is applied.
Fair
value of financial instruments
The
carrying value of cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued expenses
approximates their fair value due to the short period to maturity of these
instruments.
Use
of estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
F-8
Recent
Accounting Pronouncement
In
May
2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Statement Accounting Standards
No.
154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections-a replacement of APB Opinion No.
20 and FASB Statement No. 3” (“SFAS 154”). This Statement replaces APB Opinion
No. 20, “Accounting Changes,” and FASB Statement No. 3, “Reporting Accounting
Changes in Interim Financial Statements.” SFAS 154 requires retrospective
application to prior periods’ financial statements for changes in accounting
principle, unless it is impractical to determine either the period-specific
effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS 154 also requires that
a
change in depreciation, amortization, or depletion method for long,
non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate
effected by a change in accounting principle. SFAS 154 is effective for
accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2005. The Company believes that adoption of the provisions
of
SFAS 154 will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-based Payment.” SFAS No.
123R is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation”,
and supersedes APB 25. Among other items, SFAS 123R eliminates the use of
APB 25
and the intrinsic value method of accounting, and requires companies to
recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of
equity instruments, based on the grant date fair value of those awards, in
the
financial statements. The effective date of SFAS 123R is January 1, 2006,
for
calendar year companies.
SFAS
123R
permits companies to adopt its requirements using either a “modified
prospective” method, or a “modified retrospective” method. Under the “modified
prospective” method, compensation cost recognized in the financial statements
beginning with the effective date, based on the requirements of SFAS 123R
for
all share-based payments granted after that date, and based on the requirements
of SFAS 123 for all unvested awards granted prior to the effective date of
SFAS
123R. Under the “modified retrospective” method, the requirements are the same
as under the “modified prospective” method, but also permits entities to restate
financial statements of previous periods based on proforma disclosures made
in
accordance with SFAS 123.
The
Company currently utilizes a standard option pricing model (i.e., Black
-Scholes) to measure the fair value of stock options granted to employees.
While
SFAS 123R permits entities to continue to use such a model, the standard
also
permits the use of a “lattice” model. The Company has not yet determined which
model it will use to measure the fair value of employee stock options upon
the
adoption of SFAS 123R.
SFAS
123R
also requires that the benefits associated with the tax deductions in excess
of
recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow, rather
than
as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This requirement
will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows
in
periods after the effective date. These future amounts cannot be estimated
because they depend on, among other things, when employees exercise stock
options.
Note
C — License Agreements
On
September 8, 2004 the Company entered into an Intellectual Property
Assignment Agreement to license the Company’s QCT drug discovery technology to
NLC Pharma, Inc. (a Delaware corporation based in Israel). Pursuant to the
Agreement the Company will receive monies from royalties, licenses or the
sale
of QCT technology to third parties that are generated by NLC Pharma Inc.
The
Company
did not earn any revenue under this agreement during 2005, nor does it
anticipate receiving any revenues from this agreement in future years.
Note
D — Equipment
Equipment
is summarized as follows:
|
December
31,
|
||||||
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||
Office
equipment
|
$
|
26,000
|
$
|
26,000
|
|||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(26,000
|
)
|
(23,000
|
)
|
|||
Net
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
3,000
|
F-9
Note
E — Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses consist of the following:
|
December
31,
|
||||||
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||
Professional
fees
|
$
|
23,000
|
$
|
39,000
|
|||
Legal
Reserve
|
250,000
|
—
|
|||||
Equipment
Return Reserve
|
—
|
100,000
|
|||||
Delaware
Franchise Tax
|
—
|
32,000
|
|||||
Other
|
4,000
|
68,000
|
|||||
$
|
277,000
|
$
|
239,000
|
Note
F — Capital Lease Obligations
During
2005, the Company terminated all capital lease obligations and as a result
$175,000 in collateral was released from restriction.
Note
G — Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred
stock
On
January 6, 1992, the Board of Directors designated 4,000,000 shares of preferred
stock as Series A convertible preferred stock. The holders of Series A preferred
stock are entitled to (i) convert on a one-for-one basis to common stock
subject
to adjustment, as defined, (ii) voting rights equivalent to voting rights
of
common stockholders, (iii) receive dividends equal to $.25 per share payable
on
or about January 15 each year in cash or newly-issued shares of Series A
preferred or a combination thereof (iv) liquidation preferences of $2.50
per
preferred share. The Company, at its option, has the right to redeem all
or any
portion of the Series A convertible preferred stock at $2.50 per share plus
accrued and unpaid dividends.
During
January 2003, the Company elected to pay the required yearly dividend on
its
Series A convertible preferred stock by issuing additional shares of Series
A
convertible preferred stock. The Company issued 82,834 shares of Series A
convertible preferred stock to satisfy the 10% dividend. In addition, during
2003, 20,293 shares of Series A convertible preferred stock were converted
into
20,293 shares of common stock.
During
January 2004, the Company elected to pay the required yearly dividend by
issuing
additional shares of Series A convertible preferred. The Company issued 89,020
shares to satisfy the 10% dividend. In addition, during 2004, 44,252 shares
of
Series A convertible preferred were converted into 44,252 shares of common
stock
During
January 2005, the Company elected to pay the required yearly dividend by
issuing
additional shares of Series A convertible preferred. The Company issued 93,502
shares to satisfy the 10% dividend. In addition, during 2005, 75,995 shares
of
Series A convertible preferred were converted into 75,995 shares of common
stock.
Common
Stock
During
the second quarter 2004, the Board of Directors adopted a resolution providing
for the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock and the granting of
stock options as part of compensation paid to directors for their service
to the
Company. Upon joining the Board, directors are issued 25,000 shares of common
stock. The chairman of the Board receives an additional 25,000 shares at
the
time he assumes this role. Members of the Board of Directors are granted
an
option to purchase 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on the first day
of each calendar quarter, with an exercise price equal to the closing trading
price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. In the second quarter
2004, the Chairman of the Board was issued 50,000 shares of common stock,
Directors were issued 25,000 shares. In the aggregate, 150,000 shares of
common
stock were issued and recorded at their fair value on the date of grant.
No
common stock was issued to the Board of Directors in 2005.
F-10
Stockholder
Rights Plan
On
June
9, 2003, the then current Board of Directors adopted a shareholders rights
plan.
Under the plan, each holder of the Company’s common stock as of the close of
business on June 9, 2003 received, as a non-taxable dividend, one right for
each
share of common stock held. Each right entitles the holder to purchase from
the
Company one one-thousandth of a share of Series B Junior Participating Preferred
Stock at an exercise price of $4.50, subject to adjustment. If a person or
group
acquires beneficial ownership of 15 percent or more of the Company’s common
stock, each right will entitle its holder (other than the acquiring person
or
members of the acquiring group) to purchase, at the right's then current
exercise price (initially $4.50), a number of the Company’s shares of common
stock having a market value of twice such price (initially $9.00).
In
addition, if the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination
transaction after a person has acquired beneficial ownership of 15 percent
or
more of its common stock, each right will entitle its holder to purchase,
at the
rights' then current exercise price (initially $4.50), a number of the acquiring
company's shares of common stock having a market value of twice such price
(initially $9.00). Following the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial
ownership of 15 percent of the Company’s common stock and prior to an
acquisition of beneficial ownership of 50 percent or more of its common stock
the Board of Directors may exchange the rights (other than rights owned by
such
acquiring person or group, which will have become null and void and
nontransferable), in whole or in part, at an exchange ratio of one share
of
common stock (or one-thousandth of a share of Series B Junior Participating
Preferred Stock) per right. The Company may redeem the rights at a price
of
$.001 per right at any time prior to the time a person has become the beneficial
owner of 15% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The rights will
expire on June 9, 2013, unless earlier exchanged or redeemed.
Subscriptions
receivable
In
May
2001, we sold 100,000 shares of common stock to our former President and
Chief
Executive Officer, Ronald L. Goode, Ph.D., for a purchase price of $3.25
per
share, the fair market value at the time of the transaction. Dr. Goode paid
the
purchase price of $325,000 with $25,000 in cash and issued a $300,000 five-year
promissory note to us bearing interest at a rate of 4.71% per annum, with
interest payable semi-annually. The 100,000 shares sold to Dr. Goode, serve
as
collateral to secure the note. The note provides that in the event of a default
on the note, as defined in the agreement, Dr. Goode’s obligation to the Company
is limited to $65,000 and proceeds from the public sale of the collateralizing
stock. Through December 31, 2004, Dr. Goode has made $86,000 in interest
payments. A stock certificate for these shares was not issued to Dr. Goode
until
September 2003. In February 2004, Dr. Goode resigned, thereby terminating
his
employment agreement with the Company and in 2005 he has failed to make $14,000
in interest payments. In the second quarter 2005, the Company recorded a
reserve
against the subscription receivable balance so that the net balance is
approximately equal to Dr. Goode’s obligation under the note.
Warrants
At
December 31, 2005, outstanding warrants to acquire shares of the Company’s
common stock are as follows:
Warrant
Type
|
Exercise
Price
|
Expiration
Dates
|
Number
of
Shares
Reserved
|
|||||||
Other
|
$
|
0.55
to $1.00
|
July
2004-March 2008
|
290,000
|
On
August
13, 2002 the Company issued warrants to purchase 125,000 shares of its common
stock at a purchase price of $1.00 per share, with an expiration date of
August
13, 2007, and additional warrants to purchase 125,000 shares of our common
stock
at a purchase price of $0.55 per share, with an expiration date of August
13,
2007 to Roan/Meyers Associates, L.P. in exchange for financial advisory
services. In connection with this exchange, the Company recorded a charge
of
$91,000 to operations during 2002 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model.
In
March
2003, the Company entered into an agreement with Petkevich & Partners, LLC
whereby the Company issued warrants to purchase 40,000 shares of common stock
at
$0.58 per share expiring on March 5, 2008. These warrants vested during 2003;
the Company determined the fair value based on the Black-Scholes option pricing
model of these warrants to be approximately $5,000, which was charged to
operations during 2003.
The
Company did not incur any warrant related expenses in 2004 and
2005.
F-11
Stock
options
During
1996, the Board of Directors and the stockholders of the Company approved
the
1996 Stock Option Plan (the “1996 Plan”) that provides for the granting of
incentive and nonstatutory options for up to 750,000 shares of common stock
to
officers, employees, directors and consultants of the Company. During 1998,
the
Board of Directors and the stockholders of the Company approved an amendment
to
the Plan to allow for the granting of an additional 750,000 options. At December
31, 2005 and 2004, 980,000 and 922,000, respectively, options were available
for
future grant under the 1996 Plan.
During
2000, the Board of Directors and the stockholders of the Company approved
the
2000 Stock Option Plan (the “2000 Plan”), which provides for the granting of
incentive and nonstatutory options for up to 1,500,000 shares of common stock
to
officers, employees, directors, independent contractors, advisors and
consultants of the Company. The Company subsequently amended the 2000 plan
to
increase the options available for future grants by 1,250,000 shares and
to
change the vesting period. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, 2,365,000 and
1,820,000, respectively, options are available for grant under the 2000
Plan.
Options
granted under the Plans are exercisable for a period of up to 10 years from
date
of grant at an exercise price which is not less than the fair value of the
common stock on date of grant, except that the exercise period of options
granted to a stockholder owning more than 10% of the outstanding capital
stock
may not exceed five years and their exercise price may not be less than 110%
of
the fair value of the common stock at date of grant. For the 1996 Plan, options
generally vest 40% after six months of employment and thereafter 20% annually
on
the anniversary date of the grant. For the 2000 Plan, as a result of an
amendment approved by the stockholders in 2001, the vesting period changed
from
50% annually on the anniversary date of the grant, to 33 1/3% annually on
the
anniversary date of the grant. Under the 2000 plan, the Board of Directors
has
authority to modify the vesting period. Non-employee director options are
immediately exercisable on the date of grant.
Stock
option activity under the Plans are summarized as follows:
Year
Ended December
31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
|||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
||||||||||||||
Options
outstanding at beginning of year
|
1,100,000
|
$
|
3.02
|
2,158,000
|
$
|
3.02
|
3,286,855
|
$
|
4.29
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
80,000
|
.40
|
165,000
|
.82
|
455,000
|
0.51
|
|||||||||||||
Exercised
|
—
|
—
|
(360,000
|
)
|
0.53
|
(10,000
|
)
|
0.40
|
|||||||||||
Expired
|
(275,000
|
)
|
0.72
|
(863,000
|
)
|
3.64
|
(1,573,855
|
)
|
5.06
|
||||||||||
Canceled
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||||
Options
outstanding at end of year
|
905,000
|
3.37
|
1,100,000
|
3.02
|
2,158,000
|
3.02
|
|||||||||||||
Options
exercisable at end of year
|
880,000
|
3.44
|
971,660
|
3.32
|
1,932,000
|
3.26
|
The
following table presents information relating to stock options outstanding
under
the plans as of December 31, 2005:
Options
Outstanding
|
Options
Exercisable
|
|||||||||||||||
Range
of
Exercise
Price
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
in Years
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||||||
$0.40-$2.99
|
450,000
|
$
|
1.49
|
3.48
|
425,000
|
$
|
1.45
|
|||||||||
$3.00-$4.99
|
305,000
|
4.27
|
0.20
|
305,000
|
4.27
|
|||||||||||
$5.00-$7.43
|
40,000
|
6.75
|
0.18
|
40,000
|
6.75
|
|||||||||||
$7.44-$9.88
|
110,000
|
7.45
|
0.09
|
110,000
|
7.45
|
|||||||||||
905,000
|
880,000
|
Pro
forma
information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by SFAS
No.
123, and has been determined as if we accounted for our stock option grants
under the fair market value method as prescribed by such statement. The fair
market value of our stock options was estimated at the date of grant using
the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions.
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
|||
Risk-free
interest rates
|
3.6%
to 4.3%
|
2.9%
to 3.6%
|
2.5%
to 3.5%
|
|||
Expected
option life in years
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
|||
Expected
stock price volatility
|
63%
to 75%
|
72%
to 75%
|
89%
to 105%
|
|||
Expected
dividend yield
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
F-12
The
weighted average fair value at date of grant for options granted during 2005,
2004 and 2003 was $0.40, $0.81, and $0.09 per option, respectively. The Company
accounts for stock- based compensation according to Accounting Principles
Board
Opinion No. 25 and the related interpretations under Financial Accounting
Standards Board ("FASB") Interpretation No. 44, "Accounting for Certain
Transactions Involving Stock Compensation." The Company adopted the required
disclosure provisions under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
148
and continues to use the intrinsic value method of accounting for stock-based
compensation.
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
|||||||
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders as reported
|
$
|
(420,000
|
)
|
$
|
(2,149,000
|
)
|
$
|
(6,000,000
|
)
|
|
Deduct:
Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined
under fair value based
method for all
awards,
net of related tax effects
|
(11,000
|
)
|
(32,000
|
)
|
(154,000
|
)
|
||||
Pro
forma net income
|
$
|
(431,000
|
)
|
$
|
(2,181,000
|
)
|
$
|
(6,154,000
|
)
|
|
Earnings
per share:
|
||||||||||
Basic
and diluted-as reported
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
Basic
and Diluted-pro forma
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
The
Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating
the
fair market value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and
are
fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input
of
highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility.
Because our stock options have characteristics significantly different from
those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions
can materially affect the fair market value estimates, in management’s opinion,
the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure
of the
fair market value of our stock options.
Note
H — Income Taxes
At
December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company had approximately $53,080,000 and
$51,041,000 of net operating loss carry forwards and $491,000 and $521,000
of
research and development credit carry forwards, respectively, for federal
income
tax purposes that expire in years 2006 through 2022.
At
December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company had a deferred tax asset of
approximately $18,541,000 and $19,521,000 respectively, representing the
benefits of its net operating loss and research and development credit carry
forwards and certain expenses not currently deductible for tax purposes,
principally related to the granting of stock options and warrants, and non-cash
reorganization and merger expenses. The Company’s deferred tax asset has been
fully reserved by a valuation allowance since realization of its benefit
is
uncertain. The difference between the statutory tax rate of 34% and the
Company’s effective tax rate is principally due to the increase (decrease) in
the valuation allowance of ($980,000) (2005), $644,000 (2004), and $1,902,000
(2003). The Company’s ability to utilize its carry forwards may be subject to an
annual limitation in future periods pursuant to Section 382 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Note
I — Commitments and Other Matters
Leases
The
Company leases office space from RFG Associates, an entity in which John
A.
Paganelli, chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company is an equity
owner.
The lease provides for a monthly rent of $625 and is cancelable by either
party
upon thirty (30) days notice. Rent expense, prior to any reorganization expense,
was approximately $11,000, $20,000, and $238,000 for the years ended December
31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Legal
Proceedings
Weiss
Litigation.
On
May 15, 2003, The M&B Weiss Family Limited Partnership of 1996 filed a
lawsuit in the Delaware Court of Chancery, purportedly as a class action
on
behalf of all other similarly situated stockholders of the Company, against
the
Company, as a nominal defendant, and
former directors: Joseph M. Davie, Robert J. Easton, Ronald L. Goode and
Walter
Lovenberg, (collectively referred to as the “Individual Defendants”), and
purportedly as a derivative action on behalf of the Company against
the Individual Defendants (the “Weiss Litigation”). On
April
12, 2005 the judge, in a ruling from the bench, dismissed the matter with
prejudice.
F-13
Labidi
Proceeding.
On
October 5, 2005, in the matter brought by Abdel Hakim Labidi (one of our
former
employees) against the Company, a jury ruled in favor of Dr. Labidi determining
that the Company converted certain biological research materials owned by
Dr.
Labidi, and the Company committed theft of biological materials owned by
Dr.
Labidi. The jury awarded Dr. Labidi a total of $600,000. The Company is
reviewing this matter to determine the validity of appealing the decision
of the
jury. The final amount due by the Company to Dr. Labidi under such judgment
is
likely to be between $250,000 and $750,000, however the Company has recorded
a
provision of $250,000 in the financial statements.
2110
Research Row, Ltd. Proceeding.
On
December 31, 2003, the termination date of our lease agreement, we vacated
19,300 square feet of office and laboratory space that we occupied at 2110
Research Row, Dallas, Texas. 2110 Research Row, Ltd. (the “Landlord”) acquired
this property in April 2002. The Landlord contends he is owed payments that
we
believe to be outside the terms of the lease agreement or waived by the previous
landlord. In October 2003, we filed suit against the Landlord and 9000
Harry Hines, Inc., in a Dallas County District Court. The Company, as tenant,
and the Landlord were parties to a lease agreement (“Lease Agreement”) dated
October 1, 1991, as amended. On March 19, 2004, we entered into
a settlement agreement with the Landlord, whereby we made a $33,000 payment
to
the Landlord, dismissed the suit with prejudice and entered into a mutual
release of any and all claims by all parties. On April 9, 2004, the
Landlord and the Company filed an Agreed Order Of Dismissal With Prejudice
in
The District Court, 134th
Judicial
District, Dallas County Texas.
Employment
agreements
David
Hostelley
On
July
1, 2005 David Hostelley was named Chief Financial Officer of the Company.
The
Company’s agreement with Mr. Hostelley calls for him to receive $2,500 per
month, and his employment is terminable by either side upon written
notice.
Related
party transactions
John
Paganelli
In
January 2004, the Company entered into a lease agreement for office space
with
RFG Associates, an entity in which John A. Paganelli, chairman of the Board
of
Directors of the Company is an equity owner. The lease provides for a monthly
rent of $625 and is cancelable by either party upon thirty (30) days notice.
Note
J — 401(k) Plan
The
Company had maintained a defined contribution 401(k) plan available to eligible
employees but discontinued this plan during 2003. Employee contributions
were
voluntary and were determined on an individual basis, limited to the maximum
amount allowable under federal tax regulations. The Company made no
contributions during 2005, 2004, and 2003.
Note
K — Quarterly Results (Unaudited)
|
Quarter
Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
|
March
31
|
June
30
|
September
30
|
December
31
|
Total
Year
|
|||||||||||
2005
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
(290,000
|
)
|
(434,000
|
)
|
870,000
|
(332,000
|
)
|
(186,000
|
)
|
|||||||
Loss
per share — basic and diluted(a)
|
(0.03
|
)
|
(0.03
|
)
|
0.05
|
(0.01
|
)
|
0.03
|
||||||||
2004
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||||
Net
loss
|
(739,000
|
)
|
(531,000
|
)
|
(368,000
|
)
|
(288,000
|
)
|
(1,926,000
|
)
|
||||||
Loss
per share — basic and diluted(a)
|
(0.06
|
)
|
(0.03
|
)
|
(0.02
|
)
|
(0.02
|
)
|
(0.13
|
)
|
(a)
|
Per
common share amounts for the quarters and full year have been calculated
separately. Accordingly, quarterly amounts may not add to the annual
amount because of differences in the weighted average common shares
outstanding during each period due to the effect of the Company’s issuing
shares of its common stock during the
year.
|
F-14